Cases

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2022-Ohio-4344.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. Earle E. Wise, P.J. : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Pat

Matter of R.M. v C.M. (2024 NY Slip Op 01545) Matter of R.M. v C.M. 2024 NY Slip Op 01545 Decided on March 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Barros, J. Published by New York State Law Reportin

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CAPITAL MURDER...................................................... 412 n. PROCEDURAL HISTORY..................................................... 414 III. PROCEDURE IN CAPITAL MURDER.................................... 417 *410IV. APPELLATE STANDARDS OF REVIEW................................ 4

Chief Justice DURRANT, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION {1 Floyd Eugene Maestas was charged with aggravated murder, a violation of see*905tion 76-5-202 of the Utah Code, and aggravated burglary, a violation of section 76-6-208 of the Utah Code.1 After being tried and convicted on both charges, he was s

Opinion by Holt, C.: The petition states as plaintiff’s cause of action, in substance as follows: On October 27,1883, the Dunlap Stone and Lime Company borrowed of the First National Bank of Emporia, Kansas, the sum of $1,500, and gave its note for that amount, and used the money in its business. The bank required sureties, and the company procured David Taylor, the plaintiff in error, also plaintiff below, W. P.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0080p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GLENN WHITING, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

MANSFIELD, Justice. In this case, we must decide whether an entity excluded from a city’s list of preap-proved material suppliers on a public construction project can obtain a declaratory judgment that such a preapproval process violated Iowa’s public bidding statute and constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process. Additionally, we must decide whether the same

628 F.3d 937 (2010) LaBELLA WINNETKA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The VILLAGE OF WINNETKA and Douglas Williams, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-3297. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 26, 2010. Decided December 29, 2010. *939 Dean A. Dickie, Attorney (argued), Miller, Canfield, Paddoc

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Plaintiffs, the Missouri Pet Breeders Association (MPBA) and three Cook County pet shops and their owners, have sued Cook County, the President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners, and the Director of Cook County Animal & Rabies Control, alleging that a Cook County ordinance regulating the sale of dogs, cats, a

442 F.3d 456 Dorothy HARRIS, Legal Guardian of Willie M. Washington; Suzanne K. Balikci, Legal Guardian of Jennie Lillian Schankowski; and Mary Ruffin, Legal Guardian of Issac Ruffin, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals [certified class action], Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Janet OLSZEWSKI, Director of the Michigan Department of Community Health, Defendant-Appellant.L.F., Legal Guardian of J.H., individually a

STARCHER, Chief Justice. In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, we are asked to examine a circuit court order denying a motion to certify a class action for users of an allegedly defective prescription drug. After consideration of the briefs, the arguments of the parties, and all other matters of record, we conclude that the circuit court erred, and reverse and remand the ease for proceedings as a class action.

36 F.Supp.2d 821 (1998) Kimberly D. DAMERON and Lowell R. Gasaway, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA, and First Christian Church, Inc., of Scottsburg, Indiana, Defendants. No. NA97-110-C H/G. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. December 18, 1998. *822 *823

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Twin brothers J. and H. Doe1 took summer jobs with the City of Belleville, Illinois. They quit after two months, fed up with the unrelenting harassment to which they had been subjected by their male co-workers. By their parents, they subsequently filed suit against the city, contending that they were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rig

820 F.2d 916 Harold SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF CHICAGO, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, EdwardA. Quigley, formerly Commissioner, Department of Sewers,City of Chicago, Miles McDarrah, Superintendent of Repairs,Department of Sewers, City of Chicago, and Freddie Jones,formerly District Foreman, 4th District, Department ofSewers, City of Chicago, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-1744.

During the year 1930 eight industrial concerns located in this state and engaged in the business of manufacturing fruit and vegetable boxes or crates decided to consolidate their plants and assets into one new corporation, and they entered into a consolidation agreement to that effect. The plants and all their property and assets were to be conveyed to the new corporation in consideration of *Page 871 Common and of Class A Preferred Stock, except timber a

Liability of city — damages — sidewalks — snow and ice. 1. A city may be held liable in an action for damages where the evidence, of, at least, some of the witnesses, which is believed by the jury, shows that a portion of a sidewalk has remained covered with ice and snow during the whole winter, and such ice and snow has been allowed to thaw and freeze and accumulate during such time, and no effort has been made by the city either to r

349 S.W.2d 255 (1961) CITY OF ROLLA, Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur R. RIDEN, Defendant-Respondent. No. 7946. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. August 25, 1961. Motions for Rehearing or to Transfer Overruled September 27, 1961. *256 Ronald J. Fuller, Rolla, for plaintiff-appellant. Llyn Bra

On October 6, 1938, a grand jury in Tulsa county returned a written accusation against Eddie J. Shields, police commissioner of the city of Tulsa, wherein he was charged in four counts with being guilty of various acts and omissions constituting grounds for removal from office, and praying that he be removed. In due time the defendant Shields filed his answer and the case came on for trial before an assigned judge, without a jury. At the conclusion of the state's evidence the court sus

119 F.3d 563 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 625,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,851J. DOE and H. Doe, by their parents and next friends, Davidand Mary DOE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF BELLEVILLE, ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-3699. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 15, 1995.Reargued Feb. 23, 1996.Decided July 17, 1