Cases

626 F.3d 1374 (2010) DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., and Husqvarna Construction Products North America, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., Defendant-Appellant, and Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd., Defendant-Appellant.

ON MOTION ORDER Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Hebei Ji-kai Industrial Group Co., Ltd. et al., Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd. (movants) move jointly to expedite consideration of this appeal or, in the alternative, for a stay of “all administrative proceedings related to the administrative reviews of the anti-dumping orders on diamond sawblades from China and Korea.” The movants stat

650 F.Supp.2d 1331 (2009) DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and St. Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shinhan Diamond: Industrial Co., Ltd., Defendant-Intervenors. Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition, Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, and Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Husqvarna Construction Products

OPINION AND ORDER MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition (“DSMC”) now moves pursuant to United States Court of International Trade (“USCIT”) Rule 11 for the imposition of sanctions on counsel for Defendant-Intervenors Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Husqvarna Construction Products Nort

OPINION AND ORDER MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: Before the court, Defendant-intervenors Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Husqvarna Construction Products North America, Inc., Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd., (“Intervenors”) move for a stay of enforcement of the writ of mandamus issued by the

OPINION AND ORDER MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: Husqvarna Construction Products North America, Inc. has filed a motion to join this matter, familiarity with which is presumed, alongside the defendant-intervenors via intervention. The defendant-intervenors consent, but the motion is opposed by the plaintiff Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition (“DSMC”) and the

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: July 27, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ In re MK Diamond Products, Inc. _____

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, v. SAINT GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and EHWA DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendant-Appella

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LINN. Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK. LINN, Circuit Judge. This is an antidumping case. Saint Gobain Abrasives, Inc. (“Saint Gobain”) and *1350Ehwa Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Ehwa”) (collectively, “Appellants”) challenge two decisions of the Court of International Trade. Bo

OPINION MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: This matter comes before the court as a result of the court’s decision in Diamond Sawblades Mfr’s. Coalition v. United States, Slip Op. 08-18 (Feb. 6, 2008). In that case, the court remanded a decision of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission” or “I

OPINION AND ORDER MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Diamond Sawblades’ Manufacturer’s Coalition (“DSMC”) moves for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. The plaintiff challenges a determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “the Commission”) that the domestic industry

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: 14 September 2006 31 August 2007 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Saint-Gobain Corporation v. 3M Company1

APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and

122 F.Supp.2d 599 (2000) CABOT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. No. 3:96CV505-MCK. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. October 10, 2000. *600 *601 John R. Wester, Lawrence C. Moore, III, Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., C

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: May 20, 2021 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ McGowen Precision Barrels, LLC

This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Oral Hearing: June 26, 2018 Mailed: December 2, 2019 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v.

This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Hearing: August 22, 2013 Mailed: July 9, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Harry Winston, Inc. and

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: August 10, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ The Brooklyn Brewery Corporation v.

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: August 10, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ The Brooklyn Brewery Corporation v.

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: September 13, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ In re Positec Group Limited _____