Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STEVEN A. MOORE”
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00187-CR ___________________________ STEVEN ADAM MOORE A/K/A STEVEN MOORE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 355th District Court Hood County, Texas Trial Court No. CR14357 Be
Opinion issued February 26, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00494-CV ——————————— ROSE TURNER AND STEPHANIE MOORE, Appellants V. LINDA WILLIAMS, ANDREW ROSS, AND STEVEN A. SINKIN, Appellee
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT APPELLATE RECORD Appellate case name: Rose Turner and Stephanie Moore v. Linda Williams, Andrew Ross, and Steven A. Sinkin Appellate case number: 01-17-00494-CV Trial court case number: 2016-17907 Trial court: 247th District Court On or about Oct
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-17-00494-CV Style: Rose Turner and Stephanie Moore v Linda Williams, Andrew Ross, and Steven A. Sinkin Date motion filed*: February 15, 2018 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to fil
Order issued July 26, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-17-00494-CV ROSE TURNER AND STEPHANIE MOORE, Appellant V. LINDA WILLIAMS, ANDREW ROSS, AND STEVEN A. SINKIN, Appellees On Appeal from 247th District Court
Moore v. Moorepublic domain
Atcheson, J.: *612 SUMMARY OF CASE AND DISPOSITION The central issue in this case turns on whether Steven Moore manipulated John and Joyce Moore, his parents, to part with land they owned, thereby gutting a trust they had set up as an estate plan to benefit all four of
A.F. Moore & Assocs., Inc. v. Pappaspublic domain
Charles P. Kocoras, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants Maria Pappas ("Collector"), Joseph Berrios ("Assessor"), and the County of Cook's ("County") (collectively, "Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiffs A.F. Moore & Associates, Inc. ("A.F. Moore"), J. Emil Anderson & Son, Inc. ("Anderson"), Prime Group Realty Trust ("Prime Group"), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons ("AAOS"), Erling Eide ("E
Com. v. Moore, B.public domain
J-A23043-23 2023 PA Super 251 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : BROCK E. MOORE :
Deborah Christine Moore v. Larry Gene Moorepublic domain
05/15/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 15, 2020 DEBORAH CHRISTINE MOORE v. LARRY GENE MOORE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 135230 Gregory S. McMillan, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Moorepublic domain
HORTON, Justice. Steven Michael Moore appeals the district court's decision denying his motion to suppress his identification by an eyewitness. The district court found that law enforcement had engaged in a suggestive identification procedure but concluded that the identification was nonetheless reliable under the five-factor reliability test first articulated by the United States Supre
State v. Moorepublic domain
AOYAGI, J. *307Defendant was convicted of three counts of second-degree rape. On appeal, he assigns error to the sentencing court's imposition of three consecutive 75-month prison sentences and $1,600 in attorney fees. In his first and second assignments of error, defendant asserts that the sentencing court committed
Moore v. JOHN A. LUCHSINGER, PCpublic domain
862 A.2d 631 (2004) Thomas P. MOORE, Appellant, v. JOHN A. LUCHSINGER, P.C., and John A. Luchsinger, Esquire, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 28, 2004. Filed November 17, 2004. *632 Geoffrey S. Worthington, Stroudsburg, for appellant. Jeffrey B. McCarron, Philadelphia, for appellee. (submitted)</
Gregory J. Moore v. Steven C. Bryantpublic domain
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. This petition for habeas corpus brought by Gregory Moore under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before this court for the second time. In our prior opinion, we held that Moore did not proeedurally default his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in state court, and we remanded the case for consideration of the merits of his claim. Moore v.
People v. Moorepublic domain
BENKE, Acting P. J. *890A jury found Jimmy Moore guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of *891Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a) and two counts of vandalism in violation of Penal Code 1
Moore v. Dunnepublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Nicole Dunne and John Dunne appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), entered January 8, 2015, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend the time to serve a summons and complaint upon those defendants, which had been denied in an order of the
Wall v. Moorepublic domain
Defendant Steven A. Moore appeals the Windham Family Court’s order dividing the marital property and debts in a final divorce decree. He further appeals the trial court’s decision not to award him spousal maintenance, and claims that gender bias motivated the court’s decision, in violation of the Equal Protection clauses of the United States and Vermont Constitutions. We affirm. Plaintiff and defendant were married for the last four years
Carrington v. Moorepublic domain
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.), entered October 3, 2013 in Ulster County, which, among other things, denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment. In September 2010, plaintiff, an inmate, commenced this action pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 against defendants, various employees of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, claiming a deprivation of his rights
Carrington v. Moorepublic domain
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.), entered October 3, 2013 in Ulster County, which, among other things, denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment. In September 2010, plaintiff, an inmate, commenced this action pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 against defendants, various employees of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, claiming a deprivation of his rights
United States v. Steven Maxwellpublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. A January 2012 superseding indictment charged twelve defendants with conspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 & 1349. Various defendants were charged in thirty-seven other counts with specific bank fraud and aggravated identity theft offenses. See 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. Steven Maxwell was charged in .Count 39 wit
United States v. Moorepublic domain
John M. Walker, Jr., Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Calvin Stephon Moore appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to three counts of federal bank robbery in the United States District Court for Northern District of New York (Thomas J. McAvoy, Judge ). Moore received three concurrent 135-month terms of imprisonment. On appeal, Moore argues that the district court erred in determining that he was subj