Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Sang v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company”
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom RADER, Chief Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges, join, concurring in denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. I join Chief Judge Rader in his reminder, lest we forget, of the incentive purposes of the patent grant; and I join Judge Lourie in pointing out that, contrary to the dissenters’ theory, “dominating” patents can dominate infringing e
Jin v. Shanghai Original, Inc.public domain
19-3782 Jin v. Shanghai Original, Inc., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2020 (Argued: November 19, 2020 | Decided: March 9, 2021) Docket No. 19-3782 JIANMIN JIN, Plaintiff-Appella
Pfizer Inc. v. Apotex Inc.public domain
731 F.Supp.2d 741 (2010) PFIZER INC., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company, and Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Plaintiffs, v. APOTEX INC. and Apotex Corp., Defendants. Case Nos. 08-cv-7231, 09-cv-6053. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 30, 2010. *742 Rudolf E. Hutz, Daniel C. Mulve
Cifuentes v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
Opinion PERREN, J. * Carlos Cifuentes won a judgment for lost wages against his former employer, Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco). Costco withheld federal and state payroll taxes from the award. Cifuentes claimed the judgment was not satisfied, citing the
Castro v. Melchor.public domain
OPINION OF RECKTENWALD, C.J. I. Introduction This case arises from a complaint filed by Respondent Leah Castro (Castro), who had a stillbirth while she was incarcerated. Castro brought suit against Leroy Melchor, Wanna Bhalang, Tomi Bradley (all in their official capacities), the State of Hawai'i, and the Hawai'i Department of Public Safety (HD
3Com Corp. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.public domain
473 F.Supp.2d 1001 (2007) 3COM CORP, Plaintiff, v. D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC, Defendant, and Realtek Semiconductor Corp, Intervenor. 3Com Corp, Plaintiff, v. D-Link Systems, Inc, Defendant. Nos. C 03-2177 VRW, C 05-0098 VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 26, 2007. *1002
King v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder and a sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the convictions and the sentences imposed by the trial court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 6, 2008, Michael L. King was indicted on one count
Boeing Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This patent case is before the court following an extensive trial in Washington, D.C. During initial planning, the angle of inclination of the orbit of what would become the International Space Station — its orbit relative to the equator — was set at 28.5 degrees, to coincide with the latitude of the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) launch center
Toscano v. Nimmopublic domain
570 F.Supp. 1197 (1983) Margaret Nava TOSCANO, Plaintiff, v. Robert NIMMO, the Administrator of the Veterans Administration, an Agency of the United States of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 82-315-WKS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 31, 1983. *1198 Sheldon N. Sandler, Barry M. Willoughby, Young, Conaway, Starg
Greenbie v. Noblepublic domain
151 F.Supp. 45 (1957) Marjorie Barstow GREENBIE, Plaintiff, v. Hollister NOBLE, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Sears Roebuck and Company, National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (Inc.), Foote, Cone & Belding, Inc. and Hallmark Cards, Inc., Defendants. United States District Court S. D. New York. April 3, 1957.
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. (CST) and Sanford M. Stevenson seek compensation from the government, under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), for unlawful use of two of their patents. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent No. 5,370,800 (the 800 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 4,749,497 (the 497 patent), both of which relate to the treatment of waste water and are used in a device marketed by CS
United States v. Daniel J. Koenigpublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The scales of justice are not always evenly balanced; one of the scales holds a few extra weights in favor of a person accused of crime. This appeal deals with one of those weights: the limited jurisdiction of this Court to hear a government appeal from an order of a district court suppressing evidence.
Robinson v. Magovernpublic domain
521 F.Supp. 842 (1981) John N. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. George J. MAGOVERN, Cardiothoracic Surgical Associates, Inc., Allegheny General Hospital and Henry G. Allyn, Jr., Gay E. Bodick, Fred Brand, Jr., Henry Chalfant, Ronald R. Davenport, Harry Edelman, III, Harry M. Epstine, William H. Genge, W. H. Krome George, R. Burt Gookin, Thomas C. Graham, Kenneth C. Hewitt, John A. Huffman, Jr., B. F. Jones, III, Bernard H. Jones, Caryl M. Kline, Richard K
Congress of Racial Equality v. Douglaspublic domain
318 F.2d 95 The CONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY, John Doe and Mary Doe, Appellants,v.C. H. DOUGLAS, individually and as Mayor of the City ofMcComb City, Mississippi, and Mr. and Mrs. AubreyMcGehee, Appellees. No. 19724. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. May 15, 1963. Derrick A. Bell, Jr., Carl Rach
This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Hearing: August 22, 2013 Mailed: July 9, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Harry Winston, Inc. and