Cases

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), entered October 29, 1997, which denied his objections to a resettled order of the same court (Herold, H.E.), entered August 6, 1997, which, after a hearing, inter alia, awarded the mother a judgment for arrears in child support in the principal sum of $688.18. Ordered t

SUCCESSION OF SANDRA A. * NO. 2019-CA-0858 MCELVEEN ROBIHO * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH:

SUCCESSION OF SANDRA A. * NO. 2019-CA-0858 MCELVEEN ROBIHO * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH:

CRAIG A. GARGOTTA, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *563Came on for consideration the above numbered adversary proceeding and, in particular, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44 ),1 Defendant's Affidavit in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46) ("Affidavit in Response"), and

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-036-CV SANDRA PAT JENKINS APPELLANT V. DON DAVIS BODY SHOP APPELLEE <

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-036-CV SANDRA PAT JENKINS APPELLANT V. DON DAVIS BODY SHOP

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), entered February 2, 2009, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not süstain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The defendants failed

SANDRA LOUIS * NO. 2022-CA-0047 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL NEW ORLEANS CITY PARK * IMPROVEMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT ASSOCIATION AND XYZ * INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL DIST

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Jimmy Duane Weed participated in a highway overpass protest. Due to traffic safety concerns,- state troopers told- the protesters to disperse. Weed did not comply. He was arrested. Weed sued, alleging that his arrest violated the First and Fourth Amendments and that the statute authorizing the arrest is invalid. The district cou

OPINION OF THE COURT Buckley, J. On December 6, 1999, defendant, after consulting his attorney, offered to plead guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree in full satisfaction of the grand jury indictment charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He understood the trial rights he was giving up, and he admitted that on June 4, 1999 he had

537 F.3d 1 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Donnell A. JENKINS, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1814. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. July 18, 2008. *2 Robert C. Andrews, with whom Robert C. Andrews Esquire P.C. was on brief, for appellant. Donald C. Lockhart, Assistant United States Attorney, with

*680OPINION PER CURIAM. The notice of appeal in this case was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), the notice is considered filed as of the date Appellant delivered it to prison officials for forwarding to the court. The recor

(2008) Cynthia L. JENKINS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Ada Howard, and Sandra Logue, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL COLLECTION CO., Mark D. Stelk and Richard E. Gee, Defendants. No. 8:06CV743. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. February 15, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Distr

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAURIE SMITH CAMP, District Judge. The matter before the Court is the Defendant’s Statement of Appeal of Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett’s August 28, 2007, Order (Filing No. 82), granting the Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Offer of Judgment (Filing No. 77). Judge Gossett ordered that the Offer of Judgment served by Defendant General Collection Co. (“GCC”) upon Plaintiff Cynthia L. Jenkins

The issue on appeal is whether Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-113 (Michie 1997), as amended, rejects our previous holdings that the district court in which a custody or divorce proceeding was originally filed has continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over custody modification proceedings. The district court for the Sixth Judicial District, Campbell County, Wyoming, denied Appellant Vineyard's motion to dismiss on this basis, holding that the 1997 amendments

In re Butler, Kimberly Williamson Clerk et al.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, No. 2004-13781; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2004-CA-1726. Not considered. Not timely filed.

ORDER OWENS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Tab 103] and Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order [Tab 109], INTRODUCTION As the facts of this case are fully set out in the July 11, 2000 Order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants, a brief synopsis of the pertinent facts will be set out here. Plaintiff fil

717 A.2d 561 (1998) In re Phyllis A. SAUNDERS, Aikeem Green, Alaya Green, Andre Green, by Their Parent and Natural Guardian, Sandra Green and Sandra Green, in Her Own Right v. Ellen JENKINS and Hertz Corporation. Tiffany L. FULTON, a Minor, by Her Parents and Natural Guardians, Renaldo FULTON and D. Tina Fulton, h/w and Renaldo Fulton and D. Tina Fulton, h/w, Individually and in Their Own Right v. Phyllis A. SAUNDERS, Ellen Jenkins an

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. This case is currently before the Court on two motions directed at ARINC, Incorporated’s (“ARINC”) cross-claim and third-party complaint. The first is the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) motion to dismiss Count I (Breach of Contract and Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) and Count III (Contractual Indemnification) of AR

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Newton Don Jenkins, Sr. was convicted of one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1999) and twenty-five counts of making false statements to a federally-insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (1999). Jenkins moved for a directed verdict, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to convict him. The district court denied his motion