Cases

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 139 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-14-739 RONALD SAMMONS opinion Delivered M arch 4,2075 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPE

OPINION AND ORDER NORGLE, District Judge: This matter having been tried before the court between June 10 and June 15, 1993, and after hearing the evidence and arguments at trial, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs on all remaining counts of the complaint for reasons

ORDER NORGLE, District Judge. Before the court are the defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs’ motion to remand to state court. For reasons that follow, the motions for summary judgment are denied and the motion to remand is denied. FACTS The plaintiffs, five Illinois municipalities — the cities of Ottawa, Marseilles and Streator and the villages

Quillian, Chief Judge. The defendant, a co-defendant of the defendant in the companion cases of Armstrong v. State, 160 Ga. App. 237, appeals from his conviction for burglary. Held: 1. For the reasons set forth in Division 5 of our opinion in Armstrong v. State, 160 Ga. App. 237, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonab

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHARLES ARMSTRONG, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N15C-07-078 RRC ) JEWISH FEDERATION OF ) DELAWARE, INC. ) Defendant. ) Submitted: January 18, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Christy Sammons, appeals the January 4, 2007, Judgment Entry and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered by the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division Case No. 2006JCV00828, which terminated her parental, privileges and obligations with respect to her minor children. Appellee is the Stark County Department of Job and Family Services. STATEMENT OF

180 A.2d 622 (1962) Franklin E. COKER, Plaintiff, v. Alfred SAMMONS, The Board of Commissioners of the Town of Cheswold and The Town of Cheswold, Defendants. Superior Court of Delaware, Kent County. April 24, 1962. Harrison F. Turner, Dover, for plaintiff. George R. Wright and David P. Buckson, Dover, for defendants. LYNCH, Judge. Plaintiff has brought suit to r

17 Ill.2d 316 (1959) 161 N.E.2d 322 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendant in Error, v. ARTHUR SAMMONS, Plaintiff in Error. No. 35164. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed September 24, 1959. *317 F. VERN LAHART, of Chicago, for plaintiff in error. LATHAM CASTLE, Attorney General, of Spr

MR. JUSTICE SCHAEFER delivered the opinion of the court: Eugene Armstrong, the defendant, and Clifton Hill were indicted in the circuit court of Cook County for the murder and armed robbery of Charles Pollard which occurred in the early morning hours of December 14, 1967. Their cases were severed and on January 15,

On August 30, 1924, W. H. Brunson and D. W. Brunson by general warranty deed conveyed about 15,000 acres of land in Loving and Winkler counties to T. J. Barnes, their nephew; the deed reciting a consideration of $30,000. On the 10th day of October, 1924, Barnes and wife executed a deed of trust on the same land to J. N. Brooker, as trustee for Milano Land Garden Company, a corporation, securing an indebtedness of $7,500. February 26, 1925, Barnes executed a warranty deed to the

Monks, C. J. — Appellant was tried and convicted upon an indictment charging that, while' he was the deputy treasurer of Tipton county, he embezzled the money and funds of said county, with the collection, receiving, safe-keeping, transfer, and disbursement of which he was charged and intrusted as such deputy treasurer. The indictment was returned under section 1942, R. S. 1881 (section 2019, R. S. 1894), which is as follows:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MAHOGANNE SOUL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N21C-11-166 SPL ) THEODORE DROZDOWSKI, ) ) Defendant.

11/20/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 4, 2020 Session JOHN DOE EX REL. JANE DOE v. BRENTWOOD ACADEMY, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2017-435, 2017-472 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge __

Case: 23-10019 Document: 77-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10019 ____________

866 S.W.2d 803 (1993) Tommie SOWELL, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Loniell Sowell, Deceased, Appellant, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 09-92-249 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. December 9, 1993. *805 Brent W. Coon, D'Juana J. Parks, Provost & Umphrey, Beaumont, for

314 Ga. 854 FINAL COPY S22A0511. DRENNON v. THE STATE. WARREN, Justice. Appellant Carlos Drennon appeals from his convictions for malice murder and participation in criminal street gang activity stemming from the shooting death of Randy Griffin.1 On appeal, 1 Griffin was killed on June 10, 2007. On June 27, 2008, Drennon and 11 other defendants were charged in a 60-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury. Drennon was indicted on 15 counts

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERTA KOZAK-BIASOTTO, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N21C-10-234 SPL ) CHERRINGTON SERVICE ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Corporation, MEI INDUSTRIES, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, JAMES ) R. MADDOX, JR, and JAMES R. ) MADDOX, III

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERTA KOZAK-BIASOTTO, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N21C-10-234 SPL ) CHERRINGTON SERVICE ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Corporation, MEI INDUSTRIES, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, JAMES ) R. MADDOX, JR, and JAMES R. ) MADDOX, III

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0030p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRIAN GARRETT; NICHOLAS NUTTER, et al.,*

OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. This appeal turns on whether Professional Benefits Administrator (PBA) is a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) with respect to Plaintiffs’ employee benefit plans. Plaintiffs each established and administered an employee benefit plan (Plan; collectively, Plans) that provided hea