Cases

Branch, Judge. These cross-appeals require us to determine the enforceability of a consumer arbitration agreement that was executed as part of a nursing home admissions process. Specifically, we must decide whether the unavailability of the selected arbitral forum (in this case, the National Arbitration Forum or “NAF’) renders the agreement impossible to enforce and therefore void. For the reasons explained herein, we answer

MEMORANDUM ** This is a Title VTI retaliation case. Michael Miller appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer. We review a district court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Ray v. Henderson, 217 F.3d 1234, 1239 (9th Cir.2000). Summary judgment is appropriate if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and ad

77 F.3d 663 Suzanne M. HANSON; Peter C. Hanson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.McCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; McCaw Communicationsof Florida, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 523, Docket 95-7473. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Nov. 28, 1995.Decided Feb. 27, 1996. Joel M. Miller,

2005 ND 150 Eugene Miller and JoAnn M. Miller, Plaintiffs and Appellants v. Diamond Resources, Inc., Defendant and Appellee No. 20040274 Supreme Court of North Dakota. Filed August 18, 2005 Suzanne M. Schweigert, Smith Bakke Oppegard Porsborg Wolf, P.O. Box 460, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0460, for plaintiffs and appellants. Dann E. Greenwood, Greenwood & Ramse

72 Cal.Rptr.3d 194 (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 988 William W. MILLER, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. No. G036432. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District. February 1, 2008. *195 Boudreau, Albert & Wohlfeil, Joel R. W

Affirmed and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed August 27, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00606-CR SUZANNE ELIZABETH WEXLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 177th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cou

OPINION DIANE M. HENSON, Justice. In this prosecution for driving while intoxicated (DWI), the State appeals from *644 the trial court’s order reconsidering and granting appellee Suzanne Wolfe’s motion to suppress evidence. See Tex. Penal Cod

*967OPINION BY WECHT, J.: Stephen W. (“Father”) appeals from the December 21, 2011 order dismissing in part and granting in part his exceptions to the August 5, 2011 hearing officer’s recommendation for child support. Suzanne D. (“Mother”) cross-appeals from the same order, which granted in part and dismissed in part her cross-exceptions. After careful

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 19 2019, 10:24 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 326 N.J.Super. 558, 742 A.2d 564 (1998). For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, and VERNIERO — 7. Opposed — None.

50 Cal.App.4th 1665 (1996) RUTH MILLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. G019178. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. November 25, 1996. *1667 COUNSEL Lawrence Silver, Mark E. Fie

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, )

ACCEPTED 03-17-00543-CV 21523412 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

329 F.3d 600 Linda M. EIDE, Anita J. Barber, Jack T. Chandler, John E. Coss, Alice M. Hruska, Veronica R. Mathison, Dale E. Miller, Robert J. Pechmann, David F. Ross, Kathleen J. Sheehan, Sandra K. Skrove, Reed T. Weseloh, Plaintiffs/Appellants,Dorothy E. Woodington, Plaintiff,Larry A. Block, Robert S. Boyum, Lawrence D. Bross, Betty J. Carlson, Plaintiffs/Appellants,Fu-Gin Chen, Plaintiff,William P. Cress, Charles Debevec, Richard

James Miller v. State of Maryland, No. 2097, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Fader, C.J. SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT—PROBATION AND RELATED DISPOSITIONS—REVOCATION Defendant’s failure to comply with terms of probation that required him to make child support payments or, if he could not do so, provide copies of job applications on a weekly basis did not constitute “absconding,” and therefore were technical violations of probation for purposes of § 6-223 of t

295 F.3d 421 Suzanne L. VERZILLI and Larry M. Verzilli,v.FLEXON, INC.; Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Milk Marketing, Inc., d/b/a Farmers Cheesev.Flexon, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff,v.Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Milk Marketing, Inc., d/b/a, Farmers Cheese; B.E.A., Inc., John Wolfe, t/d/b/a, Wolfe Industrial Service; Gilco; Miller Edge, Third-Party Defendants.Su

553 A.2d 201 (1989) In the Matter of Thajuana D. MILLER, Respondent. No. 83-841. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 29, 1988. Decided January 24, 1989. Robert Fabrikant, with whom M. Suzanne Riedman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent. Michael S. Frisch, Asst. Bar Counsel, with whom Thomas E. Flynn, Jr., Bar Counsel,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00454-CR Suzanne Kearns Dewalt, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR2006-132, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00077-CV THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellant v. Suzanne L. SMITH and Claudia Acevedo,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00454-CR Suzanne Kearns Dewalt, Appellant v.