Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Sandlands C&D LLC v. Horry, County of”
Sandlands C & D LLC v. County of Horrypublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Duncan wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Diaz joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants Sandlands C & D, LLC (“Sandlands”) and Express Disposal Service, LLC (“EDS”) contest the validity of Horry County’s Flow Control Ordinance, which prohibits disposal of waste generated in Horry
SANDLANDS C & D, LLC v. County of Horrypublic domain
394 S.C. 451 (2011) 716 S.E.2d 280 SANDLANDS C & D, LLC, and Express Disposal Service, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF HORRY, a Political Subdivision of the State of South Carolina, acting by and through its duly elected County Council, and Horry County Solid Waste Authority, Inc., Defendants. No. 27042. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard May 24, 2
Colon Health Centers of America, LLC v. Hazelpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge WYNN joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Virginia’s certificate of need (CON) program governs the establishment and expansion of certain medical facilities inside the state. In this case two providers of medical imaging services, Colon Health Centers of America and
FEW, C.J. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) issued C & D Management Company a permit for a construction, demolition, and land-clearing debris landfill in York County. The County challenged that decision before the Administrative Law Court (ALC), which ruled in favor of C & D Management. The County appeals the ALC’s judgment, arguing DHEC impermissibly ignored a County ordinance pu
Christina Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courtspublic domain
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge HARRIS joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge. Christina Jacobs worked as a deputy clerk at a courthouse in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Although she allegedly suffered from social anxiety disorder, her employer assigned her to
Justyna Jensen v. Maryland Cannabis Administrationpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1216 Doc: 39 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1216 JUSTYNA JENSEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARYLAND CANNABIS ADMINISTRATION; WILLIAM TILBURG,
Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.public domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge, wrote a separate opinion as to Part TV, in which Judge KING concurred in the judgment: The Equal Protection Clause guarantees that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § l.13 It does not follow, however, that all classifications are forbidden. Instead, the Equal Protection Claus