Cases

MEMORANDUM Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania The instant, matter arises from a tax collection effort by the United States (“United States” or “goyernment”) against defendants Avery and Dena, Gary, and Wendell Sollenberger (collectively “the Sollenbergers”), Design Concepts Company, Associated Dynamics, LLC (“Associated Dynamics”), Teltec Enterpr

Justin Davis v. Wicomico County Bureau, No. 46, Sept. Term, 2015 Opinion by Battaglia, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE - RES JUDICATA A party’s failure to appeal a judgment entered against him in 2011 in a child-support enforcement proceeding in which the hearing Judge found that his execution of an affidavit of parentage was not the result of fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact precludes his ability under res judicata to relitigate his claim two years later in which he contested legal parentage bas

BATTAGLIA, J. Justin Davis, Petitioner, twice sought to secure a paternity test years after he had executed an Affidavit of Parentage, in which he attested, shortly following the birth of twin boys in 2009, that he was their father. The Wicomico County Bureau *305of Support Enforcement (“Bureau”), Respondent, in 2011, ha

This is a suit by the trustee of an insolvent foreign corporation to recover from a stockholder the unpaid balance due on his subscription to the capital stock. The Roanoke Development Company of Virginia, after a brief career, made an assignment to the appellee for the benefit of its creditors. The company was one of the many ephemeral and speculative concerns, which, a few years ago, suddenly sprang into existence throughout portions of Virginia and Maryland, and perhaps elsewhere, and delu

We adopt the following statement of the case made by the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals: "Appellant, a private corporation, brought this suit, on June 7, 1907, against appellees, Wiliam H. Davis, Alletta B. Davis, his wife, and Ida F. Brooks to cancel a deed made by appellant through its president, William H. Davis, on June 4, 1904, to his wife, Alletta B. Davis, and Ida F. Brooks, conveying them two hundred acres of land situated in the county of Dimmitt, and State of Texas, the pro

Mercure, J.E Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Cannizzaro, J.), entered March 25, 2003 in Rensselaer County, which denied defendant Stephen J. Huneau Jr.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him. This action arises out of an August 2000 three-car accident in the City of Troy, Rensselaer County. The accident occurred after defendant Juan Rivera’s vehicle, traveling

808 A.2d 809 (2002) 147 Md. App. 280 Jane PETITTO v. Wayne F. PETITTO. No. 00514, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 6, 2002. Reconsideration Denied November 15, 2002. *813 Cynthia E. Young, Annapolis, for appellant. Matthews S. Walls, Frederick, for a

558 F.Supp.2d 53 (2008) COMMITTEE ON the JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. Harriet MIERS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0409 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 31, 2008. *55 Irvin B. Nathan, U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, f

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

178 Pa. Superior Ct. 407 (1955) Abrams v. Crown, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 24, 1955. July 21, 1955. *408 Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, and ERVIN, JJ. *409 Reuben Singer, with him Meade & Singer, for appellants

114 S.E.2d 913 (1960) Mildred SPURLIN v. Corrine NARDO. No. 11096. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted May 3, 1960. Decided July 6, 1960. *915 Handlan, Garden, Matthews & Hess, Thomas B. Miller, Wheeling, for plaintiff in error. Jeremy C. McCamic, McCamic & Tinker, Wheeling, for de

Action for damages for the death of plaintiffs' minor son who was killed on December 25, 1945, on State Highway No. 84, between Hayti and Caruthersville, when struck by an automobile operated by the defendant. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs for $500.00 and plaintiffs have appealed. Appellants contend that the amount of the verdict is so shockingly inadequate as to induce a conviction that it was the result of either passion, prejudice or partiality on the part of the jury; th

5 Ariz. App. 10 (1967) 422 P.2d 740 O'MALLEY INVESTMENT AND REALTY COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Lyle TRIMBLE and Margaret E. Trimble, husband and wife, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.[*] No. 1 CA-CIV 295. Court of Appeals of Arizona. January 27, 1967. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1967.

302 S.W.2d 924 (1957) Joe CAPRA, Frank Accurso, Sam Accurso and Jack Accurso, Respondents, v. PHILLIPS INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, and Hotel Phillips, Inc., a Corporation, Appellants. No. 44784. Supreme Court of Missouri. En Banc. June 10, 1957. *926 Albert Thomson, Clem W. Fairchild, Al Lebrecht, Kansas City, Davis, Thoms

This is an action for a declaratory judgment. For clarity, we will refer to the parties to this appeal as plaintiff and defendant, the positions they occupied in the trial court. From an adverse verdict and judgment, defendant Louise B. Jones appeals. Plaintiff George H. Weber was Executor of the estate of his deceased sister, Anna C. Weber. The defendant, Louise B. Jones is a niece, her mother being Augusta Baehler, a sister of deceased. The Safety Federal Savings and Loan Association

272 S.W.2d 297 (1954) Lota VOSBURG, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Archie SMITH, Executor of Estate of Sarah Ann Smith, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant. No. 7253. Springfield Court of Appeals. Missouri. October 26, 1954. *299 Esco V. Kell, West Plains, for defendant-appellant. Green & Green, West Plains, for plaintiff-responde

Plaintiff (respondent here) sued defendant (appellant) for damages alleged to have been caused in an automobile accident which occurred in the State of New Mexico. Plaintiff obtained judgment for $5,000.00 and defendant appealed. An adjudication of the case involves the construction of the guest statute of New Mexico, as it is conceded by both appellant and respondent that the law of that state is applicable to this case. Section 68-1001 of Chapter 10, Art. 68 of the New Mexico R.S. 19

Campbell, J., delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action by notice of motion brought by plaintiff in error to recover damages for the death of Mildred Lee Neice, a child seventeen months of age, who was killed by a train of the defendant company. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, which is now before us upon a writ of error. The defendant maintains through the city

Argued April 21, 1925. Defendants were the sole distributors, for certain counties of western Pennsylvania, of a patented invention or device for burning oil for heating purposes, which was known as the Wat-R-Oil Burner. During the summer of 1921 two of the defendants called at the place of business of one of the plaintiffs and left with him certain pamphlets describing the device, and made arrangements for plaintiffs to witness an exhibition of the working of the burner. Some time later plai

[1] Plaintiff (respondent here) sued defendant (appellant) for damages alleged to have been caused in an automobile accident which occurred in the State of New Mexico. Plaintiff obtained judgment for $5,000.00 and defendant appealed. An adjudication of the case involves the construction of the guest statute of New Mexico, as it is conceded by both appellant and respondent that the law of that State is applicable to this case. [2] Section 68-1001 of Article 10, Chapter 68 of the New Mex