Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STEVEN R WILLIAMS”
RODERICK R. WILLIAMS v. HONORABLE STEVEN PORCHpublic domain
KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice | petitioner Roderick R. Williams filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Honorable Steven Porch, circuit judge, to rule on a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2011); a motion for a copy of the trial transcript; a motion fo
Williams v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.public domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Williams v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Williams v. Comm'r of Corr.public domain
The petitioner Steven Lamont Williams' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 178 Conn. App. 902, 172 A.3d 883 (2017), is denied.ROBINSON, J., did not partici
Williams v. Comm'r of Corr.public domain
Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed.
Trena R. Jefferson v. Patricia A. Williams-Mapppublic domain
06/03/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 19, 2022 Session TRENA R. JEFFERSON ET AL. v. PATRICIA A. WILLIAMS-MAPP Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-20-0982 Gadson W. Perry, Chancellor
Steven R.F. v. Harrison Sch. Dist. No. 2public domain
R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on review of the Colorado Office of Administrative Courts' ("COAC") findings and decisions in favor of defendant Harrison School District No. 2 ("the District") on the grounds that the District had provided plaintiff Steven R.F. with a free appropriate public education. Steven, by and through his mother Carrie Fernandez, seeks reversal of the COAC's deci
04/18/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 19, 2019 Session STEVEN WILLIAMS v. GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC16CV2392 Ross H. Hicks, Judge ___________________________________
State ex rel. Williams v. Statepublic domain
In re Williams, Steven R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, • 20th *12Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 13495; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 CW 0107. Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
State v. Williamspublic domain
In re Williams, Steven R.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 444-752; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-KA-1327. Denied.
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, Defendant- Appellant Harrison School District No. 2 asks us to reverse the district court's ruling that it violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) by failing to provide Plaintiff-Appellee Steven R.F. with a free appropriate public education. Because we conclude that the case is moot, we dismiss this appeal, vacate the distr
Steven Robert Williams v. Margaret Simpson Williamspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 22, 2002 Session STEVEN ROBERT WILLIAMS v. MARGARET SIMPSON WILLIAMS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 160216 R.D. D’Army Bailey, Judge No. W2001-00101-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 20, 2002 This appeal arises from a divorce action. We are asked to review the trial cou
Russell G. Gross v. Steven M. Parepublic domain
Justice Goldberg, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on April 11, 2018, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiff, Russell G. Gross (plaintiff or Gross), appeals from a final judgment granting the motion of the defendants, Steven M. Pare, William Trinque, and
Steven R. Perles PC v. Kagy, Anne Mariepublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge. Like a contentious corporate merger or a sizable family inheritance, a large contingency fee in a successful lawsuit sometimes leads to nasty controversy over who gets what. This case is a fine example. From 1994 to 1999, recent law school gradu
Commonwealth v. Williamspublic domain
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the November 17, 2016, order granting the pre-trial suppression motion filed by Appellee, Dion Jerry Williams. 1 Following our careful review of
Russell Prevatte v. Steven Merlakpublic domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Russell Prevatte was convicted of detonating a pipe bomb in an alley that destroyed property and resulted in the death of an innocent bystander, Emily Antkow-icz, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). If the pipe bomb had not caused a death, at the time of his conviction, the maximum sentence Prevatte could have received for the violation of § 844(i) would
Williams v. Fedex Corporate Servicespublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Steven Williams alleges that his former employer, FedEx Corporate Services, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by discriminating against him based on his actual and perceived disabilities, and by requiring his enrollment in the company’s substance abuse and drug test *893
United States v. Steven McDowellpublic domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Jeremy Cooper and Steven McDowell were convicted on charges related to a heroin distribution conspiracy. They appeal, arguing first that there was insufficient evidence to support their conspiracy conviction. But a jury could reasonably conclude that they were co-conspirators given the evidence that McDowell and Cooper coordinated to obtain and sell drug
In re Steven D.public domain
OPINION Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on May 6, 2014, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. In these consolidated appeals, the respondents, Kathleen D. and Ronald D.
United States v. Steven Latinpublic domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Sharon Anzaldi, Phillip DeSalvo, and Steven Latin concocted an $8 million fraudulent tax scheme based on a sovereign citizen-type theory that the U.S. government holds hidden bank accounts for its citizens that can be accessed through various legal maneuvers. By filing false tax returns, Anzaldi, DeSalvo, and Latin requested more than $8 million for themse