Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s application for cancellation

MEMORANDUM* Eliseo Catarino-Sanchez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a highway traffic stop. The district court’s denial of a motion to suppress is reviewed de novo and its factual findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Garcia, 205 F. 3d 1182, 1186 (9th Cir.2000). Whether an officer had reasonable suspicion to detain a sus

MORRIS ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. After James Phillips fell from the top bunk in his cell at the Jasper County, Missouri, jail, he filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accusing various jail employees and the jail’s doctor of violating his constitutional rights. The district court denied Mr. Phillips’s requests for appointed counsel. Later in the proceeding,' the court granted the d

ORDER KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge. This cause is before this Court on the following motions: 1. Appellee Nathurst’s Motion to Compel Service of Appellant’s Brief on Appel-lee Nathurst (Dkt. No. 10.). 2. Appellee Nathurst’s Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Responsive Brief (Dkt. No. 10).

Case: 22-20337 Document: 00516909260 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2020 IL App (1st) 171484 SIXTH DIVISION October 23, 2020 No. 1-17-1484 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

[Cite as Sanchez v. Sanchez, 2016-Ohio-4933.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ANGELA SANCHEZ, : APPEAL NO. C-150441 TRIAL NO. DV1401196 Petitioner-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. HUGO SANCHE

OPINION This is an appeal from a no-evidence summary judgment in favor of the State Office of Risk Management (SORM). At issue is whether Twilah Sanchez produced sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that her husband was not intoxicated at the time of his work-related accident. Because we conclude she did not, we affirm. FACTUAL SUMMARY On November 15, 2002, Raul Sanchez was re

[Cite as State v. Sanchez, 2020-Ohio-1171.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 19CA011507 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE MARK SAN

712 Argued and submitted on September 24, 2020, resubmitted en banc March 29, reargued and submitted August 3, 2022; convictions on Counts 1 through 5 reversed, convictions on Counts 6 through 9 reversed and remanded with instruction to enter a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration (Count 6) and one count of first-degree sexual abuse (Count 7), remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed March 22, 202

STEPHENS, Judge. Procedural History and Evidence On 21 September 2009, Defendant James Anthony Carr was indicted for the first-degree murder of Sergio Sanchez, four counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon, and one count of conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon. The evidence at trial tended to show the following: In the early morning hours of 12 April 2008, Defendant, his girlfr

[Cite as State v. Carr, 2013-Ohio-5312.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 12CA3358 : Plaintiff-Appellee, : : DECISION AND v. : JUDGMENT ENTRY

The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam,: Defendant Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and his brother, Jonathan D. Carr, were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for crimes committed in a series of three incidents in December 2000 in Wichita. This is R. Carr’s direct appeal from his 50 convictions and 4 death sentences. In the first incident on December 7 and 8, Andrew S

ON APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING This court's opinion of December 14, 1988 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor. This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit for an alleged breach of a post-partnership dissolution agreement and for contribution for the net-losses suffered by the partnership during its term. In February, 1977, appellant, Richard Sanchez, and appellee,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-24,047-14 EX PARTE JUAN JORGE SANCHEZ, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1990CR0627-W13 IN THE 227TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 1

SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Isidro Muniz-Sanchez's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 17. The Government opposes the motion. ECF No. 25. Given evolving case law on this issue, the Court permitted supplemental briefing to be filed no later than July 8, 2019. Both parties supplemented their briefs. See ECF Nos. 35 & 36. As the Court finds oral argument unwarranted, it consider

Opinion PERLUSS, P. J. Marquise Daniel Carr appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by a jury on two counts of first degree murder and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The jury also found true two special circumstances allegations related to the murder counts—that Carr had committed multiple murders and was an active participant in a criminal street gang at the time of t

Standridge, J.: Amy Sanchez, individually and as next friend of her son, Austin Sanchez (Plaintiffs), sued Unified School District No. 469 (USD 469); Kerry Brungardt, the Lansing Middle School principal; and two students and their parents seeking damages allegedly resulting from the students' bullying of Austin. Eventually, the only claim that remained was Plaintiffs’ claim of neg

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V PEDRO SÁNCHEZ CERTIORARI SANTANA y Otros procedente del Peticionario Tribunal de Primera Instancia Carolina KLCE202301245 V. Caso Núm