Cases

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 810] denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On March 10, 2008, the claimant, Earnestine Sanders, applied for social security insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, a period of disability under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The claimant alleges disability com

OPINION and ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Johnice Sanders seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq. The court has jurisdiction over this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge. Claimant Cleo Sanders (“Claimant”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking summary reversal or remand of the final decision by Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Claimant’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Claimant raises the following i

MEMORANDUM ** Ronnie Sanders appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment on Sanders’s action challenging the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) order denying his application for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income payments. The ALJ concluded Sanders had a severe impairment within the meaning of the regulations, but t

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MARY BECK BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Ronald Sanders appeals from a district court order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. I Mr. Sanders applied for benefits after suffering a series of traumatic events, in

674 F.3d 1062 (2012) Michael BROCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner, Defendant-Appellee. No. 11-2496. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 10, 2012. Filed: March 28, 2012. *1063 Eugene Gregory Wallace, argued, Raleigh, NC, Anthony W. Bartels, o

ORDER Sharon Froncheck contests the denial of social security disability benefits that she sought after suffering a stroke. The Administrative Law Judge denied the application after determining that Froncheck was gainfully employed as the owner and operator of a tavern during the time she claimed to be disabled. We agree with the district court that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s denial. According to her a

695 F.Supp.2d 729 (2010) Karen S. LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 1:09-cv-078. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 2, 2010. *731 Gary Marc Blumenthal, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff. John J. Stark, US Attorney Office, Columbus, OH, Henry

496 F.3d 833 (2007) Lee Ann SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-3930. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 4, 2007. Decided August 8, 2007. *834 *835 Frederick J. Daley, Jr., Hea

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Kevin E. Byes applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income on July 30, 2007, claiming disability since November 2005. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) upheld the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. The district court 1 agreed. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 129

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Fee (“plaintiff’) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to a period of Social Security disability and disabi

*1016ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff Julian Gonzales (“Gonzales”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his

Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge Nearly four years ago, in April 2014, Gwendolyn Sanders filed applications for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"), Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"), and Disabled Widow's Benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act"). 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i),

ORDER CORRECTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge. On December 10, 2012; the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation in this case (“the findings”). In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration of the Un

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion To Remand. Clerk’s 12. Plaintiff resisted the motion arguing that a reversal with an award of benefits is the appropriate remedy. Clerk’s 13. Defendant filed a reply to Plaintiffs resistance again arguing that the case should be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative review and a new decision

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR., Senior District Judge. Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), has filed a timely objection [Doc. 25] to a Recommended Ruling filed by Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis [Doc. 24], Plaintiff Nancy E. Koutrakos defends the Recommended Ruling. [Doc. 26]. This Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHERYL A. EIFERT, United States Magistrate Judge. This action seeks a review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (hereinafter “Commissioner”) denying Claimant’s applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID C. GUADERRAMA, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a civil action seeking judicial review of an administrative decision. Plaintiff, Carmen Acosta (“Acosta”), appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Purs

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Nelson Norman brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“SSA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), to seek review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”) denying his application for Social Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Both plaintiff and the defendant