Cases

Appellee filed this suit in the circuit court of Sunflower county against the appellant, New York Life Insurance Company, seeking to recover the benefits provided for total and permanent disability in a life insurance policy issued by the appellant to her. The declaration alleged the execution and delivery of the policy, and that the appellee became totally and permanently disabled so as to entitle her to permanent disability benefits thereunder from and after March 1, 1931; that the appellan

642 P.2d 344 (1982) 56 Or.App. 502 C-3 BUILDERS, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant, v. Dale KRUEGER, and First National Bank of Oregon, a National Banking Association, Respondents. Holland Steel Fabrication, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Raymond Schultens, Defendants. No. A8009 01535; CA A20660. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitte

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant B.J. Roberts’ Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On January 23, 2012, this Court issued an Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In that Order, the Court informed the parties that a Memorandum Opinion and Order detailing its rati

DYK, Circuit Judge. These appeals arise from two takings suits related to the 2009 bankruptcies of General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”). The plaintiffs are former dealers of those companies whose franchises were terminated in the bankruptcies. The plaintiffs allege that these terminations constituted a taking because the government required them as a condition of its providing financial assistance

LENT, J. The issue is whether petitions filed by the City of Fairview with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission (Commission) were legally sufficient, as provided by ORS 222.210 to 222.310, to permit action by the Commission on the proposed major boundary change1 that was the subject of the petitions. The answer depends on whether participation of at least two cities is

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 91529-6 ) v. ) En Bane ) MICHAELALLEN BUDD, )

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

NAKAMOTO, J. Plaintiffs Rowlett and his two companies, plaintiffs Westlake Development Company, Inc. and Westlake Development Group, LLC, appeal in this attorney malpractice action against their former attorneys, defendants Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, PC (Schwabe) and lawyers Fagan and Finn. Some, but not all, of plaintiffs’ theories of defendants’ negligence went to trial, as did plaintiffs’ claims for negligent misrepres

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY’S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC., ARCHER DODGE, INC., ARCHER FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., AXELROD CHRYSLER, INC., BARRY DODGE INC., BENNETT AUTOPLEX INC., BENSON MOTOR INC., ARROW FORD, INC., BILL KAY SUZUKI, INC., BOARDWALK AUTO CENTER, INC., BOB LUEGERS MOTORS, INC., BO

28 P.3d 626 (2001) 175 Or. App. 92 Craig R. HANSON, Appellant, v. VERSARAIL SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation, fka Halvorsen Industries, Inc., dba Baerts Metal Products, Respondent, and Seth A. McNair, Defendant. 9810-07146; CA A107956 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 18, 2000. Decided June 27, 2001.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-3283 (RDM) v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Citizenship and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-3283 (RDM) v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Citizenship and

SHAW, Justice (concurring specially). I concur in overruling the application for rehearing. The present appeal arises from the most recent case in a series of actions stemming from the dissolution of Environmental Attorneys Group, LLC, a law firm (“EAG, LLC”), and the competing claims of the various parties, who are former partners in and/or employees of EAG, LLC, to certain fees. The

552 F.Supp. 33 (1982) Bertha Mae CHAMBERS, Plaintiff, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. H-81-2249. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 13, 1982. *34 James H. Shoemake, Houston, Tex., Thomas DeWitt, Crouch, Crouch & DeWitt, Alvin, Tex., for

VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Defendant appeals a jury verdict awarding plaintiff damages in this personal injury action. The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to submit the question of impaired earning capacity to the jury. Plaintiff was injured while helping defendant build a house. He alleged general damages and special damages for medical expenses and lost wages. Plaintiffs complaint did not contain an

(2008) REACHING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. RWT 05-1688. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment envisions a land of religious diversity and tol

929 P.2d 1044 (1996) 145 Or. App. 236 STATE ex rel. PEND-AIR CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE and Vera Simonton, Appellants, v. CITY OF PENDLETON, a municipal corporation, Judy Zoske, City Recorder for the City of Pendleton, and Peter H. Wells, City Attorney for the City of Pendleton, Respondents, and Umatilla County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, and Thomas L. Groat, Umatilla County Clerk, Defendants.

The plat of the lots involved is as follows: *Page 581 [EDITORS' NOTE: The illustration IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.] This is a suit filed in equity for reformation of certain deeds and to quiet title against some of the respondents. On December 31, 1945, Verdie Narkates Gard (one of the appellees) was the owner of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 in Block 14 of the Bascomb Tract, according to a plat duly recorded in the Probate Court of Mobile C

435 Pa. 12 (1969) Brown, Appellant, v. Haight. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 2, 1969. June 27, 1969. *13 Before BELL, C.J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ. Murray R. Garber, with him I.E. McCommon and Norbert J. Pontzer, for appellant. Anthony H. Chambers,</

551 F.Supp. 532 (1982) Margaret A. CHICARELLI, Gregory Chicarelli, a minor, by Margaret A. Chicarelli, his guardian and Isabel Tallon v. PLYMOUTH GARDEN APARTMENTS, et al. Civ. A. No. 80-1331. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 24, 1982. *533 *534 David N. Brook, Media,