Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “STANFORD MART LP”
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ISKANDIA ENERGY OPERATING, INC., § No. 08-22-00103-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 143rd Judicial District Court
Republic Petroleum LLC and Republic Petroleum Partners, LP v. Dynamic Offshore Resources NS LLC and W&T Offshore Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00370-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/13/2015 4:04:08 PM
Glaberson v. Comcast Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the Motion of Comcast Corporation, et al. (“Com-cast”) to strike the Plaintiffs’ Motion to re-certify the Philadelphia class. (Doc. No. 564.) For the reasons that follow, we deny Comcast’s Motion and permit it to file a substantive response to the Plaintiffs’ Motion. I. BACKGROUND On Marc
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00237-CV ___________________________ IMPERIAL CHARTERS, LLC, Appellant V. REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Tarrant County, Texas
Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 28, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00758-CV YVETTE BRANCH, Appellant V. LAURA MCCASKILL, COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE COMPANY, AND NRT TEXAS, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 192nd District Court
Kendyl K. Smith v. Miranda Fordpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00255-COA KENDYL K. SMITH APPELLANT v. MIRANDA FORD APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/30/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLA
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
In Re Zamanipublic domain
390 B.R. 680 (2008) In re Michael A. ZAMANI, Debtor. No. 06-52509 MM. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California. April 7, 2008. *681 Patric J. Kelly, Adleson, Hess and Kelly, Campbell, CA, Charles B. Greene, Law Offices of Charles B. Greene, San Jose, CA, for Debtor. Stanford H. Atwood, Jr., D. Kent Westerberg, Atwood, Haima
H. Heller & Co. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.public domain
209 S.W.3d 844 (2006) H. HELLER & CO., INC. and Gulf Performance Polymers, Inc., Appellants, v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP., Appellee. No. 14-06-00481-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 7, 2006. *847 Rachel Michelle Stanford, Gregory M. Cokinos, Robert A. Plessala, Houston, for appellants.
Friedman v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.public domain
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge I, INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on March 25, 2016, seeks judgment as to Count I of the Fifth Amended Complaint for. violations of. the Colorado Consumer Protection Act [“CCPA”] on behalf of Plaintiff
Machado v. System4 LLCpublic domain
Cordy, J. This case was filed in 2010 by a franchisee janitorial worker, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated indi *205 viduals, against System4 LLC (System4), a “master franchisor,” and NECCS, Inc., doing business as SystemA of Boston, LLC (NE
OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Jeffrey and Summer Olmstead sued Mark and Caroline Goldman for breach of a contract to purchase residential real estate. The Goldmans filed a third-party petition against Sandra Hewett, the real estate agent who represented them in the transaction, asserting claims for negligence, breach of fiduci
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge Pending before the court is Defendant Associates First Capital Corporation’s (“Associates”) Motion for Summary Judgment (#36). Associates seeks summary judgment as to all claims asserted by Plaintiff The Note Investment Group, Inc. (“TNIG”). Having considered the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the
State of Delaware v. BP America Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-097 MMJ CCLD ) BP AMERICA INC., BP P.L.C., ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS,
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge. Before the court is Baylor’s Motion to Reconsider, filed March 23, 2012. After careful consideration of the motion, briefing by the parties, record, and applicable law, the court grants Baylor’s Motion to Reconsider, vacates its March 15, 2012 memorandum opinion and order, and issues this amended memorandum opinion and order in i
Scurtu v. International Student Exchangepublic domain
523 F.Supp.2d 1313 (2007) Lina SCURTU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL STUDENT EXCHANGE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0410-WS-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. October 19, 2007. *1314 *1315 Robert A. Ratliff, Robert A. Ratliff, P.C., Mobile, AL,
Mid-South Maintenance Inc. v. Paychex Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 9, 2015 Session MID-SOUTH MAINTENANCE INC., ET AL. v. PAYCHEX INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH140676 Jim Kyle, Chancellor ________________________________ No. W2014-02329-COA-R3-CV – Filed August 14, 2015 _____________
Lifespan Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. McCONNELL, JR., District Judge. Lifespan filed this lawsuit to obtain a declaratory judgment and monetary damages from the two defendant insurance companies, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh,-Pennsylvania and RLI Insurance Company. Lifespan seeks coverage under its policies with.National Union and RLI in connection with a $29,605,282.93 amended judg
Opinion issued July 15, 2010. In The Court of Appeals For The
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REED O’CONNOR, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Blue Cross of California, Anthem Health Plans, Inc., Community Insurance Company, Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc., Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc., and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.’s (collectively