⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Sak v. City of Aurelia, Iowa”

District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011-12-28 · Published · cited 10× · 832 F. Supp. 2d 1026; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149388; 2011 WL 6826146
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. *1030TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................1031 A. Factual Background..................................................
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016-10-14 · Published · cited 2× · 215 F. Supp. 3d 776; 2016 WL 6089842
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CITY OF DES MOINES’S MOTION TO DISMISS STEPHANIE M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The Fort Des Moines Church of Christ, Plaintiff, alleges state and municipal anti-discrimination laws unconstitutionally interfere with its First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiff w
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015-02-10 · Published · cited 19× · 87 F. Supp. 3d 1319; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15832; 2015 WL 541751
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. [35] (Plaintiffs “Motion”), filed by Plaintiff Monica Alboniga (“Plain*1323tiff’), individually and on behalf of her minor child, A.M., and the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF N
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 DNH 055
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE National Education Association, et al. v. Civil No. 25-cv-091-LM Opinion No. 2025 DNH 055 P United States Department of Education, et al. ORDER Ours is a nation “deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendent
Scott v. Bensonpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 863 F. Supp. 2d 836; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60197; 2012 WL 1565101
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket No. 33) DONALD E. O’BRIEN, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction (Docket No. 20), and a hearing was held before Chief Magistrate Judge Paul A. Zoss. Following the hearing on March 19, 2012, Judge Zoss issued a Report and Recommendation (“R &
District Court, D. South Dakota · 2015-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 135 F. Supp. 3d 1015; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73314; 2015 WL 3544847
OPINION AND. ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Perfetti Van Melle USA, Inc. and Perfetti Van Melle Benelux B.V. (collectively, “Perfetti”) arranged through a third party for Defendants Midwest Processing, LLC (“Midwest”) and Dexter Jor-gensen (“Jorgensen”) to recycle candy that Perfetti had manufactured but deemed unsalable. Perfetti moved for a temporar