Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Salazar v. Driver Provider Phoenix LLC”
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0676 ══════════ Steve Huynh, Individually; Yvonne Huynh, Individually; Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC d/b/a Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm d/b/a Huynh Poultry Farm; T & N Poultry Farm, LLC; Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually; Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm; Timmy Huynh, Individually; and Sanderson Farms, Inc., Petitioners,
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Julian v. Swift Transp. Co.public domain
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiffs are a group of approximately 10,000 truck drivers who worked as "trainee drivers" for Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Plaintiffs were not paid for attending the first day of a mandatory three-day orientation nor were they paid for many hours during a behind-the-wheel training period. Swift seeks summary judgment that Plaintiffs were not en
Roaf v. Rebuck Consultingpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA SHEROLD D. ROAF, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STEPHEN S. REBUCK CONSULTING, LLC, ET AL. Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-23-0233-PR Filed June 25, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Timo
State of Arizona v. Edwardo Serrato IIIpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. EDWARDO SERRATO, III, Appellant. No. CR-24-0264-PR Filed May 14, 2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County The Honorable Billy K. Sipe, Judge Pro Tempor
Jose Perez v. Owl, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 22-12974 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2024 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12974 ____________________ JOSE PEREZ, ALFREDO SANTOS,
Jacob Laurence v. Salt River Projectpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA JACOB LAURENCE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT & POWER DISTRICT, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-21-0292-PR Filed April 28, 2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County T
Boniface v. Vilienapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1411 DAVID BONIFACE; NISSANDÈRE MARTYR; JUDERS YSEMÉ, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. JEAN MOROSE VILIENA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. District Judge]
Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-2364 DOMINIC OLIVEIRA, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. NEW PRIME, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
United States v. Streettpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed December 1, 2017 (Doc. 78)("Motion"); (ii) the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Suppress All Evidence Seized and Any Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Obtained as a Result of the Unlawful Search, filed July 24, 2018 (Doc. 141)("Supp. Motion"); (iii) the Defendant Bentley Streett'
Havens v. Colo. Dep't of Corr.public domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Darrell Havens, a former Colorado state prisoner, appealed from the district court's grant of summary judgment against his claims of discrimination on the basis of his disability. Mr. Havens claimed that certain decisions and policies of the Colorado Department of Corrections ("CDOC") caused him to be excluded from access to the facilities and services available t
McLaurin v. Prestage Foods, Inc.public domain
ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification of a Collective Action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (DE # 21) and on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (DE # 25). Defendant Prestage Foods, Inc. (“Prestage”) has responded to both motions, an
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc. v. Kliebertpublic domain
AMENDED RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Iric; (“PPGC” or “P
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: Section 1500 of Title 28 of the United States Code bars litigation in this court of *691 the same dispute pending in another court. Passed shortly after the Civil War, and long outliving its original purpose, this gatekeeper provision has oft been des
Benavidez v. Sandia National Laboratoriespublic domain
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, *1044filed October 21, 2015 (Doc. 7)(the “Motion”); and (ii) the Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7), Request for Remand, and M
State v. U.S. Dep't of Commercepublic domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION...773 BACKGROUND...775 LEGAL STANDARDS...780 DISCUSSION...780 A. Standing...781 1. Injury-in-Fact...781 2. Traceability...785 3. NGO Plaintiffs' Standing...788 B. The Political Question
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamationpublic domain
601 F.3d 1096 (2010) RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW (Hybognathus amarus); Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax trailii extimus); Defenders of Wildlife; Forest Guardians; National Audubon Society; New Mexico Audubon Council; Sierra Club; and Southwest Environmental Center, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the United States; Robert L. Van Antwerp, Lt. Gen., Chief Engineer, Army Corps of Engineers; United States Army Corp
Brady v. National Football Leaguepublic domain
644 F.3d 661 (2011) Tom BRADY; Drew Brees; Vincent Jackson; Ben Leber; Logan Mankins; Peyton Manning; Von Miller; Brian Robison; Osi Umenyiora; Mike Vrabel; Carl Eller; Priest Holmes; Obafemi Ayanbadejo; Ryan Collins; Antawan Walker, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC; Atlanta Falcons Football Club, LLC; Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership; Bu
Tom Brady v. National Football Leaguepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1898 ___________ Tom Brady; Drew Brees; Vincent * Jackson; Ben Leber; Logan Mankins; * Peyton Manning; Von Miller; Brian * Robison; Osi Umenyiora; Mike Vrabel; * Carl Eller; Priest Holmes; Obafemi * Ayanbadejo; Ryan Collins; Antawan * Walker, indiv