Cases

Cite as 2021 Ark. 7 Digitally signed by Susan P. Williams SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-20-216 Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Date: 2021.08.18 14:17:49 -05'00' Opinion Delivered: January 28, 2021 CONVENT CORPORATION A

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 01-09-00328-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-03-257 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) )

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

733 F.Supp.2d 943 (2010) Jason HUGHES, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, and Wayne Lipski, Defendants. No. 09 C 4734. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 6, 2010. *944 Leigh Robbin Handelman, P

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability on Its Sixth Claim for Relief (Unlawful Declinar tion of Proposed FY 2016 AFA), filed July 29, 2016 (Doc. 196)(“ MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 16, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Defendants (c

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents interesting questions regarding the meaning of confidentiality agreements entered into by two industry rivals at a time when both were intrigued by the possibility of a friendly merger and when neither wished to be the subject of an unsolicited offer by the other or a third-party industry rival.

ACCEPTED 05-15-00495-CV 05-15-00495-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/17/2015 8:35:00 AM LISA MATZ

Table of Contents Topic Page No. I. Introduction .........................................................1128 II.The Basic Requirements for a Deferred, Like-Kind Exchange Under Section 1031........................................................1130 III. The Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Other, Non-Party Players..............1139 A.

*91 Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: * Introduction On the evening of August 11, 1967, local law enforcement officials of Pike County, Kentucky,

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

347 F.Supp.2d 769 (2004) In re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 01-CV-11115 MJP(CWX). United States District Court, CD. California, Western Division. May 11, 2004. *774 Bruce L. Simon, Joseph W. Cotchett, Peter E. Borkon, Mark Cotton Molumphy, Steven N. Williams, Cotchett Pitre Simon & McCarthy, Burlingame, CA, Clifford

ACCEPTED 03-15-00248-CV 7124709 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

178 F.Supp.2d 198 (2001) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATED, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Liggett Group, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company, British American Tobacco, Ltd. Defendants. No. 98 CV 3287(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 19, 2001.