Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER LILLY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-738 (EGS) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Christopher Lilly (“Mr. Lilly”) brings this action against Defendant District of Columbia (“the District”) for events arising from his employ

THIRD DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., GOBEIL and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 17, 2019

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Ekram Siddique worked as a sales associate for Hecht’s and its successor, Macy’s, for many years. In 2009, he was working in Men’s Suits at Macy’s in downtown D.C. and often arrived for work 15 minutes late because he stayed with his youngest child while his wife took the other children to school. When a new dire

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. The parties have filed a number of pretrial motions, primarily seeking sanctions against one another for various alleged misdeeds. The Court will resolve all the motions by way of this order. For the reasons that follow: (1) Defendants’ Joint Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiffs Wholesale Destruction of Evidence [246] is granted in

JUSTICE PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal arises from a trial court’s post-judgment determination authorizing a mother to permanently relocate with her children out of state, notwithstanding them father’s objection to the children’s move. It requires that we address the showing necessary to establish “cause” under N.

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (A-2-16) (077533) Argued March 29, 2017 -- Decided August 8

424 Pa. Superior Ct. 73 (1993) 621 A.2d 1046 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William HOLLOMAN, Jr., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 29, 1992. Filed March 22, 1993. *74 *75 *76 Louis Lipschitz, Philadelphi

HUG, Circuit Judge: Stanley Williams, a prisoner on California’s death row, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his 1981 conviction of multiple counts of first-degree murder and armed robbery and his sentence of death. Williams also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion, made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedu

HUG, Circuit Judge. Stanley Williams, a prisoner on California’s death row, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his 1981 conviction of multiple counts of first-degree murder and armed robbery and his sentence of death. Williams also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion, made under Federal Rule of Civil Proce

Opinión disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García. PARA HACER CUMPLIDA JUSTICIA, AUNQUE MOR-TIFIQUE A ALGUNOS O PAREZCA QUIJOTESCO A OTROS, LAS VERDADES SIEMPRE HAY QUE EXPONER-LAS. Reconocemos los términos vigorosos y críticos de este disenso. Dejamos, sin embargo, al buen discernimiento de los lectores y electores el determinar si los mismos estáu justificados a la luz de las excepciones vislumbradas por

* Writ of error granted. *Page 1042 This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the county court of Wilbarger county, Tex., in a condemnation proceeding, wherein the commissioners' court and the county court of said county undertook to condemn a right of way for a federal-aided state highway through appellant's farm, which consists of about 100 acres situated in said county and ly