Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Samuel Gene Miller, II”
State v. Michael Gene Wiskowskipublic domain
2024 WI 23 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP2105-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael Gene Wiskowski, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINI
State v. Michael Gene Wiskowskipublic domain
2024 WI 23 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP2105-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael Gene Wiskowski, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINI
Joseph Gene Thompson v. Susanne Rose Ouellettepublic domain
2023 WI App 7 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP1087 Complete Title of Case: IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: JOSEPH GENE THOMPSON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. SUSANNE ROSE OUELLETTE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, V.
United States v. Gene Jirakpublic domain
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Gene Jirak was convicted on five counts: (1) making a false claim for a tax refund on January 9, 2009; (2) making a false claim for a tax refund on March 27, 2009; (3) uttering a forged treasury check on March 9, 2009; (4) mail fraud in Janúary 2009; and (5) aggravated identity theft on January 9, 2009. He appeals his conviction on multiple grounds. Having jur
Miller v. Campbell Countypublic domain
THOMAS, Justice. The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the eva
Motta v. Samuel Weiser, Inc.public domain
598 F.Supp. 941 (1984) Marcelos Ramos MOTTA and Society Ordo Templi Orientis, Plaintiffs, v. SAMUEL WEISER, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 81-0459-P. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 6, 1984. *942 Robert E. Mittel, Michael P. Asen, Mittel & Hefferan, Portland, Me., for plaintiffs. James S. Erwin, James R. Er
In Re H.K. Porter Co.public domain
156 B.R. 16 (1993) In re H.K. PORTER COMPANY, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 91-468PGH. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. July 7, 1993. *17 Philip E. Beard, George T. Snyder, Philip E. Beard, II, Frederick J. Francis, Pittsburgh, PA, for debtor. Douglas A. Campbell, David P. Braun, Pittsburgh, PA, for the Official Committ
Miller v. Campbell Countypublic domain
901 P.2d 1107 (1995) H. Douglas MILLER and Danene R. Miller, individually and as conservator(s) of Laura K. Miller, Lindy L. Miller and Clint T. Miller, minors; Steve Adams and Peggy Adams, individually and as conservator(s) of Christie Adams and Jamie Adams, minors; Scott G. Anderson and Tobey J. Anderson, individually and as conservator(s) of Michael Todd Anderson, Chanel S. Anderson, and Tobin P. Anderson, minors; Paul D. Bailey, Jr.; Roxanne G. Randa
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Dueker v. First Midwest Bank of Poplar Bluffpublic domain
223 S.W.3d 181 (2007) Lonnie F. DUEKER and Patricia A. Dueker and John L. Shannon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIRST MIDWEST BANK OF POPLAR BLUFF, Gene Shain and Earl J. Miller and Juanita Miller, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents. No. 27530. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. May 21, 2007. *182 Mary
Holt v. Stihl, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp. 693 (1977) Thomas Dewey HOLT, Plaintiff, v. STIHL, INC., et al., Defendants. STIHL, INC., Plaintiff-by-cross-claim, v. Andreas Stihl MASCHINEFABRIK, Defendant-by-cross-claim. No. CIV-2-77-23. United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division. November 22, 1977. *694 Gene P. Gaby and Thom
Kerrie Mick v. Wes Rainespublic domain
HOLMES, District Judge. *1077 Plaintiff Kerrie Gene Mick appeals the judgment of the district court. 2 Three orders are before us on appeal. The first granted the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Porter Hensen, Wade Wilken
Dueker v. Gillpublic domain
175 S.W.3d 662 (2005) Lonnie F. DUEKER and Patricia A. Dueker, and John L. Shannon, Appellants, v. Samuel L. GILL, First Midwest Bank of Poplar Bluff, N. A., Gene Shain, Earl J. Miller and Juanita Miller, Respondents. No. 26591. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 7, 2005. *664 Mary Eftink Boner,
JJJJ Walker, LLC v. Yollickpublic domain
SUBSTITUTE OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. We deny the appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion and judgment dated June 5, 2014, and issue this substitute opinion in its place. In this fraud case, the plaintiffs prevailed in their claims against a bank, the bank’s corporate agent, and the bank’s attorney, but the trial court granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Samuel Christopher Hawkins v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Correctionspublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Samuel Christopher Hawkins represents himself in this court, urging that his conviction of capital murder and sentence of death by a Lubbock County, Texas, jury should be set aside for three reasons. He argues that his “trial was had by use of perjured testimony[,] ... [t]he confession was extracted and obtained in violation of petitione
238 F.3d 567 (4th Cir. 2001) GENE A. YOUNG, SR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GENE A. YOUNG, JR.; PHYLLIS YOUNG, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,V.CITY OF MOUNT RANIER; JODY SHEGAN, SERGEANT, MOUNT RANIER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; RAYMOND BUNNER, DEPUTY SHERIFF, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; CITY OF COTTAGE CITY; ROBERT SZABO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES,ANDPRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY; CO
Robb, Judge. Case Summary and Issues [1] Lockerbie Glove Factory Town Home Owners Association, Inc., and eight residents of the townhomes (collectively "Remonstrators") appeal a decision by the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission ("Commission") granting a certificate of appropriateness to Dan Jacobs for the purpose of constructing a retail, residential, a
Dehart v. Jonespublic domain
Michael Wayne Adley, Marc W. Judice, Judice and Adley, P.O. Drawer 51769, Lafayette, LA 70505-1769, Telephone: (337) 235-2405, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Todd C. Ackal, M.D. Alan K. Breaud, Breaud & Meyers, P.O. Drawer 3448, Lafayette, LA 70502, Telephone: (337) 266-2200, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Bruce A. Jones, M.D. James Calvin Young, Law Offices of Sheryl Story, S. Micholle Mordock, One Galleria Boulevar
Mahmoud v. Taylorpublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 522–655 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
United States v. State of Idahopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO