Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “SHAWN HIGHTOWER”
Shawn Amende v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued May 16, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— No. 01-18-00065-CR No. 01-18-00066-CR ——————————— SHAWN AMENDE, Appellant V.
Shawn Amende v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued May 16, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— No. 01-18-00065-CR No. 01-18-00066-CR ——————————— SHAWN AMENDE, Appellant V.
People v. Willis (Shawn)public domain
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstShawn Willis, Appellant. New York City Legal Aid Society (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Mario F. Mattei, J.)
Hightower v. Statepublic domain
HINES, Justice. These appeals arise from a joint trial stemming from the fatal shooting of Travis Harris and the pistol beating of Marvin Thurman. In Case No. S10A0383, Ricardel Hightower appeals his convictions for malice murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault; in Case No. S10A0589, Roderick Johnson appeals his convictions for the same offenses. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 11, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00612-CV ROY ROBERT SMITH III D/B/A FORT BEND BOAT STORAGE, Appellant V. SHAWN COUSINS INDIVIDUALLY; TRUSTEE SHAWN COUSINS, COUSINS FAMILY TRUST; AND SHAWN COUSINS D/B/A 3C ENTERPRISES, Appellees
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON CORRECTED ORDER Appellate case name: BDTP, LLC, Shawn Nyahay and Wesley T. Fortune v. United Structures of America, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00464-CV Trial court case number: 2019-48435 Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County On February 11, 2021, this
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: BDTP, LLC, Shawn Nyahay and Wesley T. Fortune v. United Structures of America, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00464-CV Trial court case number: 2019-48435 Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County BDTP’s previous counsel withdrew in Octo
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: BDTP, LLC, Shawn Nyahay and Wesley T. Fortune v. United Structures of America, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00464-CV Trial court case number: 2019-48435 Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County The Court notified appellants
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: BDTP, LLC, Shawn Nyahay, and Wesley T. Fortune v. United Structures of America, Inc. Appellate case number: 01-20-00464-CV Trial court case number: 2019-48435 Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County Appellants, BDTP, LLC, Shawn N
Byron Shawn Brier v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-07-00325-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BYRON SHAWN BRIER, § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS
Byron Shawn Brier v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-07-00325-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BYRON SHAWN BRIER,§ APPEAL FROM THE 159TH
Order issued June 15, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00464-CV ——————————— BDTP. LLC, SHAWN NYAHAY, AND WESLEY T. FORTUNE, Appellants V. UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC.
Commonwealth v. Peterspublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER. This is an appeal from an opinion of the Court of Appeals reversing a circuit court’s writ of prohibition of a district court order requiring the Commonwealth to produce the complaining witness (the arresting police officer), at a pretrial conference for an interview. We opine that the issuance of the writ was proper. In February 2008, Angela Pete
Opinion issued March 10, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ——————————— NO. 01-20-00464-CV ——————————— BDTP, LLC, SHAWN NYAHAY, AND WESLEY T. FORTUNE, Appellants V. UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC., PRECISION BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., ERWIN
Shawn Bascom v. Statepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-90-066-CR SHAWN BASCOM, APPELLANT
In Re INEOS Americas, LLC v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion issued December 17, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00643-CV ——————————— IN RE INEOS AMERICAS, LLC, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING Before MARVIN, HIGHTOWER, STEWART, GASKINS and CARAWAY, JJ. Rehearing denied.
Royce Hassell v. Hassell Construction Co., Inc.public domain
Opinion issued November 24, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00709-CV ——————————— ROYCE HASSELL, Appellant V. MICHAEL HASSELL, PHILLIP HASSELL, SHAWN HASSELL POTTS
State v. Leichmanpublic domain
h HIGHTOWER, Judge. Responding to a call on April 8, 1973, Union Parish law enforcement personnel found Robert Leichman, Jr., armed with a shotgun, at his estranged wife’s apartment. When the officers requested that he surrender his weapon, Leichman shot Deputy Jesse Neal, Jr. While others attempted to guide the wounded man to safety, defendant continued to fire. Upon reaching Neal again, Leichman pulled him from a patrol ca
United States v. Eddie Mae Ivory, Cleo Thomas Hightower, Betty Ann Berry, and Anthony Heardpublic domain
EISELE, Senior District Judge, dissenting. With respect to Mr. Heard only, I respectfully dissent. On appeal Mr. Heard contends that the record fails to demonstrate an adequate factual basis for his guilty plea, and for the district judge’s conclusion that his plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. The shortcomings, the appellant asserts, are in violation of F.R.Cr.P. 11.