Cases

338 B.R. 716 (2006) In re Edward Lee MOATES, Debtor. In re Guy Weldon Hall, Debtor. Nos. 05-52112-RLJ-7, 05-52121-RLJ-7. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division. January 27, 2006. Max Ralph Tarbox, Law Offices of Max R. Tarbox, Sammy Clay Gregory, Lubbock, TX, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. JONES, B

PD-0705-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/14/2015 8:49:30 PM Accepted 8/17/2015 2:34:18 PM A

PD-0705-15 PD-0705-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/12/2015 3:26:07 PM Accepted 6/12/2015 3:55:18 PM ABEL ACOSTA

293 B.R. 387 (2003) In re Arnulfo CHAPARRO MARTINEZ and Aurora Garcia Martinez, Debtors. No. 02-51203-RLJ-13. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division. May 21, 2003. *388 Sammy Clay Gregory, Stace Williams, Lubbock, TX, for Debtor. Robert B. Wilson, Lubbock, TX, Chapter 13 Trustee. MEMORANDUM

449 B.R. 890 (2011) In re Irineo Olivas SALAZAR and Leonor Martinez Salazar, Debtors. Raymond Anthony Janssen and Susan Gonzales Janssen, Debtors. Michael Wayne Daniel and Susan Lynn Daniel, Debtors. Rudy Joe Barron and Patricia Lynn Barron, Debtors. Osbaldo Ornelas, Debtor. Timothy Terry McClain and Gelaine Lora Mae McClain, Debtors. Johnny Rodriguez and Argelia Murillo Rodriguez, Debtors. Julian Gonzales Pineda and Andrea Ma

308 B.R. 251 (2004) In re James Albert JAY, Debtor. James Albert Jay and Ann C. Jay, Plaintiffs, v. Nesco Acceptance Corporation, Nesco, Inc., Bank One, Oklahoma, N.A., and Linc Acquisition One, L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-11000-RLJ-13. Adversary No. 02-1009. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division. September 30, 2003.

307 B.R. 864 (2004) In re James Albert JAY, Debtor. James Albert Jay and Ann C. Jay, Plaintiffs, v. Nesco Acceptance Corporation, Nesco, Inc., Bank One, Oklahoma, N.A., and Linc Acquisition One, L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-11000-RLJ-13. Adversary No. 02-1009. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division. March 10, 2004.

I! MARVIN, Chief Judge. This appeal is a sequel to Silk v. Silk, 29,107 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/2/97) (on rehearing), 691 So.2d 97, writ denied, 97-1185 (La.6/20/97), 695 So.2d 1361, a worker’s compensation death benefit action concerning to whom the La. R.S. 23:1231 death benefit should be awarded for the work-related death of Barney Silk on September 29, 1994. The benefit was claimed by the decedent’s mother

208 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2000) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jeff Boyd, Charles Green, Sammy Knox, Noah R. Robinson, and Melvin Mays, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 98-2035, 98-2036, 98-2037, 98-2038 & 98-2060 The United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Argued September 27, 1999Decided April 3, 2000

934 F.Supp. 775 (1995) Leonard KIRK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-94-0181. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 22, 1995. *776 *777 *778

Ninth Court of Appeals BE IT REMEMBERED: THAT at the term of the Honorable Ninth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas, begun and holden at Beaumont on the 1st day of January, A.D. 2015, present, Chief Justice STEVE MCKEITHEN and Justices CHARLES KREGER, HOLLIS HORTON and LEANNE JOHNSON. “Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, dated September 22, 2015, it is ordered that these causes be transferr

945 F.Supp. 132 (1996) Rodney MANLEY, et al. v. Kirk FORDICE, et al. Nos. 3:95-cv-23, 3:95-cv-116 and 3:95-cv-283. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. October 16, 1996. *133 Rodney Manley, Parchman, MS, pro se. Rickey Dale Meshell, Parchman, MS, pro se. Casey T. Havard, Parchman, MS, pr

Republic of Kazakhstan v Chapman (2023 NY Slip Op 03211) Republic of Kazakhstan v Chapman 2023 NY Slip Op 03211 Decided on June 13, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

Republic of Kazakhstan v Chapman (2023 NY Slip Op 03211) Republic of Kazakhstan v Chapman 2023 NY Slip Op 03211 Decided on June 13, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

PER CURIAM. This appeal arises from the sale of a Chrysler dealership owned by James and Bonnie Hagans to Ross-Cathey Motors, Incorporated, a corporation owned by David and Darlene Ross and Jim and Doris Cath-ey. To finance the dealership purchase, the Catheys signed a promissory note secured by a mortgage in favor of Chrysler Credit Corporation. Acting as the Rosses’ agent under individual powers of attorney, Jim Cathey signe

276 S.W.2d 843 (1955) Vernon CLAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 27452. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. March 2, 1955. *844 Pat Beene, Snyder, for appellant. Wayland G. Holt, County Atty., Snyder, Leon Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State. MORRISON, Presiding Judge. The offense

254 S.E.2d 665 (1979) Henry H. SINK, Jr., Ancillary Admr. of the Estate of Sammy P. Mercurio v. Donald Elridge SUMRELL. No. 7810SC633. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 15, 1979. *667 Johnson, Gamble & Shearon, by Samuel H. Johnson, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant. Teague, Johnson, Patterson, Dilthey & Clay,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-KA-00150-COA CHRISTOPHER LOWELL JONES A/K/A APPELLANT CHRISTOPHER JONES A/K/A CHRISTOPHER L. JONES v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/10/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

764 F.Supp. 1248 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Henry ANDREWS, Thomas Bates, Roger Bowman, Jeff Boyd, George Carter, Jackie Clay, Edgar Cooksey, Andrew Craig, Jerome Crowder, Lawrence Crowder, Floyd Davis, William Doyle, Harry Evans, Eddie Franklin, Bernard Green, Charles Green, Henry Leon Harris, Earl Hawkins, Louis Hoover, J.L. Houston, Eugene Hunter, Derrick Kees, Isiah Kitchen, Alan Knox, Sammy Knox, Roland Lewis, Felix Mayes,

Boggs, Judge. Following a bench trial, Omar Capellán was convicted of trafficking in marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and giving a false name and date of birth. The trial court denied Capellan’s motion for new trial, and he appeals, seeking review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. For the following reasons, we reverse. “On appeal, we accept the trial court