Cases

99 F.Supp.2d 105 (2000) Gregory A. HARRIMAN and Kathryn Harriman, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. No. 99-41-B-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. May 5, 2000. Carl D. McCue, Law Offices of Carl McCue, Hampden, ME, David J. Van Dyke, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiffs. Frederick Emery, Of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-cv-2458 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-1775 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants.

575 F.3d 999 (2009) People of the State of CALIFORNIA ex rel. Bill LOCKYER; State of New Mexico, ex rel. Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico; State of Oregon, by and through Theodore Kulongoski, Governor; State of Wyoming; The Wilderness Society; California Wilderness Coalition; Forests Forever Foundation; Northcoast Environmental Center; Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund; Sitka Conservation Society; Siskiyou Regional Edu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-02570 (TNM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and FARM SERVICE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Humane Society of the Unit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE PRZYBOCKI; KETAN No. 24-7174 VAKIL; GOURMEND FOODS, D.C. No. LLC, 2:23-cv-00455- ART-DJA Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION UNITED STATES DEPA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ORGANIC TRADE ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1875 (PLF)

MEMORANDUM OPINION September 20, 2017 [Dkt. ##94, 95, 96, 97] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge In 2001, the United' States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) promulgated the Roadless Area Conservation Rule—commonly referred to as the “Roadless Rule”—which limits road construction and timber harvesting in national forests. It is this Rule—and its application to the Ton-gass N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RANCHERS-CATTLEMEN ACTION LEGAL FUND, UNITED STOCKGROWERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2552 (RDM) v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal F

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No.: 16-148 (RC) v. : : Re Document Nos.: 28,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2022 MSPB 28 Docket No. PH-1221-15-0535-W-1 Paul Bishop, Appellant, v. Department of Agriculture, Agency.

MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. This is an appeal from an order by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and Rule 8001(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. In an April 1, 2014 memorandum opinion and order, the bankruptcy court found that the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) viol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY PRIDE, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-2292 (LLA) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Larry Pride, Marvin Roddy, Victor Lee, Gary Harris, and Chris Anderson are Black

OPINION and ORDER Donald W. Molloy, District Judge United States District Court The plaintiffs in this consolidated action seek review under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, of federal agency actions and the associated planning documents relating to the approval of a proposed mining operation in the Cabinet Mountains Wilderness area in the Kootenai National Forest in northwes

735 F.Supp. 20 (1990) Eileen DUNN, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 88-0165-B. United States District Court, D. Maine. April 11, 1990. *21 Judson Esty-Kendall, Pine Tree Legal Assistance, Inc., Bangor, Me., for plaintiff. Marina E. Thibeau, Asst. Atty. Gen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KAREN E. SCHREIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Argus Leader Media, brings this Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit against defendant, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Argus seeks data on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp Program. The USDA opposes releasing the data based on FOIA Exemption 4, argui

MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff appeals from the decision of the district court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This appeal presents the issue of whether Pell Grant funds spent by the plaintiff on books and supplies while such funds were temporarily restricted by her school to spending at the school bookstore are excludable from income computations for the purpose of determining entitlement to food st

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge GREGORY joined. *417 OPINION FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Over thirty-five years ago, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The State of Alaska appeals the District Court for the District of Alaska’s decision setting aside the Departure of Agriculture’s exemption of the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule. The majority holds that Alaska has standing to appeal based on a statutory entitlement— *972an option to collect a share of t

*981McKEOWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. After extensive public comment, in 2001 the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), acting through the United States Forest Service, adopted the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation (“Roadless Rule” or “Rule”), 66 Fed.Reg. 3244, 3253 (Jan. 12,