Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Ordered that the order entered August 6, 2012 is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the merits of tenant’s motion to, among other things, vacate the oral order imposing sanctions upon him in the sum of $10,000, to open his default and to restore the matter to the jury trial calendar. In this nonpayment pr

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Ordered that the order entered August 6, 2012 is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the merits of tenant’s motion to vacate the oral order imposing sanctions upon him in the sum of $10,000. In this nonpayment proceeding, tenant, an attorney who was representing himself, failed to appear at the time apparently

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sampson, J.), dated June 11, 2014, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint. Ordered th

Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 03964) Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 03964 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 06590) Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 06590 Decided on December 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 03964) Yen Hsang Chang v Westside 309 LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 03964 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

Saadia v National Socy. of Hebrew Day Schs., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01571) Saadia v National Socy. of Hebrew Day Schs., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 01571 Decided on March 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State La

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated May 7, 2014, which denied her motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Billiard Balls Management, LLC, doing business as Slate, upon its failure to answer the complaint, and granted that defendant’s cross motion to compel her to

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) BOVILL V. QUALITY PORK INTERNATIONAL NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). RANDALL BOVILL, APPELLANT, V.

OPINION OF THE COURT Fahey, J. These cases teach that it is usually more difficult to define what is trivial than what is significant. The common factual and procedural thread among the three appeals before us is that an individual tripped on a defect in a sidewalk or stairway, and was injured, but was foreclosed from going to trial on the ground that the defect was characterized as too trivial to be actiona

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 144 Leonard Hutchinson, Appellant, v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., Respondent. ---------------------------- No. 145 Matvey Zelichenko, Appellant, v. 301 Oriental Boulevard, LLC, Respondent. ---------------------------– No. 146 Maureen Adler, Appellant,

13 Neb.App. 383 DENNIS D. ROHDE AND ALINE I.M. ROHDE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. KENNETH KNOEPFEL AND THE CITY OF OGALLALA, NEBRASKA, APPELLEES. No. A-03-910. Nebraska Court of Appeals. Filed March 1, 2005. Lori A. Zeilinger and George M. Zeilinger for appellants. Jerrod M. Gregg, and, on brief, Edward D. Steenburg, of McQuillan, Steenburg & McQuill

OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge In 2005, two sophisticated companies— Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and Sanmina-SCI Corporation (“Sanmina”) — entered into an agreement in which Intel agreed to disclose to Sanmina highly confidential information that Sanmina requested as part of its attempt to develop potentially lucrative technology that would be compatible with Intel products. In return for

November 9, 2015 HO. 03- /5- D0SM- 6R tH Ttt£ Court of flppBRLb FDR THE 1WWD tiUDIWi DISTRICT OF TEM5 BT AUSTINy TmS ftomy &HE smith 0/?d aO Appellant I/. the 6v?te of rms> flfpel/ec JfppmtD FROM CfiUSE HUMB&. M.W lH TH£ HStmt DISWCT 0>UHT sf bfll eoumy} tems fimiWfs BRIEF -DTdl ffr$mcnt fleiuested-

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS Nfi. 1^15-0057 )-CV DEC 29 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. CLERK XNTHg FOURTEENTH COURT QF fiPPfA 1"S HOUSTON, T£

508 N.W.2d 236 (1993) 244 Neb. 522 John A. FECHT, Director, Warehouse Department, Nebraska Public Service Commission, Appellee, v. QUALITY PROCESSING, INC., Appellee, and Thomas Cullan and Harry Cullan, Doing Business as Cullan Farms, et al., Appellants. No. S-91-266. Supreme Court of Nebraska. November 19, 1993. Terry Curtiss, of Curtiss, Mo

170 F.3d 1213 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2072, 1999 DailyJournal D.A.R. 2683Martina Francisca LAFARGA, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 98-70057. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1999.1Decided March 23, 1999.Amended April 5, 1999.

124 S.W.3d 566 (2003) FIRST STATE BANK OF HOLLY SPRINGS, MISSISSIPPI, et al. v. Bill WYSSBROD, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. April 23, 2003 Session. July 23, 2003. Permission to Appeal Denied December 22, 2003. *567 James R. Garts, Jr.; Michael F. Rafferty, Memphis, for Appell

841 S.W.2d 511 (1992) ANGELES/QUINOCO SECURITIES CORP., Angeles Corporation, Quinoco Oil & Gas, Inc., Quinoco Resources, Inc., Quinoco Energy, Inc., Energy Development Partners, Ltd., Appellants, v. William A. COLLISON, Sr., Juanita Collison, et al., Appellees. No. C14-92-00018-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). November 5, 1992.

838 So.2d 807 (2002) SPORT TECH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SFI MANUFACTURING, INC., Outland Sports, Inc. and Robert D. Berkley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 36,413-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. December 20, 2002. Rehearing Denied January 23, 2003. Writ Denied April 25, 2003. *808