Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Samuel Green and Doris v. Green”
Dickey Porter and Doris Porter v. Joshua Robert McGuffee Service First, Inc. and Travelers Property and Casualtypublic domain
Judgment rendered August 28, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,845-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** DICKEY PORTER AND DORIS Plaintiffs
Samuel A. Newton A/K/A Samuel E. Ashley and Kai Lynn O'Neal v. Joe D. Newton, II 2003 Trustpublic domain
NUMBER 13-22-00522-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG SAMUEL A. NEWTON A/K/A SAMUEL E. ASHLEY AND KAI LYNN O’NEAL, Appellants, v. JOE D. NEWTON, II 2003 TRUST, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of McLennan County
Green v. Russo, 96-4811 (1999)public domain
DECISION In this action to quiet title, the parties dispute the ownership of approximately 3.91 acres of land between their two abutting parcels, located in North Smithfield, Rhode Island. The plaintiff, Doris Green (Green), seeks a judgment declaring her ownership. The defendant John Russo (Russo), counterclaims, asserting that he has acquired the subject property in dispute by adverse possession. This matter was heard on A
Samuel Rene Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-07-00527-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI<
Samuel Rene Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-07-00527-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SAMUEL RENE GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED July 2, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk SAMUEL R. ADAMS, e t a l . , ) KNOX CHANCERY
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
914 F.2d 525 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,260, 17 Fed.R.Serv.3d 737 Sandra L. BLUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,andMattiebelle C. Harris, Samuel P. Sheppard, Edward R.Humphrey, Robert L. Evans, Beulah Mae Harris, LeonettaBibby, Annette Todd, William Kincy, James T. Love, ManuelEarly, Bernard Fields, Betty Reid, Lynn Siler, Lelia Walker,Thelma Curry, John Smith, James N. Fleming, GeraldineBallew, Robert B
512 F.2d 37 Jeffrey HART, as a minor by his parent and next friend,Doris Hart, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, NEW YORK SCHOOLDISTRICT #21, a body corporate, et al.,Defendants-Appellees-Appellants,Irving Anker, Chancellor of the Board of Education of theCity of New York, Defendant-Appellee.The COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK SCHOOLDISTRICT #21, by its Presiden
Sherrill v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.public domain
410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
269 F.2d 255 AMERICAN SAFETY TABLE COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,v.Joseph SCHREIBER and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants.AMERICAN SAFETY TABLE COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joseph SCHREIBER and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, Defendants-Appellants. No. 16
991 F.2d 1195 Sharon L. NICHOLS, David R. Nichols, Virginia Ann Callan,Charles Oliver Richardson, III, Marilyn Goodman, Thomas J.Goodman, Debra A. Lopez, Rudolph Lopez, Sharon RuthAnderson, Rosemary Madrid Castaneda, Jesse Castaneda, KarenLeslie-Lloyd, Jacqueline Templin, Katherine Galati Novick,Karen Janet Davis, Peggy Lee Patterson, Michelle James,Patricia Ann Ehlert, Dana Messerly, Raymond Leroy Messerly,Susan Gail Pa
McFARLAND v. ROBERTS Et Al.public domain
BARNES, Presiding Judge. Robert P. McFarland appeals the superior court’s order confirming an arbitration award and entry of judgment against him. He argues that the court erred because the award by the State Bar Committee on the Arbitration of Attorney Fee Disputes (“the Committee”) did not correctly interpret well-established contract law and