Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 51332 EAST SIDE HIGHWAY DISTRICT, ) LAKES HIGHWAY DISTRICT, ) POST FALLS HIGHWAY DISTRICT, ) and WORLEY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, ) political subdivisions of the State of ) Idaho, ) ) Petitioners-Respondents, ) ) v.

ALVORD, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with parts I, III and IV of the majority opinion, which conclude that the trial court properly rendered summary judgment on the claims of the plaintiff, Annemarie Morrissey-Manter, that the defendants, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, and Saint Francis Care, Inc., improperly terminated her employment because she had

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

Pillco v 160 Dikeman St., LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04495) Pillco v 160 Dikeman St., LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 04495 Decided on July 30, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Connolly, J.P. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48363 JOE and NANCY CHESTER, Husband and ) Wife; JOE D. AND NANCY L. CHESTER ) FAMILY TRUST, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) Boise, February 2022 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: October 31, 2022

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Bench Trial on Plaintiffs’ First Through Fourth Claims for Relief, and Brief in Support, filed February 17, 2017 (Doc. 253)(“Motion for Bench Trial”). The Court held a hearing on April 26-27, 2017, The primary issues are whether: (i) the Plaintiffs’ breach-of-fiduciary-

451 B.R. 248 (2011) In re SOUTH SIDE HOUSE, LLC, Debtor. No. 09-43576. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. June 27, 2011. *254 Leo Fox, Esq., Stephanie Park, Esq., New York, NY, for South Side House, LLC. Joseph Lubertazzi, Jr., Esq., Peter Knob, Esq., McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, for U.S. Bank National Asso

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This copyright case, involving a film and three screenplays, presents questions about the protection of historical fiction under American intellectual property law. Eve Pomerance owns a copyright in two screenplays about the dramatic and inter7 twined lives of John Ruskin, John Everett Millais, and Euphemia (“Effie”) Gray — two

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49279-2021 GSN CAPITAL, LLC, DBA STICKS + ) STONES and DAVE ZORTMAN, ) ) Boise, June 2023 Term Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) Opinion filed: January 11, 2024 v.

441 B.R. 524 (2010) In re LINCOLNSHIRE CAMPUS, LLC, et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 10-34176. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. November 16, 2010. Vincent P. Slusher, DLA Piper LLP US, Dallas, TX, for Debtor. AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER (I) APPROVING THE DEBTORS' DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND (II) CONF

Loretta A. Preska, Senior United States District Judge *744Table of Contents I. Factual Background...746 a. The NFL Class Members...746 b. September 11, 2001 James Zadroga Victims Compensation Fund Eligible Claimants...747 c. The Purchase Agreements...747 d. Claims A

ACCEPTED 01-15-00423-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/6/2015 7:40:32 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

Putnam v Kibler (2022 NY Slip Op 06574) Putnam v Kibler 2022 NY Slip Op 06574 Decided on November 18, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

ALVORD, J. The defendant, Clifford D. Fritzell, III, 1 appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 2 On a

SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING OMNIBUS MOTIONS TO DISMISS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: -- Defendants in 233 adversary proceedings identified in an appendix to this opinion have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (2) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss complaints filed by Irving H.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

RUVOLO, P. J. *1163I. INTRODUCTION Kathleen McBride (McBride) sued Byron and Kalmia Smith (the Smiths) for violating McBride's rights with respect to a recorded easement over the Smiths' property. After sustaining demurrers to several versions of McBride's complaint, the last without leave to amend, the trial

*773MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9 — Denied JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., United States District Judge I. Introduction On December 28, 2013, Plaintiffs Mah-moud Sayed-Aly, Akram Abdullatif, and Hesham Sayed found themselves at an indoor firearm ra

OPINION Sweet, District Judge Defendant has moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Based on the conclusions set forth below, Defendant’s motion is denied. I. Prior Proceedings Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court on September 21, 2015, alleging a single defamation claim. See Compl.1