Cases

367 B.R. 795 (2007) In re Jerilyn H. SILVER, Debtor. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, individually and as assignee of Santa Fe Private Equity Fund II, LP, Plaintiff, v. Jerilyn H. Silver, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 7-96-11878 SS. Adversary No. 98-1281 S. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico. April 16, 2007. *796<

303 B.R. 849 (2004) In re A. David SILVER and Jerilyn H. Silver, Debtors. Yvette J. Gonzales, Trustee, and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, individually and as Assignee of Santa Fe (Jointly Administered) Private Equity Fund II, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service), Defendant-Appellant. BAP No. NM-03-042. Bankruptcy Nos. 7-96-11879-SS, 7-96-11878-SS. Adversary Nos.

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

966 F.Supp. 587 (1995) The LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, in its individual capacity and as assignee of the Santa Fe Private Equity Fund II, L.P., a New Mexico limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. A. David SILVER, and ADS Partners, L.P., a New Mexico limited partnership, Defendants. No. 86 C 7175. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De

MEMORANDUM OPINION STEWART ROSE, Chief Judge. The ruling of the court is that Defendant Avnet received an avoidable preference under section 547 when it collected its judgment from the plaintiffs Silver. Silver could not have intended a contemporaneous exchange by payment of a judgment in exchange for a release of a judgment lien when he did not know of the existence of the judgment lien. One can not intend t

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc. (“debtor” or “Silver Wheel”) appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the bankruptcy court determining the priority of rights and interests in certain property of debtor’s bankruptcy estate. The bankruptcy court awarded Freightliner Market Development Corp. (“Freightliner”) the proceeds derived from the liquidation of debtor’s transp

823 F.2d 362 Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,905, 4 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 588FREIGHTLINER MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Delawarecorporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.SILVER WHEEL FREIGHTLINES, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant,andEverette H. Williams, Trustee of Silver Wheel Freightlines,Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 86-3813, 86-3814. United States Court o

239 F.3d 808 (6th Cir. 2001) H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York and Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, derivatively on behalf of Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation; California Public Employees' Retirement System; New York State Teachers' Retirement System; New York City Fire Department Pension Fund; New York City Police Department Pension Fund; New York City Teachers' Retirement System; New York City Board o

OPINION BACA, Justice. Appellant David Silver was the general partner of the Santa Fe Private Equity Fund II, L.P. (SFPEF II), a limited partnership. He appeals from a court order that affirms a settlement agreement arrived upon by the limited partners through their receiver, John Clark, appellee. The order distributes the assets of the limited partnership in the order

*1078 OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: In 2012, California enacted Senate Bill 863 (“SB 863”) to combat an acute “lien crisis” in its workers’ compensation system. These liens are filed by medical providers and other vendors to seek payment for services provided to an injured wor

JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice. |, This case involves a question of law certified to this court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in accordance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-8 (2010) and accepted by this court on December 16, 2010. See Gibbs v. Primelending, 2010 Ark. 503, 2010 WL 5185466. The question certified is “[w]hether the use of the conspiracy theory of in

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES MCRITCHIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0890-JTL ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL K. ) SANDBERG, ROBERT M. KIMMITT, ) PEGGY ALFORD, MARC L.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEPHEN M. SCIANNELLA, individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0125-PAF ) ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ) ASTRAZ

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEPHEN M. SCIANNELLA, individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0125-PAF ) ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ) ASTRAZ

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Basem Habash filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in August 2004. Nearly 20 months later, Najib Zedan, a judgment creditor of Habash, initiated an adversary proceeding that objected to the discharge of Habash’s debts because of alleged fraud by Habash in representing his income and assets to the bankruptcy trustee. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4); 727(d)(1). At the time Zedan filed the adversary

255 F.Supp.2d 1054 (2003) Mark LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. Eugene D. SMITH, et al., Defendants. No. 01-0748-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 4, 2003. *1055 James M. Jellison, Schleier Jellison & Schleier PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff. Michael King Goodwin, Office of Attorney General Liability Manageme

MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. This action was brought by John, Doe and. Richard Roe (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Salisbury University (“SU”), Valerie Randall-Lee,1 Helena Hill,2 Jane Doe # 1, Jane Poe # 2, and Jane Doe # 3 (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“ÍIE

Appellate Case: 21-3035 Document: 010110833726 Date Filed: 03/28/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 28, 2023 UN