Cases

Sanchez v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 07468) Sanchez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 07468 Decided on December 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

Sanchez v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00446) Sanchez v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00446 Decided on January 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

Sanchez v City of New York (2020 NY Slip Op 01970) Sanchez v City of New York 2020 NY Slip Op 01970 Decided on March 19, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

Sanchez v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 07355) Sanchez v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 07355 Decided on October 10, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

Sanchez v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 00538) Sanchez v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 00538 Decided on January 24, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. (2023 NY Slip Op 00914) Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. 2023 NY Slip Op 00914 Decided on February 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. (2022 NY Slip Op 04078) Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. 2022 NY Slip Op 04078 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu

Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. (2020 NY Slip Op 05270) Matter of Sanchez v New York City Tr. Auth. 2020 NY Slip Op 05270 Decided on October 1, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to deem a late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tune, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Landicino, J.), dated January 9, 2013, which granted the petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the petition is denied. In determining whether to deem

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to deem a late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tune, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Landicino, J.), dated January 9, 2013, which granted the petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the petition is denied. In determining whether to deem

In this wrongful death action, plaintiff-administratrix Lidia Sanchez is the natural mother of the 28-year-old decedent Luisa *502Sanchez, who died approximately 10 months after being struck by a sanitation truck operated by defendant Noel Betancourt. Betancourt testified that he never saw decedent before the accident. An accident reconstruction expert called by plaintiff testified that Betancourt

In this wrongful death action, plaintiff-administratrix Lidia Sanchez is the natural mother of the 28-year-old decedent Luisa *502Sanchez, who died approximately 10 months after being struck by a sanitation truck operated by defendant Noel Betancourt. Betancourt testified that he never saw decedent before the accident. An accident reconstruction expert called by plaintiff testified that Betancourt

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence and direct that a new trial be held on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the motion denied. In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff alleges that he fell wh

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered April 30, 2010, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiffs left foot and calf fell into a gap between the subway car she was exiting and the platform, denied defendant New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant failed to meet its burde

*577General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) authorizes a court, in its discretion, to grant leave to serve an amended notice of claim where the error in the original notice was made in good faith and where the other party has not been prejudiced thereby. Here, there is no indication that the typographical error in setting forth the accident date in the original notice of claim was made in bad faith. Moreo

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul A. Victor, J.), entered May 23, 2007, which, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order denying the motion by defendant South Bronx Community Management (SBCM) for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 9, 2006, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by appeal from the subsequent order on reargument. Plaintiffs

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered March 1, 2006, which, in an action arising out of the execution of a search warrant at plaintiffs’ home, denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the settlement of the action insofar as made on behalf of the infant plaintiff, and to sever the remainder of the action brought on behalf of the other two plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The record does not

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Board of Education of the City of New York, Kenneth Hernandez, and Alex Ortiz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated July 19, 2004, as denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the defendant City of New York

Sanchez-Pesantez v City of New York - 2026 NY Slip Op 02223 skip to main content It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website. Law Reporting Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, Sta

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Paul’s Auto Maintenance appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated February 15, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the co