Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Sabol v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company”
Sabol v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge. Before the court is a consolidation of three actions, 3:ll-CV-0532, 3:11-CV-1110, and 3:12-CV-1621, filed by the plaintiffs, Toni Sabol and Steven Jones, against the defendant, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, for breach of contract and bad faith. The plaintiffs’ claims and subsequent counterclaims by the defendants, stem from the
Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO Insurancepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Dickerson, J. These appeals require us to address whether it is appropriate to certify a class action challenging the validity, under regulations in effect prior to October 6, 2004, of a no-fault insurer’s use of the prevailing geographic rate or the reasonable and customary rate for health care services in calculating first-party benefits due to a claimant or health-care provider.
369 N.E.2d 1093 (1977) Ruth BOCEK, As Administratrix of the Estate of Aubrey Cooper, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE CHICAGO MOTOR CLUB, Motor Club Service Corporation, and the Chicago Motor Club, Defendants-Appellees. No. 3-1275A294. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. December 7, 1977. *1094
Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.public domain
OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: Appellants, Daniel and Sheryl Berg (collectively, the “Bergs”), appeal from the entry of judgment after the trial court granted Appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Inc.’s (“Nationwide”) motion for a directed verdict on the Bergs’ claims under Pennsylvania’s bad faith insurance statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8371. For the reasons set forth herein, we vacate the judgment and remand the c
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 56 In the Matter of Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., Respondent, v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York, Respondent, Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Servicespublic domain
Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti