Cases

357 S.C. 454 (2004) 593 S.E.2d 606 Steven DUKES, Appellant, v. Thomas E. REDMOND and Florence County Board of Canvassers, Respondents. No. 25787. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard February 3, 2004. Decided March 1, 2004. *456 Samuel W. Howell, IV, of Howell & Linkous, LLC, of Char

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Hall and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commission aff

SAMUEL BARKER * NO. 2022-C-0629 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL H2 LAW, LLC AND AUTUMN * HARRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO CI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WILLIS DUKES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-4149 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 1, 2017. A

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. June 26, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Cour

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in July 18, 2025 the bound volume of the Official Reports. Samuel A. Christensen Clerk of Court of Appeals A party may file with the Supr

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-17-00154-CR SAMUEL TUCKER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 27898

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 4, 2025 Decided April 18, 2025 No. 23-7141 SAMUEL SHANKS, APPELLANT v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, APPELLEE Consolidated with 23-7145 Appeals from the United States District Cour

Samuel, Son & Co., Inc. v Cela (2018 NY Slip Op 05889) Samuel, Son & Co., Inc. v Cela 2018 NY Slip Op 05889 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Report

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-22-00351-CV MICHAEL R KEENAN, ET UX, RAMONA L. KEENAN, APPELLANTS V. THOMAS SAMUEL ROBIN, MARY MARGOT CONNOR, DUSTIN WAYNE LUBBOCK, MEREDITH C. LUBBOCK, AND LAZY LR CATTLE COMPANY LLC, APPELLEES On Appeal from the 251st District C

02/23/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 31, 2018 Session IN RE: SAMUEL P. Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. Y0740 William A. Peeler, Special Judge No. W2016-01665-COA-R3-JV This ap

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2022-KA-0742 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL SAMUEL M. HUNTER JR * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL

BY JUDGE R. TERRENCE NEY This matter came before the Court on June 23, 2004, pursuant to Complainant Samuel ! White, P.C.’s (“ Trustee” ) Motion for Aid and Direction as to ownership of property located at 8633 Sacramento Drive in Alexandria, Virginia. ! Facts In early 2000, Victor Cruz and Marlene Cardozo agreed to purchase 8633 Sacramento Drive (“ Sacramento Property” ) from

Chief Justice Hecht announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which Justice Brown and Justice Blacklock joined. While married to Amanda Bradshaw, Barney Samuel Bradshaw was convicted and sentenced to 60 years in prison for the continuous sexual abuse 1 of Amanda's daughter, who was younger than 14 years old at the

Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 49 and 50) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. *105649) and Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50). For t

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 14, 2016 Decided August 2, 2016 Reissued August 11, 2017 No. 15-5008 SAMUEL ORTIZ-DIAZ, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, APPELLEE Appeal from the

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This cause is before the Court upon Defendant Nova Biomedical Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] and Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations [ECF No. 9]. The Court has reviewed the Motions, all supporting and opposing filings, and the

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

09/20/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 12, 2019 IN RE ESTATE OF HENRY C. ELLIS, III AND IN RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF HENRY C. ELLIS, III Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004270-18, CT-003838-18 Gina C. Higgins,

Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I agree with the majority’s rationale as it concerns the attorney-fee matters but dissent relative to the class treatment as it was administered by the trial court. I. Preface Initially, the majority’s overarching approach to this appeal appears to suggest liberality in favor of class certification. I have no objection, to the degree that this doe