Cases

114 S.E.2d 655 (1960) 252 N.C. 743 Petition of the VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY for Judicial Review of the Administrative Decision of the Tax Review Board Relating to North Carolina Income and Franchise Tax Assessments. No. 450. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 10, 1960. *657 Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter

Vitaform, Inc. v. Aeroflow, Inc., 2022 NCBC 65. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION BUNCOMBE COUNTY 19 CVS 3707 VITAFORM, INC. d/b/a BODY AFTER BABY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AEROFLOW, INC. an

118 F.Supp.2d 1233 (2000) LIBAS, LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. SLIP OP. 00-110, No. 95-01-00014. United States Court of International Trade. August 29, 2000. Law Offices of Elon A. Pollack (Elon A. Pollack and Eugene P. Sands), for plaintiff. David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade

ACCEPTED 03-14-00595-CR 4575393 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00595-CR SEE AMEND BRF 3806486 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FLD ON 3/23/15

Case: 20-1415 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BASF PLANT SCIENCE, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ------------------------------------------------- COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr- 00387-AB-1 v. STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte

Case: 20-1415 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BASF PLANT SCIENCE, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ------------------------------------------------- COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC

*196 MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Engineered Controls International, Inc. [“ECII”]1 to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Response of Plaintiffs Brian Coppola, Kimberly Coppola, William S. Stephens, Martin Makowski an

People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

USCA11 Case: 21-10034 Document: 78-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2023 Page: 1 of 106 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10034 ____________________ TREVA THOMPSON,

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (“NWPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., the Department of Energy (“Department”) contracted with operators of nuclear power plants to begin disposal of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) “not later than January 31, 1998.” 42 U.S.C. § 10222(a)(5)(B). It failed to do so. Hoping to stem the tide of li

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 18, 2022 Date Decided: April 27, 2022 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Christine M. Mackintosh, Esquire, Kelly L. Tucker, Esquire and Vivek Upadhya, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT..............................................■......282 A. Alamance County...................................................282 1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County ................282 2. Law Enforcem

575 F.3d 24 (2009) Paul SIMMONS; Pedro Valentin; Dennis Beldotti, Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. William Francis GALVIN, in his capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 08-1569. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard February 2, 2009. Decided July 31, 2009.

662 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: 3:05-CV-596 (Slayman—Oregon) 3:07cv120 (Nevada) 3:07cv272 (Arizona) 3:07cv322 (Connecticut) 3:07cv324 (Givens—FLSA) 3:07cv325 (Vargas—MCSA) 3:07cv326 (North Carolina) 3:07cv328 (Leighter—Oregon) 3:08cv336 (Ohio) 3:07cv411 (Georgia) 3:07cv412 (Vermont) 3:07cv478 (Colorado) 3:08cv193 (Boudreaux—Louisiana) 3:08c

ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2