Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 1999-CA-01432-SCT IN RE: ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN RAMMIE ABERNATHY, JR., DECEASED CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 1999-CA-01433-SCT IN RE: ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN RAMMIE ABERNATHY, JR., DECEASED CONSOLIDATED WITH NO.

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

SANDRA THOMAS * NO. 2025-CA-0449 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL KEVIN GRIFFIN-CLARK AND * THE HONORABLE DARREN FOURTH CIRCUIT P. LOMBARD * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

HUMPHREYS, Judge. Sandra D.T. Griffin (“Mrs. Griffin”) appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Sussex County (“circuit court”) denying her *743request for entry of a qualified domestic relations order (“QDRO”), which she pursues so that a certain term of her prior divorce decree might be enforced. For the following reas

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Sandra Griffin filed a petition for habeas relief in April of 1997. In September of 1998, the District Court dismissed her petition without prejudice as she had not exhausted her state remedies. When she returned to federal court in October of 1999, her re-filed petition was dismissed as untimely pursuant to the one-year limitations period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). In 2002

Opinion VOROS, Judge: 1 1 Ronald E. Griffin, an attorney, sued his former clients, Richard H. Cutler and Sandra S. Cutler, for nonpayment of legal fees. The trial court denied Griffin's fees on two grounds: that his claim was time-barred and that his fees were unreasonable. We affirm. BACKGROUND Li v. Cutler

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Sandra Maxwell Griffin, a state prisoner, filed a petition for habeas *649 corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on April 22, 1997, which was two days before her one-year period for filing for such relief was to expire. After tha

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION RODNEY GRIFFIN AND ANN * NO. 2021-C-0098 M. J. GRIFFIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS * WIFE OF RODNEY GRIFFIN COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA CARRINGTON PLACE, ******* PENT

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011). It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

OPINION REBECA HUDDLE, Justice. Sandra Brewer, a former employee of College of the Mainland, sued the College contending it retaliated against her for filing a complaint of sexual harassment by her supervisor. The trial court granted summary judgment in the College’s favor, and Brewer challenges that ruling on appeal. We affirm. B

213 P.3d 514 (2009) 2009-NMCA-066 Matthew James GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sandra PENN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 27,786. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. June 10, 2009. *515 Matthew James Griffin, Tehachapi, CA, Pro Se. Appellant Hatch, Allen & Shepherd, P.A., E.W. Shepherd, Amy M. Ca

667 F.Supp.2d 1340 (2009) Michael Allen GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. Walter A. McNEIL, Respondent. Case No. 08-22817-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 15, 2009. *1347 Linda McDermott, Esq., McClain & McDermott PA, Manors, FL, for Plaintiff. Sandra Sue Jaggard, Attorney General Office, Miami, FL, for D

In an action for divorce, equitable distribution, and other ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), dated November 7, 1984, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) awarded sole title, use and occupancy of the marital home to the plaintiff wife along with title and possession of the furnishing and personalty contained there

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Florida prisoner Michael Griffin asks us to reconsider the single-judge order denying him a certificate of appealability (COA). He argues that jurists of reason could debate whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) and 60(b)(6) permit him to challenge the district court’s judgment denying his § 2254 petition by seeking a retroactive application

861 A.2d 610 (2004) Jermaine L. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 99-CF-1484. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 5, 2004. Decided November 18, 2004. *611 Winsome G. Gayle, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Sandra K. Levick and Tracey D. Weaver, Public Defender Se

People v Griffin (2022 NY Slip Op 02652) People v Griffin 2022 NY Slip Op 02652 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

By Judge W. Allan Sharrett The Court must decide whether to sustain or overrule Defendant Kimberly S. Cowser-Griffin’s Demurrer. Facts This action arises out of David L. Griffin’s (the “decedent”) alleged failure to comply with a Separation and Property Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between Mr. Griffin and Sandra Griffin upon their divor