Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STEVEN W NEAL”
Mark Steven Meadows v. Sharon Kay Storypublic domain
09/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE1 March 11, 2022 Session MARK STEVEN MEADOWS ET AL. v. SHARON KAY STORY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 14-1481-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor ________________
Mark Steven Meadows v. Sharon Kay Storypublic domain
09/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE1 March 11, 2022 Session MARK STEVEN MEADOWS ET AL. v. SHARON KAY STORY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 14-1481-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor ________________
Ginger Lougene Hutsell Denton v. Steven Lee Dentonpublic domain
07/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2021 GINGER LOUGENE HUTSELL DENTON v. STEVEN LEE DENTON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Jefferson County No. 18-CV-23 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor __
WM Capital Partners, LLC v. Anthony W. Thorntonpublic domain
OPINION W. Neal McBrayer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Andy D. Bennett and Richard H. Dinkins, JJ., joined. A secured creditor filed suit against a trucking company and two guarantors seeking a deficiency judgment after disposition of the collateral securing payment of the d
O'Neal v. Remington Arms Co.public domain
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge. Plaintiff, Carol O’Neal, as personal representative of the estate of Lanny O’Neal, deceased, brought an action against defendants, Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., and E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, alleging strict liability (product defect), strict liability (failure to warn), negligent de
Lambrecht v. O'Nealpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Pending before the Court are two derivative actions arising from the unprecedented losses experienced by Merrill Lynch & *333Co., Inc. (“Merrill”) as a result of its aggressive investment in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and similar mortgage-backed securities in the
O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. Chatkin (In re Chatkin)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS P. AGRESTI, Chief Judge. Before the Court for decision is the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay to Pursue RICO Action (“Motion”), Doc. No. 100, filed by the Movants, O’Neal Steel, Inc. (“O’Neal”) and Leeco Steel, LLC (“Leeco”).1 The Motion has been vigorously opposed by the Debtor, Lance Chatkin (“Chatkin”), and the
Patterson v. O'NEALpublic domain
673 F.Supp.2d 974 (2009) Kendrick PATTERSON, Adam Bergman, Michael Attianese, Andrea Levy, Daryl Yeakle, and Raymond R. Plante, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, Plaintiffs, v. Stephen V. O'NEAL, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated; Thomas Hill, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated; Ellen L. Bastier, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated;
State v. O'Nealpublic domain
¶1 In their consolidated matter, William “Harry” O’Neal, Jesse O’Neal, and Gregory O’Neal appeal convictions of manufacturing methamphetamine. Greg1 also appeals his convictions of manufacturing marijuana, first degree unlawful possession of a firearm, and possession of a machine gun. The trial court imposed firearm enhancements on both of Greg’s manufacturing counts and a firearm enhancement on Harry’s and Jesse’s methampheta
Cambiano v. Nealpublic domain
Lavenski R. Smith, Justice. This is an attorney discipline case. Appellant Mark Cambiano appeals from an order of the Conway County Circuit Court dismissing his counterclaim. In his counterclaim, Cambiano sought injunctive relief against the interim suspension imposed by the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct pursuant to Section 7J of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Profes
OPINION Opinion by Justice LEWIS. AmeriPath, Inc. (“AmeriPath”) and DFW 5.01(a) Corporation (“DFW”) appeal the trial court’s judgment, which finalized a series of summary judgments and separate legal rulings, and which awarded attorney’s fees to appellee Steven Hebert. In four issues, appellants contend the trial court erred by (1) denying their motion t
105 F.3d 670 96 CJ C.A.R. 2065 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
Steven M. Wirth v. James W. Friedlobpublic domain
08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 9, 2017 Session STEVEN M. WIRTH v. JAMES W. FRIEDLOB Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 16C-655 Kelvin D. Jones, III, Judge ___________________________________
People v. Nealpublic domain
201 Mich. App. 650 (1993) 506 N.W.2d 618 PEOPLE v. NEAL Docket No. 147741. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted July 7, 1993, at Lansing. Decided October 4, 1993, at 9:20 A.M. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Carl J. Marlinga, Prosecuting Attorney, Robert J. Berlin
Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Nealpublic domain
W. SHARP, J. Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. (Holmes) seeks certiorari review of the trial court’s discovery order, which grants the plaintiffs/respondents’, Susan Neal and Steven M. Neal (“the Neals”), motion to compel Holmes to answer supplemental interrogatories numbered 119 through 214. In another proceeding, Holmes also seeks review of a discovery order compelling Holmes to answer supplemental interrogatories 361, 36
Steven McCoy v. United States of Americapublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge. Steven McCoy appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the government on his claim pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2672. We affirm. I McCoy was convicted of drug conspiracy charges and incarcerated in various federal penal facilities from 1993 to April 16, 1999. Sometime in 1994, he was bitten on the right leg by a spider and he sought t
Steven Neal Bogue v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-06-00086-CR
PER CURIAM. Steven L. Scherer, Michael Joseph Neal, and Total Solutions, Inc. appeal the summary judgment denying their claim for attorney’s fees against the Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association. We will affirm the judgment. Appellants sought recovery of attorney’s fees incurred in defending themselves from a suit against which they
Neal v. Director, D.C. Department of Correctionspublic domain
400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab
Morris Neal Davis v. Steven Dotson, Wardenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON MORRIS NEAL DAVIS v. STEVEN DOTSON, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 07-02-0278 Joseph Walker, Judge No. W2008-00010-CCA-R3-HC - Filed July 29, 2008 The petitioner, Morris Neal Davis, appeals the Hardeman County Circuit Court’s summary dismissal of his petition for the writ of habeas co