Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sally Tan”
David Patchak v. Sally Jewellpublic domain
WILKINS, Circuit Judge: David Patchak brought this suit under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 705, challenging the authority of the Department of the Interior to take tjtle to a particular tract of land under the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U.S.C. § 465. The land, called the Bradley Property, had been put into trust for the use of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She
Visa Inc. v. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.public domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00339-CV ___________________________ VISA INC., Appellant V. SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 158th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-6924-158 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Wallach and Walker, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Suddert
Tan v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.public domain
OPINION GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge: T1 Plaintiff Tony Tan appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (the Insurance Company)1 Tan *368argues that his amended complaint correcting the name of the Insurance Company related back to his original co
Native Village of Point Hope v. Sally Jewellpublic domain
Opinion by Judge W. FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON. OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”)1 of the Department of the Interior has sought to lease “excellent prospects” for oil and gas development in the Chukchi Sea off the northwest coast of Alaska. The parcels available for lease
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Commonwealth v. Edwards, M., Aplt.public domain
[J-11-2021] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 26 EAP 2020 : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of : Superior Court entered on Februa
People v. Hajek and Vopublic domain
Filed 5/5/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S049626 v. ) ) Santa Clara County STEPHEN EDWARD HAJEK ) Super. Ct. No. 148113 AND LOI TAN VO, )
People v. Trulovepublic domain
People v Trulove (2025 NY Slip Op 01178) People v Trulove 2025 NY Slip Op 01178 Decided on February 27, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Higgitt, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
United States v. Sallispublic domain
507 F.3d 646 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Veronica Maria SALLIS, Appellant. No. 07-1263. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 5, 2007. Filed: November 2, 2007. *647 Deborah Kay Ellis, argued, St. Paul, MN, for appellant. Joseph T. Dixon, Assistant U.S. Attorne
2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Dos Lagos, LLCpublic domain
*315 On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 Petitioners Dos Lagos, LLC and Mellon Valley, LLC defaulted on a loan in which Utah First Federal Credit Union (Utah First) owned a 52
Greaney, J. These cases arise under G. L. c. 151B. In each case, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD or commission) entered decisions finding the respondents liable for employment discrimination and awarded relief including damages for emotional distress. The respondents have sought judicial review of the MCAD’s decision pursuant to G. L. c. 151B, § 6, in accordance with standards set forth in G. L. c. 30A,
Martinez Domena, Edibia v. Retail Value, Inc.public domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Certiorari EDIBIA MARTÍNEZ procedente del DOMENA Tribunal de Primera Recurrido Instancia, Sala Superior de Hatillo v. KLCE20250
349 B.R. 775 (2006) In re Philip Edward KITTERMAN, Debtor. Philip Edward Kitterman, Plaintiff, v. Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P., et all., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-3705, Adversary No. 05-03072. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky. August 30, 2006. *776 Christopher T. Kurtz, Louisville, KY, for Debtor. <
Simons v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRADEN, Judge. I. RELEVANT FACTS1 This case involves a long-term dispute between Plaintiffs and the Internal Revenue *711Service (“IRS” or “Government”) arising from two settlement agreements concerning tax returns filed by Plaintiffs in the 1970s and 1980s.
James H. Sallis v. University of Minnesotapublic domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge. James Sallis appeals from a decision of the district court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of the University of Minnesota. For reversal, Sallis argues that the district court improperly dismissed his Title VII claims and that the district court abused its discretion by limiting the-scope of di
Bale v. Ryan (In Re Ryan)public domain
443 B.R. 395 (2010) In re Angela RYAN, Debtor. Anthony Bale and Sally Bale, Plaintiffs, v. Angela Ryan, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-45948-13 (DML). Adversary No. 09-04391 (DML). United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. August 26, 2010. *400 Christopher Marvin Lee, Jesse Schodrof Garcia, Allmand &
Johnson v. Access Group, Inc. (In Re Johnson)public domain
400 B.R. 167 (2009) In re Heather JOHNSON, Debtor Heather Johnson, Plaintiff v. Access Group, Inc. and Educational Credit Management Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 1:05-bk-00666MDF. Adversary No. 1:05-ap-00162. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 10, 2009. *169 Sara A. Austin, Austin Law Firm LLC
State v. Glosterpublic domain
932 P.2d 68 (1997) 145 Or. App. 555 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Barry Alan GLOSTER, Appellant. 10-94-12199A; CA A89382. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted May 30, 1995. Decided January 22, 1997. Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, P
Sallis v. University of Minnesotapublic domain
322 F.Supp.2d 999 (2004) James H. SALLIS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Defendant. No. Civ.02-1275(RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. June 18, 2004. *1000 *1001 Lateesa T. Ward, Damon L. Ward, and Cassandra Ward Brown, Ward & Ward, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, f
Brisco v. Ercolepublic domain
565 F.3d 80 (2009) Frank BRISCO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert ERCOLE, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellant. Docket No. 05-4339-pr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 11, 2007. Decided: May 13, 2009. *82 Guy Arcidiacono, Assistant District Attorne