⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Samuel Allen Norris”

District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007-05-22 · Published · cited 3× · 501 F. Supp. 2d 1092; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37258; 2007 WL 1513820
501 F.Supp.2d 1092 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gary P. NORRIS, Defendant. No. 2:06-cr-243-JDH-NMK. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 22, 2007. *1093 *1094 Samuel Bernard Weiner, Columbus, OH, for Defendant. Daniel Allen Brown, United State
Allen v. Schiffpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-12-07 · Published · cited 7× · 908 F. Supp. 2d 451; 2012 WL 6097702; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181039
MEMORANDUM DECISION BRICCETTI, District Judge: Plaintiff Lillian Allen brings this Section 1983 civil rights action, alleging violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments against Sullivan County (“County”) and Michael Schiff, the Sullivan County Sheriff, in both his individual and official capacities. Plaintiff also brings claims under New York State Human Rights Law and the Labor Managem
Allen v. Giffordpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973-05-15 · Published · cited 5× · 368 F. Supp. 317; 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13642
368 F.Supp. 317 (1973) Jesse L. ALLEN and Constance G. Allen, Plaintiffs, v. Lee A. GIFFORD and Charles R. Samuels, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 497-71-N. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. May 15, 1973. *318 Stanley E. Sacks, Sacks, Sacks & Tavss, Norfolk, Va., for plaintiffs. Norris E. Halpern
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972-06-21 · Published · cited 22× · 462 F.2d 615; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8856
PER CURIAM: Jesse L. Allen and Constance G. Allen appeal from an order of the district court which held that their complaint charging racial discrimination in the sale of real estate in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1982 was barred by Virginia’s one-year statute of limitations. The complaint, which seeks compensatory and punitive damages
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-11-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2005 Session STEVEN A. EDWARDS, ET AL. v. NANCY ALLEN, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 03-6806CV Robert E. Corlew, III, Chancellor No. M2004-01944-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 28, 2005 Plaintiffs appeal the action of the trial court in granting Defend
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED July 2, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk SAMUEL R. ADAMS, e t a l . , ) KNOX CHANCERY
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2022-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 9, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00186-CV REGINA ANN VARKEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANIL C. VARKEY, DECEASED AND ANGELINA GINA VARKEY, Appellants V. DR. AYYASH Y. MELHEM, MD; HYE JUNG LEE, RN; TENAKA M. BASILE, RN; AND SAMUEL
Ohio Supreme Court · 2024-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 2787; 177 Ohio St. 3d 431
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 431.] BERKHEIMER, APPELLANT, v. REKM, L.L.C., D.B.A. WINGS ON BROOKWOOD ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Berkheimer v. REKM, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2787.] Civil law—Negligence—Suppliers of food—In negligence cases involving an injurious substance in food, the correct analysis is that adopted in Allen v. Grafton—No breach of duty occurs when consumer could have r
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 871 A.2d 1248
ORDER PER CURIAM. The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 582 Pa. 403; 871 A.2d 1248; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 852
ORDER PER CURIAM. The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-30 · Published · cited 75× · 600 U.S. 551
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 551–569 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 222 F. App'x 255
PER CURIAM: Larry O. Easter appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* Easter v. Virginia, No. 4:05-cv-00162-HCM (E.D.Va. Sept 5, 2006; Oct. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2022-05-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 TN WC 42
FILED May 24, 2022 09:32 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993-05-24 · Published · cited 58× · 994 F.2d 279; 71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1979; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11933; 1993 WL 169776
MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff William A. Kinnie appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant United States of America in Kinnie’s action seeking recovery of penalties assessed and collected by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) under 26 U.S.C. § 6672. On appeal, the issues are (1) whether Kinnie was a responsible person who willfully failed
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 15 2024, 9:23 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
California Court of Appeal · 1994-09-26 · Published · cited 26× · 28 Cal. App. 4th 776; 35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 13; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7364; 94 Daily Journal DAR 13477; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 967
28 Cal.App.4th 776 (1994) 35 Cal. Rptr.2d 13 MARK ABELSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. A053939. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. September 26, 1994. *780 COUNSEL Cotch
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 777 So. 2d 322; 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 109; 2000 WL 869517
I disagree with the majority opinion affirming the appellant's conviction. The language of the indictment charged the appellant with first-degree rape, alleging that the victim was under the age of 12. However, the appellant pled guilty to second-degree rape, acknowledging that the victim was between the ages of 12 and 16. Therefore, under the facts of this case, second-degree rape was not a lesser included offense of first-degree rape. See Ross v. State, 529 So.2d 10
District Court, D. Utah · 1984-05-10 · Published · cited 35× · 588 F. Supp. 247; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16822
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007-01-12 · Published · cited 11× · 962 So. 2d 183; 2007 Ala. LEXIS 16; 2007 WL 80826
Facts and Procedural History Robert Rester worked as a millwright at a foundry owned and operated by McWane, Inc., and its subsidiary, Union Foundry Company, for 24 years until his employment was terminated on September 19, 2002. During his employment, Rester witnessed numerous safety and environmental hazards, including the lack of doors on control panels, exposed wires in the ceilings, the lack of safety switches on overhead cranes, and the lack of belt gu