Cases

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. The Indiana War Memorials Commission supervises the Soldiers and Sailors Monument at Monument Circle in Indianapolis, as well as several other monuments in downtown Indianapolis. A Commission policy requires even small groups to obtain a permit before gathering on Commission properties. Plaintiff Eric Smith and his young son were expelled from Monument Circle for protesting a proposed United Nations

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 13‐1939 ERIC SMITH, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INDIANA WAR MEMORIALS COMMISSION, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division

ACCEPTED 14-14-00631-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014

63 F.Supp.2d 694 (1999) Debbie F. SMITH and Tracy Newman, Plaintiffs, v. The RALEIGH DISTRICT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH; and the North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church, Defendants. No. 5:98-CV-715-BR. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. July 27, 1999.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 5514413 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00116-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/30/2025 12:00 AM No. _____

Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON. THOMAS, Circuit Judge. In this appeal we consider whether the district court erred in denying a writ of habeas corpus sought as to petitioner’s conviction and death sentence. We affirm the district court’s judgment as to the conviction. However, we conclude that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ring v. Arizona, 53

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. In these related cases, Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 barring Defendants from implementing various provisions of North Carolina Session Law 2013-381 (“SL 2013-381”), an omnibus election-reform law.1 (Docs. 96 & 98 in case L13CV861; Docs. 10

ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2012 IL 112040 Caption in Supreme DOWNTOWN DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee, v. THE CITY Court: OF CHICAGO et al., Appellants. Docket No. 112040 Filed November 1, 2012 Held The “nullity rule” calling for dismissal of a comp

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF : No. 171 MM 2014 ATTORNEY GENERAL, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERVISING JUDGE OF THE THIRTY- : FIFTH STATEWIDE INVESTIGATI

N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,

No. 06-15-00075-CV FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/9/2015 9:11:00 AM FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk at TEXARKANA GARY DAVID BRAY, et al., v. GREGORY L. FENVES

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

893 F.2d 1349 282 U.S.App.D.C. 200 COALITION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF HISPANIC BROADCASTING, etal, Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent,Univision Holdings, Inc., et al., Intervenors. Nos. 87-1285, 87-1287, 87-1299, 88-1564, 88-1588 and 88-1596. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.

The Constitutional Separation of Powers Between the President and Congress T h is m em o ran d u m provides an overview o f the constitutional issues th at periodically arise concerning the relatio n sh ip betw een the executive and legislative branches o f the federal governm ent. Although th at relatio n sh ip is shaped in part by th e policy and political concerns o f the P resident and C ongress o f the day , the political interaction betw een the P res

759 A.2d 249 (2000) 360 Md. 520 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR et al. v. WASHINGTON POST COMPANY. No. 117, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 12, 2000. *252 Lawrence P. Fletcher-Hill, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for appellants. Carmen M.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–1031 Filed January 25, 2019 MYRON DENNIS BEHM, BURTON J. BROOKS, ROBBY LEE LANGSTON, DAVID LEON BRODSKY, JEFFREY R. OLSON, and GEOFF TATE SMITH, Appellants, vs. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS and GATSO USA, INC., Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Christopher L. Bruns, J