Cases

Cite as 2020 Ark. 219 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-19-666 Opinion Delivered: May 28, 2020 SANDERS CARTER APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH

OPINION LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge. T1 Appellant Michael Lee Sanders was tried by jury and convicted of Possession of a Firearm After Former Conviction of a Felony (Count I) (21 0.8.8upp.2012, § 1283) and Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property After Former Conviction of a Felony (Count I1) (21 00.98.2011, § 1718), Case No. CF-2013-604, in the District C

PER CURIAM hln 1987, petitioner Sanders M. Carter was convicted by a jury of rape, aggravated robbery, and burglary. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to consecutive terms of imprisonment of life for rape and an aggregate sentence of forty years’ imprisonment for the other offenses. We affirmed. Carter v. State, 295 Ark. 218, 748 S.W.2d 127 (1988). <

348 S.W.3d 254 (2011) Larry SANDERS, Appellant, v. David WOOD, d/b/a Wood Engineering Company, Appellee. No. 06-11-00015-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted: July 27, 2011. Decided: August 12, 2011. *255 Charles H. Clark, Gregory S. Porter, Clark & Porter, Tyler, for appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marie Therese H. Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen her civil action against numerous defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Faltas’ motions for appointment of counse

ORDER PER CURIAM: Anthony D. Carter appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s ruling is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; ho

¶ 67. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. {dissenting). I believe that those who repeatedly operate a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) should have their record travel with them, no matter where in the country these offenses were committed. For instance, if the defendant had two prior OWI convictions in Illinois and was subsequently arrested in Wisconsin for OWI, the prior Illinois offenses should be counted for sentence enhancement

OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. Gary Donell Sanders did nothing to win Officer Shane Guthrie’s friendship when he spat on the back of Guthrie’s head as he sat in the back seat of Guthrie’s patrol car. As a result of this conduct, Sanders was convicted by a jury for harassment of a public servant and was sentenced to seven years’

857 N.E.2d 948 (2006) PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell L. SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-04-0551. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. November 6, 2006. *950 Robert Agostinelli, Deputy Defender (Court-appointed), Office of the State Appellate Defender, Ottawa, and Kenneth Hogan (Court-a

823 N.E.2d 313 (2005) George F. SANDERS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 02A03-0409-CR-400. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 4, 2005. Transfer Granted May 12, 2005. *315 John C. Bohdan, Deputy Public Defender, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorne

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her civil complaint against Defendants, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). Assa’ad-Faltas has also filed motions for injunctive relief

*1215OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary Michael Sanders appeals the trial court's granting of the State's second petition for reimbursement of investigative costs. We reverse. Issue Sanders raises two issues. We address the dispositive issue, which we restate as whether the trial court prope

825 N.E.2d 952 (2005) Jerrica L. SANDERS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 92A04-0410-CR-548. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 22, 2005. Transfer Denied July 13, 2005. *954 Patricia Caress McMath, Indianapolis, IN, for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana,

840 N.E.2d 319 (2006) George F. SANDERS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 02S03-0505-CR-222. Supreme Court of Indiana. January 12, 2006. *320 John C. Bohdan, Fort Wayne, for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Elizabeth Rogers, Deputy Attorney General, Indi

782 N.E.2d 1036 (2003) Marcus L. SANDERS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0206-CR-514. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 7, 2003. Lesa Lux Johnson, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. *1037 Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Monika Prekopa Talbot, Deputy Attorney Ge

240 S.W.3d 124 (2006) Sanders M. CARTER, Appellant, v. Larry NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee. No. 06-296. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 28, 2006. *125 Appellant, pro se. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Kelly K. Hill, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, AR, for appellee. PER CURIAM.

765 N.E.2d 591 (2002) Anthony SANDERS, Appellant (Petitioner Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Respondent Below). No. 49S02-0204-PC-223. Supreme Court of Indiana. April 3, 2002. Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Ruth Johnson, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Adam M

60 P.3d 1048 (2002) 2002 OK CR 42 Doyle Michael SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-2001-1350. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. December 19, 2002. Rob L. Pyron, Brad Carter, Seminole, OK, Counsel for Defendant at trial. William Peterson, District Attorney, Linda Evans, Terry Bard, Assistant District Attorney

764 N.E.2d 705 (2002) William A. SANDERS, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent. No. 45A03-0107-PC-232. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 6, 2002. *708 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, William D. Polanksy, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Steve Cart

MEMORANDUM ** Jonathan Carter appeals the district court’s order granting the Family and Child Treatment of Southern Nevada (“FACT”) and Clark County’s motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We affirm the dismissal of Clark County, but reverse and remand the dismissal of FACT. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history, we will not recount it here.</