Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STEPHENS v. GOUGH”
Gough v. Transamerica Life Insurancepublic domain
781 F.Supp.2d 498 (2011) Michael L. GOUGH and Carol Gough, Plaintiffs v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Life Investors Insurance Company of America, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09CV-00120-JHM. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Owensboro Division. March 17, 2011. *500 Stephen M. Arnett, Hulette & Arnett, LL
Juelfs v. Goughpublic domain
41 P.3d 593 (2002) Julie A. (Gough) JUELFS, Appellant, v. Stephen J. GOUGH, Appellee. No. S-9931. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 15, 2002. Rehearing Denied March 13, 2002. *594 Julie A. Juelfs, pro se, North Pole. Cory R. Borgeson, Borgeson & Burns, Fairbanks, for Appellee. Before: FABE, Chie
In re Goughpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Stephen J. Gough appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and *928Interferences (“Board”) affirming the rejection of all claims of U.S. Patent Application No. 07/683,484 (“'484 application”) as either obvious or anticipated under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e) and 103(a). Because the Board correctly determined tha
Gough v. Perkowskipublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Edward Perkowski and other officers of Carpenters Local 1243 named as defendants in this lawsuit appeal directly from the district court’s order granting a motion to disqualify defendants’ counsel. Several members of Carpenters Local 1243 brought suit on behalf of the Local against the union officers for breach of fiduciary duty. 29 U.S.C. § 501(a) (1976). The plaintiffs moved to disqualify defend
Gough v. Perkowskipublic domain
694 F.2d 1140 95 Lab.Cas. P 13,881 Stephen GOUGH, James Kinney, Elder Lebert and Donald Porter,and Concerned Carpenters of Local 1243 on behalf of Local1243, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners ofAmerica, Plaintiffs-Appelleesv.Edward D. PERKOWSKI, Art Flannagan, Lawrence Jefferson,Ralph Kraus, Gary Slay, Allen Sparks, DonaldSwarner, Charles Vogel and Joe Volker,Defendants-Appell
Gough v. Statepublic domain
285 N.J. Super. 516 (1995) 667 A.2d 1057 STEPHEN JOHN GOUGH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 20, 1995. Decided November 17, 1995. *517 Before Judges KING, LANDAU and KLEINER. Stephen John Gough,<
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter was initiated by the above-captioned Debtors/Plaintiffs, A. Barletta & Sons, Inc. and A. Barletta & Sons, a partnership, hereinafter (“Plaintiffs”), against Trib-ble & Stephens Co., et al., by adversary complaint filed September 16, 1994. The instant matter deals with a Motion for Summary Judgment filed on b
David Clifton Stephens v. United Statespublic domain
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge: Appellant was the County Office Manager in Brazoria County, Texas, of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASC), established under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended. He was tried before a jury and convicted on four counts, one of accepting a bribe in violation of 18 U.S
Thurston v. Goughpublic domain
The Ordinary. Edward Gough, died at Jersey City, March 29th, 1885, testate. On April 8th, 1885, Isaac Gough, one of his sons, filed in the office of the surrogate of Hudson county a caveat 'against admitting to probate any paper purporting to be the will of the decedent, until after examination and decree thereon by the orphans court of that county. On April 23d, 1885, fifteen days afterwards (no day had been fixed by the orp
Stephens v. Van Arsdalepublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Prager, J.: This is an original proceeding in mandamus against Dorothy I. Van Arsdale in her official capacity as Clerk of the District Court of Sedgwick County, Kansas, which arose from her denial to plaintiffs of access to certain court files of criminal proceedings. Access to the court files was denied on the ground that K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 22-4712 and K.S.A. 1979 Sup
Nelson v. Goughpublic domain
ME. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY delivered the opinion of the court. This suit was instituted to have determined the relative rights of the parties to the use of the waters of Nelson Creek— sometimes called Brock Creek — in Missoula county. The cause was tried first in 1915 and retried in 1918, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which judgment and an order denying a new trial defendants appealed. <
Stephens v. Gilberton Coal Co.public domain
Opinion by Walker J. The plaintiffs in this case obtained a judgment against the defendant before a justice of the peace, on 19 April, 1871, for $41.88.. The defendant appealed on 6th May, 1872, and the affidavit of de-fence filed under the 49th rule of court sets forth. “That to the defendant above named there was assigned part of a judgment to September-Term, 1872, No. -, against the pla
Fellows v. Giese v. Saylorpublic domain
JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants 1 appeal the order of the Water Court denying their *300 motion to alter or amend its final order on certifi
Schaff v. Statepublic domain
697 S.E.2d 305 (2010) SCHAFF v. The STATE. No. A10A0290. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 28, 2010. *306 Bondurant, Mixon & Elmore, Michael B. Terry, Atlanta, Kevin R. Gough, Brunswick, for appellant. Stephen D. Kelley, Dist. Atty., Jacquelyn L. Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. Garland, Samuel & Lo
Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Forquest Ventures, Inc., Ken Hagman, and Allison Hagman 1 (collectively Forquest) appeal the Order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting Appellees’
Estate of Welch v. Holcim, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The estate of petitioner Ross Welch (Welch) appeals the Eighteenth Judicial District Court’s order affirming the decision of the Montana Human Rights Commission (Commission), which upheld the Montana Department of Labor and Industry’s dismissal of Welch’s discri
Thompson v. Statepublic domain
CARLEY, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully submit that the majority erroneously bases its decision entirely on a misreading of the State’s “concession” regarding Thompson’s prior habitual violator convictions and on a misunderstanding of the trial court’s statement with respect to its use of those convictions. The prosecutor did not concede that the previous convictions could not be considere
Thompson v. Statepublic domain
569 S.E.2d 884 (2002) 256 Ga. App. 776 THOMPSON v. The STATE. No. A02A0525. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 11, 2002. Reconsideration Denied July 29, 2002. *887 Kevin R. Gough, Brunswick, for appellant. Stephen D. Kelley, Dist. Atty., Charles K. Higgins, Asst. Dist. Atty., for app
Thompson v. Statepublic domain
Johnson, Presiding Judge. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Division 9 of this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court, Thompson v. State, 276 Ga. 701 (583 SE2d 14) (2003), our decision in Thompson v. State, 256 Ga. App. 776, 782-784 (9) (569 SE2d 884) (2002), is hereby vacated as to Division 9. The case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with the opinion of the Supre
Roth v. United Statespublic domain
326 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2003) Stephen and Jean ROTH, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 02-44-M-LBE. United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. December 12, 2003. *1164 Ward A. Shanahan, Gough Shanahan Johnson & Waterman, Helena, Mt, S. Amanda Koehler, Mountain States Legal