Cases

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In 2010, Dimensional Associates, LLC (“Dimensional”) squeezed out the minority stockholders of The Orchard Enterprises, Inc. (“Orchard” or the “Company”). The merger consideration was $2.05 per share. In 2012, Chief Justice Strine, writing while Chancellor, determined that the fair value of the common stock at the time of the merger was $4.67 per share. See In re Appraisa

ORDER HEMPHILL, District Judge. To implement a favorable verdict at the hands of a jury, plaintiff moved that the court make an award for interest. *34Aetna Insurance Company had issued policies covering the buildings and contents of a residence and a night club owned by plaintiff. After fire occurred damaging the properties covered under the polici

22-76 (L); 15-3135 (L) Fuld v. PLO, et al.; Waldman v. PLO, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 10th day of May, two thousand twenty-four. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RAYMOND

20 Ill. App.2d 244 (1959) 155 N.E.2d 821 Pearl Theresa Murphy, Appellant, v. Northern Trust Company, an Illinois Corporation, Vincent Murphy, Frank J. Murphy, John C. Murphy, Jennie Stafford, Sadie Murphy, Ruth Murphy Bruchmann, Rita Murphy Wilkerson, Helen Murphy Sullivan, Anastasia Murphy Sheridan, Andrew A. Murphy, William L. Murphy, Jane E. Murphy, Mary F.M. Howard, Vincent P. Murphy, William T. Murphy, Janet S. Hartig

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Nelson Norman brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“SSA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), to seek review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”) denying his application for Social Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. Both plaintiff and the defendant

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

67 S.E.2d 47 (1951) 234 N.C. 276 GUY et al. v. BAER et al. No. 238. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 17, 1951. *48 I. R. Williams, Dunn, and Neill McK. Salmon, Lillington, for plaintiff appellants. Smith, Leach & Anderson, James K. Dorsett, Jr., all of Raleigh, and Wilson & Johnson,

The will of Esther Hull Tremain has been admitted to probate by a Surrogate's decree which granted the proponent's motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed the contestants' objection that the alleged will had been revoked by cancellation. Following the unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division of that decree, we have granted leave to appeal and now review the record upon which rests the ruling that the presence of certain marks, lines and writings, concededly made by the testat

BLAIR, Justice. This is a suit for the construction of the will of Harry Marks, deceased. Paragraphs III and IV of the will read: “III. I give, devise and bequeath the sum of $500.00 in cash to be paid as hereinafter directed to the following named associations, corporations and persons: 1. New Orleans Orphan Asylum (Jewish), New Orleans, La. 2. Denver Hospital (Jewish) Denver, Colorad

This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had in the District Court of Fort Bend County on the 23d day of April, of this year, in which appellant was convicted of the offense of murder, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life. Only two questions are raised on the appeal, and these both raise the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. In the first place it is urged that the testimony is not sufficient to show that the body found was that of

By verdict of a jury, and judgment pursuant thereto, the defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin for the term of his natural life. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. In order to determine whether a new trial should have been granted on account of errors occurring at the former trial it is necessary to review the circumstances shown by the evidence. In gen

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th