Cases

(2008) SanDisk Corp., Plaintiff, v. PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP., Silicon Motion Technology Corp., Silicon Motion, Inc. (Taiwan), Silicon Motion, Inc. (California), Silicon Motion International, Inc., Synergistic Sales, Inc., USBest Technology, Inc., Skymedi Corp., Zotek Electronic Co., Ltd., Zodata Technology Ltd., Infotech Logistic LLC, Power Quotient International Co., Ltd., PQI Corp., PNY Technologies, Inc., Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingsto

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiff SanDisk Corp. holds a number of patents covering flash memory technology that it licenses to companies under broad licensing agreements. Defendants Kingston Technology Co., Inc. and Kingston Technology Corp. (hereafter Kingston) refused to enter into the agreements and instead pursued this action against SanDisk, alleging that the required license

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1620 VICOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. FII USA INC., a/k/a FOXCONN INDUSTRIAL INTERNET USA INC.; INGRASYS TECHNOLOGY INC.; INGRASYS TECHNOLOGY USA INC., Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASS

In the United States Court of Federal Claims UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff, No. 18-357 v. Filed August 26, 2025 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Jeffrey S. Rasmussen, Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP, Louisville, CO, for plaintiff. Ashley M. Carter, Civil Divisi

691 F.Supp.2d 915 (2010) GRICE ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, v. JG INNOVATIONS, INC. and Gordon "Jack" Grice, Defendants. No. 09-cv-632-vis.[1] United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. March 4, 2010. *917 Adam Louis Marchuk, Michael Osterhoff, Joseph C. Wylie, II, K & L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.</