Cases

COLLOTON, Circuit Judgé. James Edward Smith, an inmate of the Arkansas Department of Correction, filed suit against Sammy D. Johnson, a corree- *869 tional officer, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of Smith’s Eighth Amendment rights. Smith asserts that Johnson and another officer acted w

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

DEITS, P.J. Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, arguing that the trial court erred in imposing a 214-year term of post-prison supervision. We remand for resentencing. On defendant’s plea of guilty, the trial court convicted him of one count of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. At sentencing, the trial court determined that defendant’

DAVIS, J., dissenting: I need to make clear at the outset that I support the prior decisions of this Court holding that an expert may provide evidence on the battered woman’s syndrome when a defendant asserts self-defense in a homicide prosecution. I believe such evidence is critical in domestic abuse situations where a spouse is forced to protect herself from imminent death or serious bodily injury. The facts o

OPINION JIM R. BRIGHT, CHIEF JUSTICE The disagreement that underlies this appeal arises from the purchase and sale of a eottoh crop in Dawson County for the crop *517 year 2010. After a jury trial, and in accordance with answers to questions presented to it by the trial cour

503 F.3d 284 (2007) COUNCIL TREE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; Bethel Native Corporation; The Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, Petitioners v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America, Respondents CTIA-Wireless Association and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Intervenor. No. 06-2943. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 23, 2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Page I. The Parties......................................... 226 II. The Facts..................................... 227 III. The Causes of Action.................................................................... 231 IV. The Special Verdicts ..........„.......................................

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-28-2007 Council Tree Comm v. FCC Precedential or Non-P

OPINION YOCK, Judge. These consolidated civilian pay cases1 are before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of certain plaintiffs on collateral estoppel grounds and on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ seven claims.2 For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of 227

107 S.E.2d 772 (1959) STATE ex rel. Donald C. TONEY v. Okey A. MILLS, Sheriff of Raleigh County. No. 11053. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 10, 1959. Decided March 17, 1959. *773 William G. Thompson, Montgomery, for relator. W. W. Barron, Atty. Gen., Anthony J. Sparacino, Pros. A

737 F.2d 1 237 U.S.App.D.C. 219 Julius HOBSON, et al.v.Jerry WILSON, Thomas J. Herlihy, Jack Acree, ChristopherScrapper, Edward Jagen, John Mahaney & GeorgeSuter, Appellants,John B. Layton, et al.Julius HOBSON, et al.v.Jerry WILSON, et al.Charles D. Brennan, Courtland J. Jones, Gerald T. Grimaldi,George C. Moore & Gerould W. Pangburn, Appellants.Julius HOBSON, et al.

410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772