Cases

OPINION COHN, Senior District Judge. Defendants Daniel Stewart (Mr. Stewart), Donna Stewart (Mrs. Stewart), and Joe Sabino (Sabino) (collectively the defendants) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States by obstructing the functions of the United States Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Stewarts were also convicted of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7

274 F.3d 1053 (6th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT (99-3863),v.JOE SABINO (99-3745); DANIEL K. STEWART (99-3785); DONNA G. STEWART (99-3786), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES. Nos. 99-3745, 99-3785, 99-3786, 99-3863 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: September 11, 2001Decided and Filed Decembe

January 31, 2023 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT CT FREEDOM ALLIANCE, LLC, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ET AL.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT..............................................■......282 A. Alamance County...................................................282 1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County ................282 2. Law Enforcem

587 F.3d 73 (2009) UNITED STATES oF America, Appellee, v. Daniel W. McELROY and Aimee J. King McElroy, Defendants, Appellants. Nos. 08-2088, 08-2471. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 14, 2009. Decided November 20, 2009. *74 James L. Sultan, with whom Charles W. Rankin, Kerry A. Haber

McKEAGUE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ROGERS, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 569-75), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. A grand jury indicted Thomas M. Thompson and six codefendants of various federal offenses related to a drug transaction that turned into an armed robbery. Thompson pleaded guilty to three criminal counts. He r

496 F.3d 256 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose CUEVAS, also known as "Chencho," also known as "Checho"; Edward Vidal, also known as "Bomb," also known as "Bam Bam," also known as "Rubio," also known as "Americano"; Alcides Hernandez, also known as "Ramon Espinosa," also known as "Alcides Sabino," also known as "Edmundo Dewindt"; Ramon Ramirez; Fausto DeJesus; Pablo Sena, Jr., also known as "Elvis"; Rafael Paz; Arelis Vidal, also

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0069p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No. 03-1143-cr United States v. Cuevas 1 2 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 _______________ 6 7 August Term, 2006 8 9 (Argued: May 29, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007) 10 11 Docket No. 03-1143-cr 12

McKAY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. Defendant was charged in a four-count indictment with one count

409 Pa. Superior Ct. 219 (1991) 597 A.2d 1173 John A. ZITELLI, M.D., v. DERMATOLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION a Nonprofit Corporation, and the University of Pittsburgh, a Non-Profit Corporation, Appellant. John A. ZITELLI, M.D. v. DERMATOLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION a Nonprofit Corporation and the University of Pittsburgh a Nonprofit Corporation. Appeal of DERMATOLOGY EDUCATION AND RESEARC

Botsford, J. The named plaintiffs in this putative class action are inmates serving criminal sentences in various Massachusetts prison facilities. For varying lengths of time, each of them has been placed in a “special management unit” (SMU) in nondisciplinary administrative segregation. In January, 2012, the plaintiffs commenced this action against the Commissioner of Correction (c

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

705 F.Supp. 1426 (1988) UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph MILSTEAD, et al., Defendants. No. CIV 84-649 TUC CLH. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 6, 1988. Supplemental Opinion January 27, 1989. *1427 *1428 Michael McCrory, Tucson, Ariz.,

142 Ariz. 183 (1984) 688 P.2d 1075 The TANNER COMPANIES and Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc., dba Phoenix Brick Yard, Arizona corporations, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. The ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT and The Arizona State Land Commissioner, Defendants/Appellants. 2 CA-CIV 4798. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. July 18, 1984.

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by six defendants, including a former United States Congressman, from convictions arising out of the affairs of the Wedtech Corporation, a manufacturing company located in New York City that received contracts from the Defense Department. The defendants are former Congressman Mario Biaggi; his son, Richard Biaggi; the Congressman’s

190 P.3d 737 (2008) Sabino CARBAJAL, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Phelps Dodge, Respondent Employer, Gabb Robbins North America, Respondent Carrier. No. 1 CA-IC 07-0054. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. August 26, 2008. *738 Law Office of Aida Rico By Aida J. Rico,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LINDSAY OLSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-3840 (BAH) LAW OFFICES OF KIRA ANNE WEST, and Judge Beryl A. Howell KIRA ANNE WEST, Defendants. LINDSAY OLSON, Plaintiff, v.

SHEEDY, J. These are declaratory judgment actions in which AFSCME, Connecticut Council 4 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (AFSCME), the named plaintiff in each action, together with the plaintiff Connecticut Retiree Chapter 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, in the first action, are unions that represent current and retired employees of many of this state’s municipalities and political subdivisions, w

ACCEPTED 01-15-00260 FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/17/2015 8:29:47 PM