Cases

AMY, Judge. b The plaintiff filed suit seeking the return or division of funds deposited in an investment account and seeking to probate a copy of a purported will naming her as the sole legatee. The defendant alleged that the will was invalid in form and that the funds in the account were at least partially hers. The trial court rendered judgment, finding that the will was invalid in form, denying the attempted probate, and o

FAY, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of the FDIC’s removal of a case from state court to federal district court. The district court remanded the case to state court on the basis of its finding that the “well-pleaded complaint” rule applied to prohibit the FDIC from removing the case where a federal cause of action did not appear on the face of the complaint. We disagree. Instead, we find that the recent Financial Inst

931 F.2d 1530 59 USLW 2745 Betty Lee LAZUKA, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of Sylvester Lazuka, Sr., Deceased,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for FirstAmerican Bank and Trust, A Florida BankingCorporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-5693. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit.

882 F.Supp. 713 (1995) JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GOFEN & GLOSSBERG, INC., Boulevard Bank National Association and Midwest Securities Trust Company, Defendants. No. 93 C 1539. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 9, 1995. *714 *715

184 F.Supp.2d 899 (2001) THE MINNESOTA SCHOOL BOARD ASSOCIATION INSURANCE TRUST, and Independent School District 94-Cloquet, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Education Minnesota, and Education Minnesota-Cloquet, Defendants. No. CIV. 00-2042(RHKRLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 13, 2001.

On Wednesday, July 29, 1891, the defendants, residing and doing business at Savannah, Ga., for the purpose of paying their promissory note held by the plaintiffs, residing and doing business in the city of New York, which was to fall due two days later, drew and mailed to the plaintiffs a sight draft for $1,263.72 payable to the plaintiffs' order upon one Becker, a banker in New York. The plaintiffs received this draft through the mail on Friday, July thirty-first, at eleven o'clock in the fo

DELEHANT, Senior District Judge. The appellant (sole defendant in the district court and herein so designated) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, against it and in favor of the appellees (plaintiffs in the district court and herein so designated) for

141 A.2d 615 (1958) NEWARK TRUST COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Georgia BRUWER, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. May 23, 1958. William Prickett and William Prickett, Jr., Wilmington, for appellant. Harold Leshem, Wilmington, for appellee. SOUTHERLAND, C. J., and WOLCOTT and BRAMHALL, JJ., sitting.

SAVOIE, Judge. | plaintiff Grace Clark (“Clark”) appeals the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of Defendant Jeffrey Racca (“Rac-ca”), finding that the Edward Jones account at issue in this litigation is the separate property of Racca and dismissing Clark’s claims of co-ownership. ■ For the following reasons, we affirm. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Clark and Racca lived together fr

Opinion CHANEY, Acting P. J. — In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff Sondra Wise Kumaraperu alleges her attorneys negligently advised her to draw a check on an account that she owned but on which she was not a signatory and deposit the funds into another account she owned, which she alleges exposed her to a criminal forgery prosecution. The trial court su

CRAIN, J. lain this suit alleging defects in a residential construction, the plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against a limited liability company that provided plans for the construction, and a designer who is a member of the limited liability company. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. FACTS The plaintiffs, Glenn and Sandra Wilson, filed this pr

GENOVESE, Judge. 11 Brenda Bower sued Marx Menard for the return of one-half of the funds Mr. Menard received when he redeemed six certificates of deposits (CDs) and the funds in a checking account which named them as alternate depositors. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Ms. Bower. Mr. Menard appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Mr.

[Cite as State v. Guzman, 2020-Ohio-539.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-19-11 v. ROBERTO GUZMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. OPINION [AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY - APPELLANT]. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court

Judgment rendered December 18, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,971-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** NATIONAL COLLEGIATE Plaint

764 A.2d 411 (2001) 166 N.J. 49 CITY CHECK CASHING, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY; Chemical Bank; Chemical Bank, as successor in interest to Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as successor in interest to Chemical Bank, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jul-Ame Construction Company, a/k/a Jul-Ame Construction, Inc. a

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Plaintiff Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation (“Assured”)1 alleges that defendants Flagstar Bank, FSB; Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation; and Flags-tar ABS, LLC (collectively, “Flagstar”) breached a series of contracts that provided financial guaranty insurance against certain defaults affecti

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE ALLEGATIONS FROM FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. 35] 'Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States - District Judge Plaintiff Charles Matthew Erhart commenced this whistleblower retaliation action against Defendant BofI Holding,' Inc. alleging violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform

The opinion of the court was delivered by LEFELT, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned). Plaintiff City Check Cashing Service, a New Jersey check cashing business, was asked by a customer to cash a $290,000 check, apparently certified by Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (“Manufacturers”). Because the date on the check had been altered, plaintiff called Chemical Bank (“Chemical”), the successor to the rights an

The opinion of the court was delivered by BILDER, J.A.D. This is an appeal by a mortgagee, plaintiff Montgomery National Bank, from a judgment of the Chancery Division dismissing its complaint and discharging the mortgage on property owned by defendants Lawrence Sullivan, Edward J. Murawski, Kathleen R. Murawski, and Sylvester L. Sullivan. The trial judge discharged

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MICHAEL A. MUNOZ AND SHERRY L. No. 63747 MUNOZ, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Appellants, vs. FILED BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST APR 3 0 2015 COMPANY, INC., A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION, Respondent. Appeal from a post-judgment defi