Cases

182 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 1999) BIG BEAR LODGING ASSOCIATION; SLEEPY FOREST RESORTS, a California corporation; ROBERT POOL, dba Cathy's Country Cottages; MARK TWAIN HANNAH, dba Front Desk Vacation Rentals, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.SNOW SUMMIT, INC., a California corporation; RICHARD KUN, an individual; FRITZ UPPENLATZ, dba Forest Shores Estates (Inn); JOYCE REED, dba Grey Squirrel Resort; GERRY TAYLOR, dba Bear Mountain Trading Co.; BRUCE VOIG

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are lodge operators and lodging referral services in a ski resort area in Southern California. They allege antitrust violations by other lodge operators and two ski resorts in the area, allegedly injuring Plaintiffs. The district court dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. We affirm in part and reverse in part. I Plaintiffs bas

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has additionally filed a motion for a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DN 20). These matters are fully briefed and are ripe for adjudication.

191 P.3d 1189 (2008) ADAVEN MANAGEMENT, INC., A Nevada Corporation, Appellant, v. MOUNTAIN FALLS ACQUISITION CORPORATION, A Nevada Corporation; and Commercial Federal Corporation, A Foreign Corporation d/b/a Commercial Federal Bank, Respondents. No. 48429. Supreme Court of Nevada. September 11, 2008. *1190 Harrison, Kemp, Jones &

235 Wis.2d 409 (2000) 2000 WI 56 611 N.W.2d 693 WILLOW CREEK RANCH, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,[â ] v. TOWN OF SHELBY and County of LaCrosse, Defendants-Respondents. WILLOW CREEK RANCH, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,[â ] v. TOWN OF SHELBY and County of LaCrosse, and Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.

Justice MARQUEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court. In this joint opinion, we address two direct appeals from the same water court proceedings (Case No. 8CW80). First, we review the water court's denial of Meridian Service Metropolitan District's ("Meridian") motion to intervene in a declaratory judgment action between Cherokee Metropolitan District ("Cherokee") and Upper Black Squirrel Creek Ground Water Man

719 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2009) AURORA WORLD, INC., Plaintiff, v. TY INC., Defendant. Case No. CV 09-08463 MMM (Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 15, 2009. *1121 Raymond B. Kim, Vincent Henry Chieffo, Wendy M. Mantell, Courtney J. Chai, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Robert L. Meylan, Shaunt T. Arevian, Murphy Rosen

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Land O’ Lakes has sued two of its insurers — defendants Employers Insurance Company of Wausau (“Wausau”)1 and The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) — seeking payment of defense costs and indemnity in connection with an environmental-cleanup action brought

Tucher, J.* *1180The Ventura River watershed is home to Southern California steelhead trout, a species listed as endangered since 1997. Defendant City of San Buenaventura (City) has been diverting water from the Ventura River

Justice COATS delivered the Opinion of the Court. 1 1 Harrison appealed directly to this court from adverse rulings of the Water Court for Water Division No. 2 in two separate cases. With regard to Harrison's Application for a Change of Water Right, the water court granted the Engineers' motion to dismiss at the close of Harrison's case, finding that he was required, but failed, to establish the historic use

STARK, P.J. ¶ 1 Patrick and Lisa Humfeld (collectively, Humfeld) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and the Estate of John Curtis Marsh, Sr. The circuit court concluded, as a matter of law, that Humfeld's claims were barred by the recreational immunity statute, WIS. STAT. § 895.52 (2015-16).1 On appeal, Humfeld contends there are genuine issues of material

90 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2000) IDAHO MINING ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency; Charles C. Clarke, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10; and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants. No. CV 98-0390-S-MHW. United States District Court, D. Idaho. Mar

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } In re: Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC } Docket No. 69‐3‐02 Vtec } } Decision and Order Appellant JAM Golf, LLC appealed from a decision of the Development Review Board (DRB) of the City of South Burlington regarding

2025 IL App (4th) 250219 FILED September 12, 2025 NO. 4-25-0219 Carla Bender

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA182 Court of Appeals No. 15CA1824 Larimer County District Court No. 13PR30246 Honorable Devin R. Odell, Judge Barry L. Bruce, Attorney-Appellant, v. Jay A. Roberts and Ashley Roberts McNamara, as Co-Trustees of the Della I. Roberts Trust, Petitioners-Appellees. ORDER VACATED IN PART AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS Division III

Opinion by Judge MILLER. In this action seeking payment of excess proceeds tendered at a public trustee foreclosure sale, plaintiffs, Anthony and Pamela Janicek (homeowners), appeal the trial court's orders in favor of defendants, Obsideo LLC and 1502 Forrestal, LLC (collectively, Obsideo) and Snavely Development Company (Snavely). Snavely cross-appeals the trial court's denial of its request for attorney

JUSTICE GABRIEL deliver ed the Opinion of the Court. ' {1 This case principally requires us to decide whether dissatisfied beneficiaries of a testator's estate have standing to bring legal malpractice or contract claims against the attorney who drafted the testator's estate planning documents. 1 Speci

Filed 1/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER, Plaintiff and Respondent, A146573 v. (San Francisco City & County CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA, Super. Ct. No. CPF-14-513875)