Cases

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Perry (2019 NY Slip Op 08662) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Perry 2019 NY Slip Op 08662 Decided on December 4, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Grennan (2019 NY Slip Op 06761) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Grennan 2019 NY Slip Op 06761 Decided on September 25, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law R

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT HONORABLE ELIZABETH S. STONG, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Introduction More. than five years ago, on July 6, 2011, USA United Fleet, Inc. and several affiliated companies filed for protection un-der Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. These companies were in the bus

OPINION OF THE COURT Mazzarelli, J.P. Fifth-party defendant Simon Leo Verhoeven and defendant Osvaldo Patrizzi were principals in a group of entities (the Anti-quorum entities) that primarily engaged in the business of selling and trading antique time pieces. The Antiquorum entities were plaintiff Antiquorum, S.A., a Swiss corporation (ASA), plaintiff Antiquorum USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (AUSA), nonp

OPINION OF THE COURT Mazzarelli, J.P. Fifth-party defendant Simon Leo Verhoeven and defendant Osvaldo Patrizzi were principals in a group of entities (the Anti-quorum entities) that primarily engaged in the business of selling and trading antique time pieces. The Antiquorum entities were plaintiff Antiquorum, S.A., a Swiss corporation (ASA), plaintiff Antiquorum USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (AUSA), nonp

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s, RBC Capital Markets, LLC (as successor in interest to RBC Capital Markets Corporation and RBC Dominion Securities Corporation) (“RBC”), Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 127), which is supported by a Memorandum of Law (Def.’s Summ. J. Memo, ECF No. 131) and voluminous exhibits. Plaintif

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Ruth Muzueo’s Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 59]. For the reasons explained in this order, the Court finds that class certification is appropriate. Factual Background In this putative class-action lawsuit, Plaintiff ha

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Through this lawsuit, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the "Plaintiff" or "Commonwealth") seeks to hold Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC, (collectively, "Defendants" or "Navient") liable for conduct that has allegedly harmed student loan borrowers in Pennsylvania, as well as student loan borrowers n

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge In this trademark lawsuit, two fashion companies go toe-to-toe over the right to affix a metal plate to the toe of “luxury” men’s sneakers. Plaintiff LVL XIII Brands, Inc. (“LVL XIII,” pronounced “Level 13”) is a New York start-up company that manufactures, markets, and sells men’s luxury athletic footwear. LVL XIII brings this action against defendan

718 F.Supp.2d 258 (2010) Steven B. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. DERBY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Janet Robinson, City Of Derby, and Tony Staffieri, Defendants. No. 3:08-CV-1365 (CSH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 18, 2010. *260 Daniel Shepro, Shepro & Blake, Stratford, CT, Stuart Hawkins, Bridgeport, CT, for Plainti

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-14-00283-CV ___________________________ JERRY V. DURANT; JERRY DURANT, INC. D/B/A DURANT TOYOTA AND D/B/A JERRY DURANT TOYOTA; JERRY DURANT HYUNDAI, LLC; DOYLE MAYNARD; ROBERT G. COTE SR.; GARY MICHAEL DEERE; JERRY R

673 F.Supp.2d 182 (2009) In re THE RESERVE FUND SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, v. Reserve Management Company, Inc., Resrv Partners, Inc., Bruce Bent Sr., and Bruce Bent II, Defendants, and The Reserve Primary Fund, Relief Defendant. Nos. 09 MD. 2011(PGG), 09 Civ. 4346(PGG). United States District Court, S.D. New York.

340 B.R. 510 (2006) In re OAKWOOD HOMES CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. OHC Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Credit Suisse First Boston, a Swiss banking corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston (U.S.A.), Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Credit Suisse First Boston, Inc., the subsidiaries and affiliates of each,

339 F.Supp.2d 1242 (2003) In re: WILLIAMS SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: WMB Subclass No. 02-CV-72-H(M). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. December 12, 2003. *1243 *1244 *1245 *1246 James Rouse Hi

224 F.Supp.2d 76 (2002) State of NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 98-1233 CKK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 1, 2002. *77 *78 *79 *80

339 F.Supp.2d 1206 (2003) In re: WILLIAMS SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: WCG Subclass No. 02-CV-72-H(M). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. December 12, 2003. *1207 *1208 *1209 *1210

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE 3198) (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, response, reply, supplemental memoranda, and the documents attached to them, as well as the parties’ voluminous evidentiary su

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: *71Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................75 A. Overview............................................................75 B. Plaintiffs’ C

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: [Regarding New GM’s Partial Motion To Dismiss the Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint] INTRODUCTION .. .391 BACKGROUND .. .392 LEGAL STANDARDS .. .394 DISCUSSION .. .395 A. Brand Devaluation Claims... .395 B. Damages for L