Cases

602 F.Supp. 252 (1985) John Thomas WALL, Plaintiff, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3-83-0184-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 4, 1985. *253 Brian D. Weinstein, Sarah Griffin, Baron & Associates, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff. Jim E. Cowles, Cl

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge: Johns-Manville and seven other manufacturers (manufacturers), sued by five persons who claimed that they had contracted asbestosis by working with products of whose hazards they had not been warned by these manufacturers, impleaded as third-party defendant the injured persons’ employer, Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry-dock Company (Newport News) on a third-party claim for indemnificat

482 F.Supp. 1060 (1980) James T. OMAN, Fred R. Walker, Hugh V. Reynolds, and Willie A. Gibbsons v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., and H. K. Porter Co., Inc. v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY. Civ. A. Nos. 76-178-NN, 77-97-NN. United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Newport News Division. January 11, 1

Affirmed and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00209-CV KATHY HARPST, STEPHANIE HARTFIELD, FREDIA RICE, JO’QUITA SANDERS, SHANNON MALM, AND LAGEAN MEDEARIS, Appellants V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. *178“Neither a borrower nor lender be ...”1 Under the Internal Revenue Code, it is difficult for a large corporate taxpayer to follow the sage advice given by Polonius to his son, Laertes. That is, in part, because, although the income tax system is often identified wit

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. In this case, Defendant-Appellant, Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), appeals a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Richard Tisdale (“Tisdale”) as well as the award of $100,000 in punitive damages. The jury found that FedEx violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, by t

145 F.Supp.2d 1348 (2001) PREMIX-MARBLETITE MANUFACTURING CORP., Plaintiff, v. SKW CHEMICALS, INC., Defendant. No. 99-3138CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 24, 2001. *1349 *1350 Michael Shannon, Wallace, Bauman, Legon, Fodiman, Ponce & Shannon, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff

PER CURIAM OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS In this original proceeding we are requested to direct the trial court to set aside its order requiring the production of documents allegedly privileged by the attorney-client privilege and the work product exemption. This controversy commenced when Tommie and Dixie Heathman filed the underlying suit in this case against Fibreboard Corporation for asbestos injuries. On June 15, 1989, the Heathmans submitted their third

This original mandamus proceeding involves an order that an attorney produce her notes to adverse counsel as a sanction for discovery abuse. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus. The underlying suit is a class action toxic tort proceeding. Occidental Chemical (OxyChem) conducted a flaring operation in Corpus Christi. While burning off gases emitted from chemicals that had been delivered by barge, the flame went out and a chemical cloud formed which wafted into the Robsto

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0298p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, -

ON RELATORS’ MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS CHAPA, Justice. This is an original proceeding in which relator, Cigna Corporation and its subsidiaries, seeks this court to protect its attorney-client and attorney work product privileges in discovery proceedings. The underlying lawsuit was instituted by Tom McCorkle, an independent insurance agent, against Cigna for breach of contract. McCork

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00294-CV __________________ MORGAN GENTRY CARTWRIGHT AND JOE SHANNON CARTWRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY, AS TRUSTEES OF THE CARTWRIGHT FAMILY INSURANCE TRUST, AND AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF

322 Pa. Superior Ct. 348 (1983) 469 A.2d 655 Joseph Edward MARTIN, Appellant at No. 1323 Pgh. 1982, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Eagle-Pitcher Industries, Inc., Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., the Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Unarco Industries, Inc., Combustion Engineering Inc., and Raybestos Manhattan, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL FURNACE SUPPLIES, I

662 F.2d 243 John W. WHITE, Ronald M. Cash, Donahue Ellis, Willie A.Gibbons, Thomas J. Hogge, Maurice W. Holloway, Wilon W.Jones, Percy C. Overman, Hugh V. Reynolds, John Lee Roland,Thomas R. Sawyer, Milton L. Stacey, Robert L. Van Dyke,Walter J. White, James T. Long, Homer E. Watson, O. W.Patrick, James T. Oman, Fred R. Walker, Roscoe C. McGuire,Elias James Watkins, Plaintiffs,v.JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION and Johns-

188 F.3d 709 (7th Cir. 1999) Terry Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lincoln Electric Co., Hobart Brothers Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corp., Airco/The BOC Group, Inc., and Teledyne Industries, Inc., Defendants-Appellees,andDr. Thomas W. Eager, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 96-1376, 97-1938, 98-1487 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Argued November 2, 19

KELSEY, J. Stephen Lukács appeals from a final judgment of paternity involving three children born to' his ex-girlfriend, Appellee Christina Ice, while the couple lived together. The relationship and the litigation have been contentious. Each party accused the other of violent behavior and questioned the other’s fitness to parent the children. The circuit judge had presided over this father’s prior dissolution action, which

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1118 Filed July 24, 2019 SHERYL SCHWAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JENNIFER ZAHRADNIK, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Benton County, Lars G. Anderson, Judge. A claimant appeals the district court rulings dismissing her claims of legal malpractice. AFFIR

93 F.Supp.2d 697 (2000) Marie ANDERSON, Executrix of the Estate of Gerald Ellis Thomas, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. CROWN CORK & SEAL, et al., Defendants. No. CIV A 2:00CV82. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Norfolk Division. April 19, 2000. *698 Jonathan A. Smith-George, Patten, Wornom & Watkins, Newport News, VA

PARRO, J., dissenting. hi respectfully disagree with the affir-mance of the trial court’s award of $3.8 million in survival damages in this case, which I believe was an abuse of discretion, given the factual circumstances of Mr. White’s illness. As noted in the majority opinion, the survival action permits recovery only for the damages suffered by the victim from the time of injury to the mome

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-24-00115-CV ________________ PRISCILLA GRAHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F OF MINOR CHILD E.S., Appellant V. JIMMY COLE JR., Appellee ______________