Cases

80 Ariz. 339 (1956) 297 P.2d 927 The COLMENERO CANAL COMPANY, T.J. Price and Carl Matthews, Appellants, v. Ben BABERS, Appellee. No. 6112. Supreme Court of Arizona. May 29, 1956. *340 Garland & Sanders, Las Cruces, N.M., for appellants. Peterson & Richardson, Safford, for appellee. WI

At May Term, 1925, by consent, the action was referred under the following order: "In the above entitled case, by consent, it is ordered that this action be referred to David Isear, referee, who will take the testimony of such witnesses as may be offered by the parties hereto and report his findings of fact and conclusions of law thereon to this court. It is further ordered that if no exceptions are filed to the findings of fact and conclusions of law, then this action is remanded to the cler

People v Thomas (2023 NY Slip Op 01918) People v Thomas 2023 NY Slip Op 01918 Decided on April 13, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge Although the Court scheduled the hearing on December 5, 2018 to address Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the parties agreed that the question of injunctive relief should be consolidated with a final ruling on the merits of the action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this Decision and Order will be accompanied by a final judgment in favor of Defendants.

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 396 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document DIVISION IV 2023.07.12 13:24:18 -05'00' No. CV-20-689 2023.003.20215 Opinion Delivered October 20, 2021 DAVID HARDISTY APPEAL FROM THE BAXTER APPELLANT COUN

[Cite as Baber v. Mikolayczyk, 2025-Ohio-2910.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SANDUSKY COUNTY Matthew and Tara Court of Appeals No. S-24-022 Baber Trial Court No. 23 CV 0900 Appellees v. Paul Mikolayczyk DECISION AND JUDGMENT

JUDGE WEBB specially concurring. 18 While agreeing with the disposition of this appeal, I write separately to address an undecided question under Colorado law not mentioned by the majority: whether defendant waived his two trial error contentions by failing to either appeal those issues or cross-appeal them when the prosecution appealed his original sentence in People v. Notyce, (Colo.App. No. 09CA0999, 2010 WL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1426 Filed October 21, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ISAAC CHARLES BROWN III, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Floyd County, Colleen D. Weiland, Judge. Isaac Brown III appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree and willful

719 F.Supp.2d 636 (2010) Ruben LAROTA-FLOREZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01:09cv1181. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. April 8, 2010. *637 Christopher E. Brown, Brown Brown & Brown, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiffs. Jason Emmanue

[Cite as State v. Barber, 2021-Ohio-1506.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-190338 TRIAL NO. B-1701852-A Plaintiff-Appellee, : : O P I N I O N. vs. : DEONT

Quillian, J. We will first consider whether the trial judge erred in striking the defendant’s answers. The answers alleged that the parties agreed to hold the checks and not present them to the bank until the books had been audited and the exact figure of the purchase had been ascertained. Delivery of an instrument may be conditional. “ ‘As between immediate parties, and as regards a remote party other than a holder in due course

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1036 _________________

520 F.Supp.2d 777 (2007) WESTERN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGIANCE TITLE & ESCROW, INC., and Atlantic Coast Home Builders, Inc., Defendants. Action No. 2:07cv83. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. October 16, 2007. *778 *779 Jonathan L. Hauser, Esq

LOCKEMY, J. In this property dispute, Elgie and Larry Moore appeal the trial court’s decision to grant relief to Barbara B. Danley Williams, Sylvia H. Durant Cotton, Janie Durant Ancrum, Tricia Durant Middleton, and Carolyn Durant White (collectively known as Respondents). Specifically, the Moores argue the trial court erred in: (1) basing its decision on the incorrect survey; (2) denying the Moores’ motion for directed verd

793 F.Supp.2d 761 (2011) Michael MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. AT & T MOBILITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-699-RMG. United States District Court, D. South Carolina. June 6, 2011. *763 A. Christopher Potts, Hitchcock and Potts, Charleston, SC, Dirk D. Beuth, Neal A. Sanders, Neal Sanders Law Office, Butler, PA, for Plaintif

OPINION AND ORDER DOUGLAS E. MILLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Amanda Deanne Smith (“Smith”), filed this action to recover for injuries arising from her arrest at the home of a friend on September 21, 2006. She has alleged state law tort claims, and constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against two officers involved in the arrest, Officer R.R. Ray (“Officer Ray”) a

DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, Senior United States District Judge *101Pending before the Court are the following motions: (a) APS Healthcare of Puerto Rico, Inc. 's ("APS Healthcare") Motion for Summary Judgment filed at Docket No. 141; (b) Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendant APS Healthcare of Puerto Rico, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, at

56 F.Supp.2d 1334 (1999) Corine ZEIGLER, individually and as the parent and next friend of Kacheal Zeigler, a minor, Plaintiff, v. ELMORE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, d/b/a Elmore Community Hospital; and Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 98-T-1309-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 27, 1999.

125 P.3d 452 (2005) Donald P. HICKS, Petitioner, v. Kent T. LONDRE; Jennifer A. Londre; and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Respondents. No. 04SC741. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. December 19, 2005. Rehearing Denied January 9, 2006. *454 James R. Florey, Jr., Castle Rock, for Petitioner. Hamil-

694 S.E.2d 555 (2010) The PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN the DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA v. TRURO CHURCH, et al. The Episcopal Church v. Truro Church, et al. Record Nos. 090682, 090683. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 10, 2010. *557 George A. Somerville (Bradfute W. Davenport, Jr., Richmond; Mary C. Zinsner, McLean; Joshua D.