⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “SMITH v. YELLEN”

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-12-06 · Published · cited 23× · 832 F. Supp. 2d 490; 2011 WL 6088636; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140338
MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. This action arises from an aviation accident that killed Mark Yellen and Paula Moffett (collectively, the “decedents”) -on May 10, 2010 when they were flying in a privately owned aircraft. The plaintiffs, on behalf of their decedents — both apparently citizens of Tennessee1 — commenced this wrongful death and survivor action in the Cour
Fisher v. Yellenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Kari L. D. Fisher, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-00329 (CRC) Scott Bessent, Secretary of Treasury, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kari L.D. Fisher, an attorney with the Internal Revenue Service, filed two separate pro
Allen v. Yellenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PATRICIA A. ALLEN, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-1214 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 205
Collins v. Yellenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-03-04 · Published · cited 5× · 27 F.4th 1068
Case: 17-20364 Document: 00516225209 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 4, 2022
Hardy v. Yellenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FELICIA HARDY and BARRY POPE, as personal representatives of the estate of Andre Hardy, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:16-cv-01572 (TNM) JEROME H. POWELL, in his official capacity as Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-19 · Published · cited 23× · 34 F.4th 841
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF ARIZONA, No. 21-16227 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:21-cv-00514- DJH JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; RICHARD K. DELMAR, in OPINION his official capacity as acting inspector gene
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022-07-14 · Published · cited 16× · 39 F.4th 1063
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2118 ___________________________ State of Missouri Plaintiff - Appellant v. Janet L. Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; Richard Del
Burford v. Yellenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 12× · 246 F. Supp. 3d 161; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48906
MEMORANDUM OPINION Rosemary m. collyer, united States District Couit DeBora Burford was a law enforcement officer in the Law Enforcement Unit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from 2002 until February 20Í2. Ms. Burford alleges that she suffered discrimination due to her sex and age and was retaliated against after she asked the Boar
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-11-01 · Published · cited 6× · 120 F.4th 904
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1867 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. JANET L. YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Treasury, and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ST
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-11-18 · Published · cited 26× · 54 F.4th 325
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF TENNESSEE,
Bauer v. Yellenpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-04-22 · Published · cited 6× · 548 F. Supp. 2d 88; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33419; 2008 WL 1849158
(2008) Christina BAUER, Plaintiff, v. Linda YELLEN, Keckins Projects Ltd., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 15287(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 22, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. KEVIN CASTE L, District Judge. Plaintiff Christina Bauer, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Linda Yellen and Keckins Proje
Yellen v. Hakepublic domain
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006-07-07 · Published · cited 4× · 437 F. Supp. 2d 941; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47012; 2006 WL 1881205
437 F.Supp.2d 941 (2006) Barry YELLEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Ralph F. HAKE; George C. Moore; and Maytag Corp., Defendants. No. 4:05-cv-00388. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 7, 2006. *942 *943
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIHAELA BILIOVSCHI SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03065 (CJN) ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary, United States Department of State, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION For over two years, Mihaela Biliovschi Smith worked for the State D
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0317p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PORTER SMITH, │ Plaintiff-Appellant
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005-09-21 · Published · cited 6× · 380 N.J. Super. 273; 881 A.2d 1243; 2005 N.J. Super. LEXIS 279
The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D. This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Smith v. Fireworks by Girone, Inc., 182 N.J. 138, 861 A.2d 843 (2004). It arises from interrelated disputes regarding (1) the proper source of payment for a judgment against a municipality and in favor of a child injured after a fireworks display, and (2) the viability of a pr
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-08-18 · Published · cited 4× · 838 S.W.2d 113; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1360; 1992 WL 195491
838 S.W.2d 113 (1992) Robert KENNETH-SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. 61065. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. August 18, 1992. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied September 16, 1992. Application to Transfer Denied October 27, 1992. *114 Da
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 980 F.2d 741
980 F.2d 741 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Wi
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 974 F.2d 1345; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29751; 1992 WL 219042
974 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. D
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F.3d 1250; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39218; 1996 WL 3907
74 F.3d 1250 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Be
Smith v. Safflepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 989 F.2d 508; 1993 WL 59300
989 F.2d 508 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Mi