Cases

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge. This ruling is with respect to the objection (Doc. # 9945) of Oolenoy Valley Consulting LLC (“Oolenoy”), the trustee of the Safety-Kleen Creditor Trust, to Proofs of Claim Nos. 4854 and 18500 filed by David Carter in the bankruptcy cases of Safety-Kleen Corp. and certain of its affiliated debtors (collectively “the Debtors”). The fol

410 B.R. 164 (2009) In re SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., et al., Debtors. No. 00-02303(PJW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. August 25, 2009. *166 Michael R. Lastowski, Duane Morris, LLP, Wilmington, DE, Whitton E. Norris, III, Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, Boston, MA, for Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. David M. Four

845 A.2d 587 (2004) 179 N.J. 318 Stanley CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and John Doe I, a fictitious person; and XYZ Corporation, a fictitious entity, Defendants. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 1, 2004. Decided April 8, 2004. *589<

532 F.Supp.2d 477 (2007) BOOTH OIL SITE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 98-CV-696(A). United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 27, 2007. *478 *479 *480 R. William Stephens, Stephens & S

380 B.R. 716 (2008) In re SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., et al., Debtors. Clean Harbors, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Arkema, Inc., f/k/a Atofina Chemical, Inc., and also Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Helen Kramer Landfill Superfund Site Group, and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP,[1] Defendants/Counter-claimants. Bankruptcy No. 00-02303(PJW). Adversary No. 05-50474(PJW).

61 F.Supp.2d 1354 (1999) Jill EDWARDS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mark Edwards, deceased; for the benefit of decedent's Estate and his survivor, Jill Edwards, individually, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 97-7180-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. September 7, 1999. *

17 F.Supp.2d 87 (1998) Richard DANISE, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 395CV2406 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 20, 1998. *88 Barbara M. Dratch, Philip F. Spillane, Moots, Pellegrini, Spillane & Mannion, New Milford, CT, for plaintiff. Mark B. Seiger, Donald E. Frechet

RICKHOFF, Justice, concurring. I fully concur in the opinion and judgment. I write separately to emphasize the potential for future problems in this case and to warn of the consequences for the Bar, Bench and our justice system if they are not expeditiously addressed. Mass products liability litigation requires an exceptionally competent trial judge heavily gifted with the four classica

57 F.Supp.2d 947 (1999) TOXIC INJURIES CORPORATION, a California public benefit corporation acting as a private attorney general on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 99-4930 DT (RZX). United States District Court, C.D. Californi

473 S.E.2d 565 (1996) 222 Ga. App. 48 ZAYTZEFF et al. v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION. No. A96A0958. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 28, 1996. *566 Stefano A. Didio, Norcross, for appellants. Bovis, Kyle & Burch, Charles M. Medlin, Atlanta, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge. Th

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Charles Kostek (plaintiff), an employee of Harmon Process Piping (Harmon), fell as he was ascending an unsecured ladder to resume painting a tank at an industrial tank farm owned by defendants in New Kingston, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court should have granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment in full and

DECISION and ORDER FOSCHIO, United States Magistrate Judge. JURISDICTION This matter was referred to the undersigned for all pretrial matters by order of Hon. Richard J. Arcara dated February 19, 1999. It is presently before the court on Plaintiffs motion to compel filed March 30, 2000 (Doc. # 45). BACKGROUND In this action, pursuant to the Comprehen

137 F.Supp.2d 228 (2000) BOOTH OIL SITE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, Joseph Chalhoub, Breslube Industries Limited, George T. Booth, Jr., George T. Booth, III, Booth Oil Company, Inc., Defendants No. 98-CV-0696A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 11, 2000. *229 R. William Stephens

203 Ga. App. 514 (1992) 417 S.E.2d 171 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION et al. v. SMITH. A91A1706. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 4, 1992. Reconsideration Denied March 24, 1992. Holt, Ney, Zatcoff & Wasserman, J. Scott Jacobson, Robert F. Leverett, for appellants. Hardwick & Associates, Clifford H

814 F.Supp. 744 (1993) RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 92 C 714. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. February 12, 1993. As Redacted Based on Sealing Orders March 2, 1993 and March 25, 1993. *745 Robert Marc Chemers, Robert J. Franco, II, Scott O. Reed

Holmes, J., dissenting. Judicial flummery surrounding the so-called employer “intentional tort” continues with this majority opinion — now striking down R.C. 4121.80, legislation enacted by Am.Sub.S.B. No. 307 to specifically define, and to compensate employees for, injuries caused by intentional torts as defined in this new section of law. I feel certain that the General Assembly will be shocked to learn throu

631 N.E.2d 475 (1994) 258 Ill. App.3d 298 197 Ill.Dec. 472 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CANADIAN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., and Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau and Employers Insurance of Wausau, Defendants (Sheldon Whitehouse, Director of Business Regulation for the State of Rhode Island, as Receiver of Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant).

Certified Question of State Law, No. C-2871548. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a state law question. Upon consideration of the motion of Cedarville College for leave to file brief amicus curiae instanter, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective April 8, 1991. Wright, J., dissents.

710 F.Supp. 684 (1989) Mike O. BRADY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., Defendant. No. C2-87-1548. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. April 21, 1989. Frank A. Ray, Columbus, Ohio, and C. Michael Piacentino, Marion, Ohio, for plaintiffs. James E. Davidson, Columbus, Ohio, for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRAHAM, D

OPINION 1 PAUL B. LINDSEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Background Safety-Kleen Corp. (the “Debtor”), along with certain of its subsidiaries, filed its Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on June 9, 2000. Pursuant to the Modified First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization, the Safety-Kleen Creditor Trust (the “Trustee”) was vested with aut