Cases

53 Cal.App.4th 299 (1997) SONDRA S. SUTHERLAND, Individually and as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BARCLAYS AMERICAN/MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B103350. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. March 5, 1997. *303 COUNSEL Sondra S. Sutherland, in pr

ACCEPTED 07-15-00297-cv SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 10/19/2015 10:03:21 PM Vivian Lon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17 - 36 (LLA) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), brings this action against De

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17 - 36 (LLA) v. UNDER SEAL BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit I

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the settlement of a class action. The defendant paid substantial sums for res judicata protection from the claims of persons assertedly injured by the toxic emissions of an industrial plant near Bryan, Texas. The monies were allocated among three subclasses, one of which was to receive medical monitoring. Upon the monitoring program’s completion, substantial sums

KING, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the multi-dis-trict litigation spawned from the disaster on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and the resulting massive oil spill that occurred at the Macondo well site in the Gulf of Mexico. Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its action brought under the citizen-suit provisions of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.

394 N.E.2d 949 (1979) THE INDIANA CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, and Thomas E. Gerardot and Walter J. Burton, Appellants (Respondents below) v. SUTHERLAND LUMBER, Fort Wayne, Appellee (Petitioner below). No. 3-378A52. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. September 19, 1979. Rehearing Denied October 31, 1979. *950

OPINION AND ORDER BLOCK, Judge. This is a breach of contract ease. Plaintiff, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), is the assignee of a claim by Red Samm Construction Company (“Red Samm”) asserted against the United States, acting through its agent the United States Army Corps Engineers (the “Corps”). Red Samm entered into a contract with the Corps to improve a small boat harbor

554 So.2d 927 (1989) Joyce SCHWARTZ and Michael Schwartz v. VOLVO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and Aktiebolaget Volvo. 87-1272. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 28, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1989. James R. Pratt III and R. Ben Hogan III of Hogan, Smith, Alspaugh, Samples & Pratt, Birmingham, for appellants. De Martenson and D. Alan T

990 F.2d 1271 301 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 61 USLW 2591, 9IER Cases 1569 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al.,NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al.,Peter G. CRANE, et al., Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al.,NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al.,v.UNITED STATES of Am

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. Table of Contents I. Legal Background.561 II. ILEC Objections. A. Unbundling of Mass Market Switches 1. Subdelegation of § 251(d)(2) impairment determinations to state commissions . 2. Impairment in provision of mass market switching. 3. The Commission’s definition o

414 F.3d 558 UNITED TEACHER ASSOCIATES INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNION LABOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Union Standard of America Life Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellees.United Teacher Associates Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,v.Union Labor Life Insurance Company, Union Standard of America Life Insurance Co., Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants. No. 04-50531.

674 P.2d 268 (1983) STATE of Alaska, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. ALASKA PULP AMERICA, INC., Alaska Lumber & Pulp Co., Inc., Sitka Housing Development Co., Inc., Harbor Seafood, Inc., Wrangell Domestic International Sales Corporation, and Sitka Domestic International Sales Corporation, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 6583, 6594. Supreme Court of Alaska.

56 F.3d 151 312 U.S.App.D.C. 187 TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L.P., et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States ofAmerica, Respondents,Nynex Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 93-1723, 93-1727, 93-1729, 93-1730, 94-1066, 94-1354,94-1355, 94-1366, 94-1367, 94-1375-94-1378, 94-1380,94-1382, 94-1400, 94-1401, 94-1407, 94-1408,94-1432-94

637 F.2d 1276 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jeffrey OTHERSON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Bruce BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 80-1202, 80-1203. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1980.Decided Nov. 6, 1980.Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1981.

687 F.2d 1098 INDIANAPOLIS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, et al., Petitioners,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,et al., Respondents. No. 81-1916. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 19, 1982.Decided Sept. 3, 1982. Fritz R. Kahn, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard &

734 F.2d 1486 236 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 59 P.U.R.4th 1 FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC., et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,Williams Pipe Line Company, Association of Oil Pipelines,Getty Pipeline, Inc., Marathon Pipe Line Company, PhillipsPipe Line Company, Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-AmericaPipeline Company, Texas Eastern Trans

559 F.2d 31 181 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 1 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1203 UNITED STATES of Americav.Harry R. HALDEMAN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.John D. EHRLICHMAN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.John N. MITCHELL, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Harry R. HALDEMAN and John D. Ehrlichman, Appellants.Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.United States Court of Appe

Action on a policy of accident insurance issued by defendant on the life of plaintiff's husband, Thomas H. Edwards, hereinafter referred to as the insured. Plaintiff, as beneficiary, asked judgment for $7500, plus interest, 10% of said total sum as damages and $2500 as attorneys' fees. The jury returned a verdict for defendant upon which judgment was entered. Plaintiff has appealed. The issuance of the policy sued on and its terms were admitted. Plaintiff charged that "the insured died

740 F.2d 1262 239 U.S.App.D.C. 159 William T. SCHOR, Petitioner,v.COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, ContiCommodityServices, Inc. and Richard L. Sandor, Respondents.MORTGAGE SERVICES OF AMERICA, Petitioner,v.COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, ContiCommodityServices, Inc. and Richard L. Sandor, Respondents. Nos. 83-1703, 83-1704. United