Cases

PER CURIAM. These two cases raise the question of whether the Maine Air National Guard and Puerto Rico Air National Guard may require their “civilian” technicians to wear military uniforms at all times when they are at work, regardless of whether they are performing “military” or “civilian” duties. More specifically, we must decide whether this “uniform” question is a “mandatory” or “permissive” subject of bargaining between

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1739 JANET VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ; RAMON A. DEL VALLE-LOPEZ; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DEL VALLE-VAZQUEZ; CARLOS R. CESPEDES-GOMEZ; JOCELYN CALO-BIRRIEL; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CESPEDES-CALO; SAUL O. ALMEDA-CRUZ; JUDITH NIEVES-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALMEDA- NIEVES; FRANCISCO M. ALVARADO-BARRIOS; MARILYN ALVAREZ-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALVARADO-ALVAREZ; JUAN C. ARROYO-RAMIREZ; DAMARIS VELEZ-RIOS;

723 F.Supp.2d 416 (2010) Sandra Maldonado MORALES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Jorge Noya MONAGAS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1703(GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 28, 2010. *417 Israel Melendez-Torres, Freddie O. Torres-Gomez, Roberto Sueiro-Del-Valle, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Jose A. Mir

20 F.Supp.2d 308 (1998) PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY BOARD OF PUERTO RICO and Cellular Communications of Puerto Rico, Inc., Defendants. Civil No. 97-2926(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 31, 1998. *309 Sandra E. Torres Lopez, San Juan, PR, Joaquin A. Marquez,

762 F.2d 183 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 3013,AFL-CIO, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.Maine Air National Guard and United States Department ofDefense, Intervenors.AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 3936,AFL-CIO and Luis J. Marquez, Petitioners,v.FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MASTROIANNI, United States District Judge I. Introduction This case requires the court to consider whether Title II of the Americans with *417Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, imposes obligations on public school districts with respect to the educational placement

352 F.Supp.2d 152 (2004) 1) Nelson RIVERA-TORRES 2) Maria Luisa Alejandro-Ortiz 3) Carmen Maria Aponte-Lopez 4) Wilson Aponte-Rosario 5) Victor Ayala 6) Alice I. Badillo-Bravo 7) Javier Bonilla-Cintron 8) Marcelino Burgos-Pabon 9) Carlos Colon-Burgos 10) Maria M. Coriano 11) Nilda Zenaida Cosme 12) Aracelis Cotto-Gonzalez 13) Ruysdael Davila-Rodriguez 14) Ana Diaz-Lopez 15) Maria I. Figueroa-Ramirez 16) Myrna Firpi-Solis 17) Marial. Garcia-Morales 18) Vi

629 F.3d 79 (2010) Pat GODIN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Patty SCHENCKS, Joleen Nicely, and Donna Metta, Defendants, Appellants, School Union # 134 and Machiasport School Department Board of Directors, Defendants. No. 09-2324. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 10, 2010. Decided December 22, 2010.

662 F.3d 74 (2011) PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. SPRINTCOM, INC., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Rico; Sandra E. Torres-López, in her official capacity as President of the Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Rico; Gloria Escudero-Morales, in her official capacity as Associate Member of the Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Ri

270 F.Supp.2d 189 (2003) Edna S. Delgado GREO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marcelo TRUJILLO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1389 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 2, 2003. *190 Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR,

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

*518ORDER AND JUDGMENT** PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Cain appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed on his behalf and on behalf of sixteen prisoners incarcerated in Otero County Prison Facility in Chaparral, New Mexico. Citizens of New Mexico

JAMESON, District Judge: Hector Ricardo Pico-Zazueta (Pico) has appealed from a judgment of conviction-, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. He contends that the court failed to give the jury proper instructions on the issue of entrapment.

547 F.3d 993 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John W. SELJAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 27, 2008. Filed October 23, 2008. *995 Jerald Brainin, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant John W. Seljan. M

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non

510 S.E.2d 764 (1998) 203 W.Va. 690 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Hanley C. CLARK, Insurance Commissioner of the State of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC., Defendant Below, West Virginia State Medical Association, Intervenor Below, Appellee, West Virginia Hospital Association; Blue Cross Western Pennsylvania; International Union; United Mine Workers; and Jo

903 F.Supp. 182 (1995) Patricia SINISCALCHI, et al. v. SHOP-RITE SUPERMARKETS, INC. Civ. A. No. 94-30133-MAP. United States District Court, for the District of Massachusetts. August 23, 1995. *183 Charles R. Casartello, Jr., Pellegrini & Seeley, Springfield, MA, for Patricia Siniscalchi. Richard J. Maloney, Thomas E. S

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50236 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00232-AHS JOHN W. SELJAN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Co

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

BIRCH, Circuit Judge, dissenting in which KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge, joins: I respectfully dissent. I remain convinced that this ease is one of those rare, exceptional cases that warrants a change of venue because of pervasive community prejudice making it impossible to empanel an unbiased jury. The defendants, as admitted agents of the Cuban government of Fidel Castro, were unable to obtain a fair and impartial